|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Znick78 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Znick78  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Samyang 12mm f/2.0 NCS CS Pros: Lightweight and compact, good sharpness, fully equipped, versatile focal length. Easy to focus (used f / 5.6 and focheggiando a virtually infinite focuses on every thing ...) Cons: my copy (with attack Fuji X) engages correctly, but the lens when placed under stress has a little 'play (no effect on the pictures). RNLA aperture ring has only steps of 1/2 stop, I would have preferred to third; the distance scale on the focus ring is only indicative and not very precise. Opinion: When I switched from Canon to Fuji I immediately felt the lack of something to replace the canon 10-22. I already had an excellent 18-55 and the incredible 23 f / 1.4, and I had four choices for wide angle: rnFuji 10-24 f / 4, which I considered excellent but a bit 'too bulky and heavy for the philosophy of MLrnFuji 14mm I've read a lot of good: I scrapped (for now) for the cost and the focal length: I was afraid it was too long for my esigenze.rnZeiss 12mm, definitely the top but sold at a price too high for the My budget (with a wide angle I do about 5% of my photos) rninfine, the Samyang, I scelto.rnL'ottica has a very attractive cost, a complete package of lens hood, front cap and a great soft bag for transport. rnMontato on X-E1 is a light game, that is not perfectly nailed to the machine by grasping it with decision moves half a millimeter ... now the thing I was worried after seeing the photos I have not noticed defects; about the photo: for my use of the urban landscape-architecture I use it closed at least f / 5.6, and questin opening is very sharp, as well as easy to focuse. Also open at f / 2, however, is doing very well, apart from a little 'vignettatura.rnCerto, not being recognized by the machine can not benefit from the automatic correction of purple fringing, vignetting and distortion, which are still very very small (in my gallery I posted some photos in jpg as out of the car without post-production) rnrnin substance, for 350 € you bring home a super-wide-angle lens is very light and compact, easy to use despite the manual focus, very sharp, accurate and with a maximum aperture which makes it also suitable for astro photography and any other situazione.rn sent on August 20, 2014 |
 | Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Pros: compact, lightweight, low distortion, vivid colors, fast and silent autofocus Cons: competitors cost a little 'less and offer the hood of the series, but worth the money it costs them all. real defects do not. Opinion: When I tried for the first time this goal, until that day I tried it on my canon 18-55 is the only kit, Sigma 17-70 first version is not stabilized and the canon 18-200 is: all discrete lenses, but the 10-22 made me understand what is the difference between an amateur and a view of a high standard. rnColori brilliant little distortion even at minimum focus, impeccable construction, fast AF ... well, from that moment I realized I had to change also the other lenses I had, because the level of this was clearly superiore.rnCosta enough, but now used is around 400 Euros, and in my opinion there is really tutti.rnè also lightweight, cluttered little more kit lens, and it is a pleasure to take in giro.rnSi should only pay attention: the super wide-angle focal lengths are not "easy"; must us the eye, learn to compose the scene in a whole new way, to avoid making anonymous photo, dispersive, full of details that distract. On the net there are several tutorials to learn how to shoot with such short focal lengths, council to do a search on that. rnAcquisto highly recommended. sent on July 01, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
