|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Emtc74 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Emtc74  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF 85mm f/1.4 D Pros: Construction, compactness, blurred performance both in the foreground and behind the subject, good and precise speed of the AF Cons: Not received for his field of choice, the portrait Opinion: It is a lens to my taste irreplaceable to make portraits if you use Nikon bodies. I had one for many years, I was stolen along with other things. So wanting to buy a new 85 1.4 I picked up the modern AFs. The initial emotional effect of buying the new toy faded away I began to be disappointed by the images I got. More contrasted, saturated and with a blurred in front of the subject less sweet than the elder brother. Nothing to say instead on the quality of the blurred behind the subject. So to understand if it was sensations or real features I bought another 85, the 1.4 AfD and for a few months I had them both, mounted simultaneously on my two D700 bodies, set in the same exact way. Well, to my taste, the old is preferable to the new, the fuzzy is softer, almost ethereal. The new for cons is actually sharper both in the center (of Little) and at the edges, (of a lot) and this feature together with a greater optical correction and the greater contrast that is felt especially at the most closed diaphragms, make it certainly suitable Also to genres other than portrait. The old 85 1.4 AfD, however, remains a lens that in the field of choice, the portrait, is sharp, delicate and faithful in the tonal rendition that is also rich in shades, respectful of shadows that does not close minimally and endowed with this blurred magic that has made him Earn the nickname of "Cream Machine". Very effective at short distances, say between the Metro and four/five meters, this is where the best. A professional lens definitely optimized for portrait. Detractors attribute a mediocre sharpness to both TA and F2, but this feature is only true at the edges from the center to two thirds of the field framed sharpness is more than good. At F4 (my diaphragm working for tight portraits in order to have both eyes in focus) sharpness is even excessive. Finally a note on the building; Besides being compact and light (compared to the canons of the current 85) it is so well built that it gives a pleasant sensation to the touch. sent on February 06, 2019 |
 | Nikon 18mm f/2.8 AF-D Pros: Solid metal construction Lens PRO Series D, good sharpness in the center and the edge closing from f4 forward, becoming excellent at f8, colors, ability to read the shadows and tonal passages typical lens D, lightweight and standard filter thread 77mm Cons: Vignetting absolutely invasive almost unusable TA becomes only good from f5.6, distortion whisker marked and difficult to correct. Opinion: A lens with strengths and weaknesses, this is the last 18mm sold by Nikon, was the treasure of the long tradition of this focus of the company but does not reach the heights of excellence in other Wide Angle casa.rnAd any case appears to be a lens well built , by good optical scheme (think element aspherical precision grinding), small and light. Holding discreetly the backlight, has an appreciable sharpness that the edges diminishes significantly even if the best from the f5.6 onwards and finally, thanks to the reduced distance focusing also allows effects creativi.rnPurtroppo suffers both a marked vignetting , so invasive as to be almost unusable TA, it is a marked distortion mustache. It 'true that today with the digital first flaw is corrected easily with a click but the second is more difficult to correct, so watch the flat horizon line in the final paesaggi.rnrnIn today that used to revolve around 500 Euros you can take into account, provide a fair return for the price of several precautions at the time were uponano a price totally out of business. sent on April 14, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S 24mm f/1.4 G ED Pros: Construction, quality and image rendering, tonal passages passages from fire to fire off gradual and pleasant, ability to open the shadows. Cons: Price and a pronounced vignetting at full aperture. Opinion: I have for some months and it took the love incondizionato.rnL'ho taken with the idea of ??using it instead of 17-35 in the outputs and read in a week it has supplanted! RNE 'wonderful color rendering very classic Nikon without excessive contrast and saturation that characterizes some of the recent accomplishments of the house, such as 14-24.rnL'autofocus is fast, quiet and precise (I use it on a D700) .rnLa sharpness is excellent and especially uniform throughout the field as it is also beautiful passage from the areas in focus to those outside fuoco.rnLa PDC very low enables, in combination with the focal shots very unique and creative beyond the classic landscape. For example, I use it also for portraits ambientati cut particolare.rnLa construction is great with a solid body (tropicalized) magnesium coated with a thin layer of plastic to protect the precious water materiale.rnInsomma ultimately for me is really a lens to have (purchase price permitting) in your kit. sent on January 31, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
