|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Fabio Bergonzoni www.juzaphoto.com/p/FabioBergonzoni  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Lowepro SlingShot 102 AW Pros: Size, versatility, construction, light weight (for me), speed extraction and relocation SLR, organizing devices and accessories, big side comfortable and easy. Cons: virtually nothing, except some little difficulty in extracting and storing lenses for replacements, but you soon learn. Opinion: The panacea for the tourist photo reportage and, unlike those who preceded me I will also transport a tripod: Cullmann Magnesit 522T, you do not notice in the pictures but, in the side where you can attach the tripod, comes out from under a bag-shaped of ciottola, very robust, where does that leave comudamente two of the stand legs allowing fixing very safe, firm and convenient to transport. Exceptional the possibility to move it from back to front with a simple, single movement, placing it so that, it can be support for photo manuals in which it must be greater stability or comfortably perform all the operations of replacement optical or otherwise, without having to resort to other types of support. I bought it last year (2014) during a trip to Portugal, all of those buses and traveling in a group for intenderci.rnEbbene only one word: extraordinary. In addition to the optics mounted reflex: Tamrom 24/70 10/20 Sigma f2.8 or f3.5, I put there or Nikon 105 f / 2.8 macro or other optical depending on the characteristics of thecation choice. There is the possibility of stow all the material that can serve as an accessory and even more. Highly recommended for those who go on a trip or traveling for tourism or for excursions targeted except those in which it takes very long lenses. sent on June 30, 2015 |
 | Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Pros: Excellent sharpness, good in the center at any focal length and also towards the edges do not lose almost nothing (valuation date on APS-C, who knows what will be on FF :)), good and pleasant it sfocato.rnAF accurate, fast and efficient silenziosissimornStabilizzatore, you can use a very long time and really makes the lens "weapon" infallible in the most extreme shooting conditions. In the static shots, I prefer to exclude even with its super fast because time is not in my opinion the VR causes a small vibration that for those who want absolute clarity becomes fastidiosa.rnCostruzione: very solid and well built, well-sized rings and right in friction, and excellent useful extension block zoom.rnHo used the optical far outside only and a few portraits in natural light so I can not speak for use with studio lights and backgrounds, for now I have not noticed defects such as flare or another, the colors are nice though with the D7000 I do not think you understand the right settings. Cons: practically nothing, the only relief in my opinion is on the sun visor, a piece of plastic substantially inadequate to slow and practically useless. Opinion: I bought this zoom to prepare for the FF, so I'm not able to fully assess the characteristics. What I can say is that in APS-C I missed so much the ability to use the full 24mm. I think if I had a FF in my last trip to Patagonia, I would have used only this view, already with APS-C I did 80% of the shots and also for the views I preferred to shoot in vertical sequences, where the affinity the lens shooting freehand was extraordinary. sent on December 14, 2013 |
 | Sigma 100-300mm f/4 DG EX HSM Pros: Brightness, distortion and vignetting non-existent with aps-c, despite handling the weight, good sharpness up to 280mm., Excellent and smooth zoom range Cons: Lack of stabilizer, weight, low quality of the coating Opinion: Sigma AF 100-300mm f / 4 EX DG HSM APO is an objective surprising once you are including affinity with the camera united to him. Personally I use with the Nikon D7000 and I still have not figured out if it is the machine that uses optical or vice versa. However, the ability to safely use the high sensitivity make this almost perfect combination for photo hunting especially the "prey" bigger. Good AF speed is also everything works fine with the converter Sigma 1.4x EX DG, even if it is a normal loss of definition, but not so annoying. Exceptional versatility focal, mainly because the tele retains its length and this is a feature especially useful when you have to take on safari beyond the means crowded. Among the problems, the most annoying is the peeling of the coating where the hands more insist using it, and in the long run the weight repeated using freehand which however is notso crucial and it is useful to regard the use of a support: with a good mono foot, becomes "weapon" infallible and from the results fabulous. sent on March 04, 2013 |
 | Sigma 10-20mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM Pros: Construction, sharpness, brightness, contrast and saturation in excellent yield, angle of exceptional flare practically non-existent and the ability to mount 82mm filters even if it is one more quality. Cons: distort excessively 10mm MAF ring for manual hard. Opinion: the own recently and I am not an expert photographer so much detail to judge this perspective. But for what I could see on the field seems to me a great goal. I've never owned a wide angle at this level and 'he' has crept regret not having bought it before. I think my travel report qual'cosa would have more if my kit there was this great Sigma is a true stimulator of creativity and soothsayers when the shots made is extraordinary. A short'll prove it with my new D7000 and I can not wait. sent on January 31, 2012 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR II Pros: Versatility, good at short focal lengths: 18mm to 70mm, discreet also the magnification in the macro base Cons: overpriced, shoddy construction, too much play on the outside 200mm Opinion: Even for me was very comfortable in my travels, always ready for a variety of uses. Do not have happened to me all the "troubles" that have happened to others, but their last trip I made in Burma, was spun the dial filter holder that I fixed with a few drops of attak. For the rest in my opinion is a very good lens that is used carefully (wisely preparing the shot) to great satisfaction in the use of reportage, even in the portraits is not bad but this is a judgment that do not have a lot of preparation in the field . sent on November 24, 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
