|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Styx www.juzaphoto.com/p/Styx ![]() |
![]() | Fujifilm Fujinon 55mm f/2.2 Pros: Economic - Bokeh - Colour Rendering Cons: Manual Focus - Relatively dark (f2.2) - Construction is not at the top Opinion: I bought this lens attracted some photos on the web and its relatively cheap price (40 € M42 version, even less if purchased with bayonet Fujica-X). In particular I was interested for its characteristic "bubbly bokeh", very similar to that of the much more famous and MOG MOG Trioplan 100 2.8 58 1.9 Primoplan. After a couple of shots in the right conditions I could verify that indeed it is! Does not have the pictorial rendering of Trioplan but defends equally well with a well-defined bokeh and color rendering especially warm and typically Fuji. E 'quickly became one of my favorite targets (along with the MC 50 Pentacon 1.8) for walks in nature. Unfortunately, the construction of the lens is far from standard Fujinon, and almost all the copies now have dials little fluid. It 'also strongly recommended a hood because there is no trace of Multicoating. But if you're healthy and acceptable price can peacefully get over it and get a good lens "normal" with which to experiment. sent on April 08, 2015 |
![]() | Pentax SMC Takumar 50mm f/1.4 Pros: Blurred, color rendering, compactness, ease of use Cons: Lack AF Opinion: And 'one of the lenses that must be tried at least once in your life if you decide to experiment with the objectives vintage. The building is impressive, my copy has more than 30 years, and the rings are still extremely fluid and make it a real pleasure to use. And 'the lens I use the most because it gives one blurred beautiful 1.4, an excellent performance between f2 and f2.8 and f5.6 in absolute clarity by then. Placing at the top of the fuzzy Fujinon EBC 50 and 1.4 at the top of the three-dimensionality Planar 50 1.4 I think the Takumars halfway between the two, and as they say, "in medio stat virtus". Besides, it is much more readily available (and cheap) with respect to the above objectives. sent on January 23, 2015 |
![]() | Pentacon 50mm f/1.8 MC (M42) Pros: Blurry pictorial, good (not excellent) sharpness at TA, Price Cons: Lack AF Opinion: It 'very easy review this lens: if you like her blurred, buy it. There is no other lens with the same yield in a similar price. Used is between 30 € and 40 €, which is MC or less little change so you always have a lens hood mettercelo (I will use one very common rubber). The sharpness is already good at 1.8 and it is good because you'll use it difficult to smaller apertures. sent on January 23, 2015 |
![]() | Tamron SP 90mm f/2.5 Macro Pros: Price, sharpness in TA, construction Cons: Lack AF Opinion: I made this point at a very low price (70 € with hood and filter UV included). The construction is solid without being too heavy or bulky. The sharpness already in TA is literally impressive and also allows the crop rather pushed, closed at 2.8 / 4 allows you almost to count the pixels one by one. Paradoxically excessive sharpness can be quite unpleasant in the portraits. A great goal for those wishing to approach the macro without investing big money or however it was looking for a quality fixed. sent on January 23, 2015 |
![]() | Sigma 19mm f/2.8 DN Pros: Quality / Price ratio - Weight and Dimensions - Equipment - Construction Cons: CA and distortion (correctable in LR) Opinion: I chose this wide angle compared to the Sony 16 2.8 for the highest resolution at the edges and especially in the center, where already a TA there is absolutely no comparison. The focus is on rapid and Sony A6000 uses the new hybrid system as the other two Sigma lenses (30mm and 60mm). It's not a monster of sharpness but for the price (paid € 160 new) is the perfect all-rounder. Excellent and impeccable construction equipment (container and lens hood included). sent on August 28, 2014 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me