|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Lollipop www.juzaphoto.com/p/Lollipop  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Pentax SMC DA 14mm f/2.8 ED Pros: Magic under half a meter of maf. Cons: Not catching it. Opinion: I approached this lens by accident. In the move to the system Pentax I had to search a wide angle pushed for the few, but important, photos of interiors that I would have been content all'anno.rnMi a decent goal, without spend ourselves crazy. After a few clicks I came across this lens, placed on the virtual shelf of one of my usual suppliers. Price compatible, purchase effettuato.rnUna time in hand I notice immediately the excellent build quality but surprises, all positive, with the first arriving already click.rnNell'uso interior does his duty: a bit 'of barrel distortion (is accused of distortion whisker but frankly I do not see it), all fixable with a single click, crisp, beautiful colors. All as programma.rnMa the minimum distance of maf invites and I've played. Below 50 cm become another target: especially TA produces images almost surreal, a beauty and depth never before seen in a perspective. It is an artistic rendering, definitely not for all tastes, which combined with the beautiful colors of this lightand the fullness of the black pentax, offers new perspectives and intriguing. sent on March 31, 2015 |
 | Olympus Zuiko Digital 25mm f/2.8 Pancake Pros: Compactness, price and good IQ Cons: Slowness and inaccuracy AF Opinion: It was my handyman optics with the 410, the only one that really makes a FourThirds tascabile.rnLa focal length is "normal", not stellar brightness. AF a bit 'slow and inaccurate in low light conditions. The original lens cap screw, who wants to be a sciccheria, is really tedious to remove and replace. Little stuff, just change it to one clip universale.rnFiniti against the pros are relevant, especially in optics of his vocation portability: very high sharpness, albeit with a bit of CA, especially in TA, beautiful colors. The building still excellent and the price "popular", combined with the small footprint make it an ideal candidate for use in a "nasty" where, although not weather sealed, does not move at all for a bit 'of salt, sand or some goccerella of pioggia.rnConsigliatissimo. sent on September 24, 2014 |
 | Olympus Zuiko Digital 35mm f/3.5 Macro Pros: Optically very good. Ratio q / p outstanding. Cons: AF slow. Opinion: I used it for several years on an e-410 and I must say that I have maintained a very favorable recollection, despite the limitations of costruttivi.rnL'ottica presents as economic tuttoplastica and even the pleasant feeling, but makes great photos: crisp on all the fotogramma.rnLa brightness is not greatest but what is more limited autofocus: due to the absence of the limitation of focusing a, passes from minimum distance to infinity even more times before hanging up. There is time to take a coffee:) rnPer anything suitable action, but you forgive everything in still life, macro and ritrattistica.rnPer because the format 3.4 is in fact deceased in terms of sales of new bodies, who had in his hands an Olympus or Panasonic FourThirds should have in my opinion, even for the ridiculous cost, this lens supplied. sent on September 24, 2014 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f/4-5.6 R Pros: It's cheap. IQ 60-80mm Cons: Low IQ at the extremes of the focal building too cheap, aesthetic toy (at least in silver finish) Opinion: The lens in question is not a miracle of q / p: cheap but it is the most honest. Performance is good, too much, between 60 and 80-90 mm. A 90mm do you beat the 45mm 1.8 (this is miraculous) 2x cropped. A 150 gets beat by himself .. 75 2x cropped. At the shorter lens, even at f / 5.6, a lot of chromatic aberration is visible even if the sharpness is good. Remains buio.rnLo recommend only for occasional use and not very demanding, in virtue price, new or used, that is truly affordable l "'experiment." Who does instead of that focal range the instrument "expressive" would do well, in my opinion, to pay attention on something else. sent on September 18, 2014 |
 | Panasonic Lumix G 14mm f/2.5 ASPH Pros: Extremely compact, low-cost Charity Cons: Vignetting, distortion and chromatic aberration (on Olympus body), sharpness at the edges Opinion: I have a relationship love / hate relationship with this lens: cartoon, a little crisp at the edges, distorts and is affected by strong chromatic aberration of body-m5.rnOgni And so I look at him and think "ok, via" but then, on second thought, has a Extraordinary compactness, such as to make a big ML as a compact (fits into the pocket while with any other lens that is not pancake it takes a little bag) and then compared this to become eccezionale.rnPoi, last but not least, is on the market for 'used for a loaf of pane.rnHo given seven but a deserved half past seven and I think I'll keep it forever. Even hating every so often. sent on September 15, 2014 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm f/1.8 Pros: Outstanding optical quality, compact size, value for money. Cons: No one. Opinion: My best purchase ever: the extraordinary optical performance and compact. At full aperture is visible, but only by enlarging a lot, a bit 'of chromatic aberration already at 2.8 disappears tutto.rnE' so small and light that I use it pretty much as normal, still mounted, preferring to auks more canonically handyman 14 2.5.rnNitido as a razor up to f / 8 also covers the needs of a greater depth of color campo.rnL'aberrazione as the slight distortion, the latter practically invisible, are corrected effectively by olympus viewer. sent on September 15, 2014 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-50mm f/3.5-6.3 EZ Pros: To tropical macro function. Cons: Size, optical quality at the upper limits. Opinion: It was the standard kit of e-m5, but unable to express the best of fotocamera.rnBuono in the lower range up to medium focal lengths, the upper limit is to forget. Frankly I do not understand the usefulness of a zoom as well, which is at most a small taste of what you can do instead with the E-m5 with other ottiche.rnL'unica function in which I see it is intended as an objective to battle, and expendable , in the most adverse environmental conditions due to the weather sealing (real plus) .rnNon bad macro function but the quality is just not satisfactory for high expectations anyway. The additional optical mcon on p02-45 1.8 makes photo absolutely superiori.rnLa low light, which leads to higher iso, where the e-m5 suffers a bit ', complete with a picture from just sufficienza.rn sent on September 15, 2014 |
 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 Pros: Quality construction, large customization, also valid for the video. A versatile tool. Cons: The gradient AUTO pulls out a little 'noise. Lacks the focus peaking and wi-fi (for which I solved with an SD card eye-fi). Tropicalization not fully exploited due to the limited range of optics also yelow. Opinion: A semi-PRO but that is fine for use PRO where you search for compactness and versatility (photo / video). Great OLED screen that you see in almost all lighting conditions (I wear glasses and for convenience I have never used the viewfinder). The tools of recovery (histogram, high and low lights, levels are useful and comfortable to use). Above 800 iso noise begins to be seen. A 3200 is annoying. Menu complicated but the ergonomics of the buttons and dials, once personalized, is excellent. sent on September 15, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
