Reviews written by Giuseppe Taravacci

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Giuseppe Taravacci
www.juzaphoto.com/p/GiuseppeTaravacci

PROFILE

ALL PHOTOS

GALLERIES

Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Giuseppe Taravacci

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm f/1.8

Pros: Sharpness, brightness, quality even at TA, weight, use of the focal characteristics, price, construction and much more.

Cons: Okay, the lens we buy it is not original, so is the same thing.

Opinion: I own this lens for years and this review is a dutiful tribute to the little traveling companion who has always done his duty exceeding all expectations. The 45 1.8 (reparametrato FF 90) is apparently a view to remove a whim for the first floors, purchased under the pressure of fans of the various forums. Then NO: the quality of the lens in hand is realized. This little gem is a surprising little short canvas that gives everything in "studio", at home, in the street, and in the landscape. On the mqt, wanting to have fun shooting around light and fast with "limitations" of weights and encumbrances but certainly not of quality is essential by going double with Panaleica 15 or with 9-18; very good tripletta along with 12 Oly (three-dimensional!) and 25 (good both the two Oly and the Panaleica). Thanks 45!

sent on February 12, 2018

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f/4-5.6 R

Pros: Price, weight, size, good extension of the focal length (almost 4x), handling.

Cons: Bayonet-mount plastic, precise but to be treated with care. Rightly dim and rarely suitable for intensive use.

Opinion: Objective "honest". Definitely worth all that it cost. Personally I enjoy more using the wide-angle and ultra-wide angle, requiring no more than just enough to optical tele. So it is a good compromise between investment and actual use. In other words I consider this perspective a good complement to the kit, just to take the 2-5 percent of the photos. For hunting with a mirrorless camera is the 40-150 2.8 to three million pounds ...

sent on February 26, 2015

Olympus OM-D E-M5

Pros: Quality, weight and size, versatility kit available.

Cons: Use menu quite complicated in the case of transactions not repetitive.

Opinion: Firm supporter of micro 4/3 for the pros mentioned above. In about two pounds or so it carries a kit "universal" that puts in a position to perform almost EVERYWHERE qualsisi shot type of excellent quality with a total expenditure under 3000 euro. Excellent tool: if the photos do not "are" depends only on the photographer. That is enough, good click.

sent on January 29, 2015

Samyang 7.5mm f/3.5 UMC Fisheye MFT

Pros: yield, construction, cost, minimum distance of focus, fun and incredible shots (peculiarities of the objective).

Cons: does not communicate with the camera then you lose the stabilization. Easy to abuse ...

Opinion: I fully agree with Misterg and repeat his comments, pointing out what I've personally seen. I use this lens with the Olympus OMD-EM5.rnNon I practice fisheye, however I enjoy using it a lot. I found the focus to infinity is not very precise: focheggia a bit 'before, leaving a bit of overtravel, but the fact is negligible.

sent on May 27, 2014