|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Pietrostilli www.juzaphoto.com/p/Pietrostilli  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Fujifilm GFX100S Pros: Massive, for Professionals, machine-ready files, white balance, colors Cons: Burst, unse orientable LCD screen Opinion: Thanks to the Attualfoto store in Trieste, I was able to try this Fuji Medium Format. Having already in my possession the Fuji XT-20, I have to say in a few minutes I could easily set up the machine, logical that they added many other functions, but we will talk about it. That's it. I leave for Liguria, for a 3-day Fashion shoot with a professional photographer. Slowly I understand the difference between an experienced amateur like me, the professional needs to have the shots ready immediately, time is money. the Fuji GFX100S in this is perfect, so much substance. The files that churn out can be "Uncompressed" but beware the files that come out are 200 MB each ! I set "LOSELESS" with the files to 120 Mb. Even with a fast SD. I find it suitable for shooting in the studio. The screen is tilting but not adjustable at 360° exactly like the Xt-20. I find this element a small defect, given also the cost. I used it with the 63 mm F/2.8 lens (equal to about 50 mm) We shot in the studio for a fashion editorial and then on an island near Portovenere. Checking the files today, the balance of white is impeccable, the colors and the dynamic range, the details are remarkable. I don't need to do pretty much anything in post. I already have professional shots in the car with some small corrections the files are ready. The feeling of holding this machine, from a feeling both of a massive machine body but of the right weight (about 1 kg), but above all of having a professional camera in your hand. I could observe my photographer friend, he checked before shooting, that all automatisms were turned off, then he always checked the focus. In conclusion, a great car, worth the money it costs... Give professional files, if you can handle it with skills and experience. sent on July 07, 2021 |
 | Fujifilm X-T20 Pros: EVF, white balance, sharpness files, ready-to-go files and weight Cons: Setting the settings to vary in menus, tropicalization Opinion: At the end of the year, I wanted to update the hardware of the "dated" FF SLR Canon but always good 6d, with something more updated and high-grade. Tried the Canon 6d Mark II, I realized that I had to sell my great 6d and add Ben €1,000 to have a little something improved, while remaining perplexed on many aspects that Fuji had astonished me (read the pros of the title). Then I decided to keep it, having also 5 optics of which two Sigma Art for me unsellable! I opted to take the XT-20, cheaper model of the XT-2 but with the same functions or almost. Well after now more than 10,000 shots, I can make a personal review of myself. The XT-20 I like very much, for €919 of list I have a machine that makes it pale expensive and heavy Reflex. In addition 4k Video, impressive gust, autofocus with 325 points, I tried it with both portraits and with the Arrows Tricolori... In short, tested in various areas has left me stunned. I am very satisfied! In the time bought very good goals, essential not to buy a Maserati and not have money for gasoline:-) When I shoot important I use both without problems, if I have to go light, now the Fuji took the place of the Canon... sent on May 15, 2018 |
 | Yongnuo YN-560 IV Pros: Built-in trigger, cost Cons: No TTL and no HSS Opinion: I bought this Flash in February 2015 (Version Mark III) knowing it was only manually, to start to understand the use of flashrnPoi I bought a new car and I took the model compatible 6d, that YN-500 Ex with E-TTL and HSS rnche has always worked badly, while costing more 'and having many automatic functions in piu'rnInaffidabile and often tells me that the batteries are low (just loaded and 100% charge) rnil YN-560 instead is giving me a lot of satisfaction , a hit and often shooting has never stoner with a colleague so we Duerna shoot for hours! I keep it tight, because I paid a little more 'than 60 € (his namesake Canon coast 5/6 times more!) RnMorale: the YN are very cheap in comparison with the same name Canon / Nikon although in some cases, the Flash has flaws, just make it and cambiarlornsaremo always credito..dopo few years definitely the fleet changes, keep a flash for 10 years I see rarorn sent on January 05, 2017 |
 | Sigma 85mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: Sharpness, bokeh, quality 'constructive etc Cons: Weight Opinion: Well what to say ... after trying it now for over 4 hours I would say two words: great lens ... stop! RnIl weight of this lens feels purtroppo..pesata us on 1.25 Kg but it 's all time: greatness glass, large and grosso.rnHo posted some sample pictures, having already '35 Art did not think much better quality'! rnCi are two obvious differences: 35 makes it very well already 'in TA and the blur and' certainly more ' hard and freddornIl brother Art 85 from f / 1.8 better 2.0 and 'exceptionally creamy blurred and very much more' creamy and warm little brother. rnTra the two, and we're talking about the 35 series Art, it seems a good lens, but a comparison is clearly outclassed by his brother rnQuindi after the first shots: convinced me for the money spent, a lens that will give me 'rntridimensionalita great satisfaction' stunning, impressive sharpness and bokeh to the top! rnrn rn sent on December 11, 2016 |
 | Canon 6D Pros: FF sensor, High ISO, low smear Cons: Points MAF side lenses Opinion: I recently purchased more 'than a month the 6D, immediately noticing some significant differences from the previous 7D and I was surprised instead of other differences mentioned to which I have not heard the slightest lack. First of all the buttons and joystick settings completely different, after one hour was all already 'guessed without much drammi..e' CanonrnAnche if and 'spent only a month, I have already' made a lot of shots and some 3,000 have already 'got to to test it thoroughly in various situations: RNLA big difference and 'now I can shoot at ISO 5000 without any problems, before already in 1600/2000 with the 7D was a drama, the noise coming out from the shots was already' very obvious, so PP so much that now I limit myself to a few aspects! rnAltra difference that I felt greatly missed and 'speed' limited, certainly the 7D and 'more' fast ... everything quadagno eg in the halls with the 7D although fast was complicated shoot under ISO 3200 with all the problems that followed then ... now we think more '! rnAltra deartteristica that made me lean to 6D were photos of portraits and landscapes, where I noticed a big improvement on the dynamic range, the tone '.. now this kind of photos are those that primarily affect me and I must say that the 6D ago his duty eregiamente. The lack of built-in flash I see it as a plus as well as wifi and gps useful! RNPs In my opinion I wanted to express my feelings and do not produce a range of sterile technical data which we know do not take good pictures ... rnrnrn sent on June 23, 2015 |
 | Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM Pros: Price, stabilized Cons: Plastic cap that closes not very well miss the hood Opinion: Bought the lens used with Canon 7D, I can put it in comparison with the Sigma 10-22 that I had been paid for a few days recente.rnDebbo say that after a few weeks of the shots optics'm not very bright, day head and of notternIl next weekend lighthouse 'a workshop night with a famous photographer / teacher .. we'll see what he says. According to me in comparison with the Sigma loses much! rnSu all fronts, sharpness, contrast, etc. simple and economic perspective but that 'still can not convincermi.rnVediamo how it will behave' with an usage in a serious and professional set in Veneziarnrnrnrnrn sent on June 11, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
