JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 173000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Value for money. Good definition. Compactness and lightness.
Cons:It lacks the lens hood. For what it costs has no other flaws.
Opinion: Ideal focal length to be joined to a 12-40 or 12-35 maybe bright. I bought it again at €150. I have to say I was surprised by the sharpness at full aperture and at all focal lengths. Taking into account the size and lightness is a very good goal. Combined with the 12-40 Pro cover the focal 24-300 equivalents. The plastic bayonet does not affect the optical quality, just treat it with regard. In short, very good judgement if you know what to expect from a little object like this.
Opinion:Rated 8: Excellent price quality considering that with 100/120 € you can take one used. 80/300 focal length Exploabilissima. F 4-5.6 Good by day (of course evening fatigue). Good sharpness for its price, you notice chromatic aberration in the contrasts. Manual mass infinite focus ring like all Olympus base lenses. Zoom difficult to exploit on video.
Opinion:At an incredibly low price it offers a remarkable quality already at full aperture, important thing since it is a little light optics. Taken to complete a kit M43 secondary covers all needs in the field Tele (is a 80-300 FF equivalent). He suffers a little at the highest focal but nothing dramatic. MAF precise and reasonably fast on OMD 10 mkii, color rendition a bit chilly but it easily system in PP. If you do not need an ultrarisolvent at full aperture is highly recommended. As others have done I also point out that the zoom ring is particularly Hard. The all-plastic construction, including bayonet, is of excellent workmanship and with quality materials helping to keep the price low. Recommended.
Pros:Weight (light), footprint (minimum), sharpness from 5.6 up (over 100 mm from F. 8!) but still discreet at T.A., price. In short it is a good lens even if it is not a real excellence.
Cons:I can't find it. Maybe the brightness, but it would weigh more and cost more (see EZ version, for example that weighs double and is brighter than just half diaphragm, almost and does not solve the problem of MAF difficult in low light conditions)
Opinion:Practical, light, discreet. I'm taking him to the purse with the 14-42 machine body. The auto focus suffers a little bit in low light conditions, but just set the manual focus and you're done. Great for going light, traveling, for Street View, trekking. Very manageable so the stabilization of the camera was almost unnecessary and often exclude it completely to the advantage of battery life. For those who want more (and can or want to spend more) there are the focal (almost equivalent) versions of the "Pro" or the most cumbersome FF.
Pros:Weight: Feather footprint: Minimum sharpness: Beyond any real necessity in 98% of cases price: negligible
Cons:Whatsoever. The lens hood is missing but it is not a defect of the objective, it is a defect of Olympus.
Opinion:This lens is a boon for those who want to go light albeit with a lens that pulls a lot (corresponding angle of field on FF: 80-300). The weight is below the two-so lighter than the hood of a pro lens. The price is so low that it is almost outrageous. Given its characteristics is a lens that lends itself well to photography street "timid", the one that does not put the camera in front of the mouth of the subject. The Straconsiglio.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
