|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Maurizio Verdecchia www.juzaphoto.com/p/MaurizioVerdecchia  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sony A7r V Pros: FOR LANDSCAPERS - Programmable Bulb, Dynamic Range, Remote Control Management via smartphone, Handle, Focus Bracketing, Sensor protection during optical change Cons: I would not call it a cons, indeed, but the side effect should be highlighted by many megapixels should be mentioned (Heavy files, difficult to manage with normal hardware, for those who are not equipped the post becomes a nightmare unless you turn to compressed RAW) Maybe the Price but I've seen worse. Sony cards with absurd price Opinion: A great car. That would be enough to say them all. For a landscape architect like me who comes from the sony A7III I must say that the jump is very big. The quality of the files and the possibility of gamma recovery is very high. I limit myself to give my impression of a landscaper who for work, has to face all the most disparate situations. The ability to set the bulb in the car I find it a point in favor, very much in favor. Goodbye remote controls and missed connections with smartphones. Speaking of smartphones, for those like me who do night at Cityscape Urbano and do continuous Bracketing it is essential to use a smartphone, well this machine connects instantly with its APP. Do you make a video for an IG story? It disconnects, reopens it and is immediately back online within 2 seconds. During my activity I have to connect all kinds of machines and I see people going crazy with machine/smartphone communications. the rV sony wins hands down on all. The many megapixels instead have their pros and cons. Does an average amateur photographer need this camera to take landscape photos? Absolutely not - It churns out files that require very important hardware and above all for maximum yield requires the use of GM optics that are not very cheap. On the Megapixel aspect a remedy is found because the camera allows you to shoot even with different types of RAW compression, including 1 lossless, consequently the files have a smaller size. Does it make sense for a landscape designer? Sometimes yes, maybe for a night bracketing, it makes more sense for those who maybe do ceremonies and make 2000 shots per event. Turning to the compressed, however, is a compromise, do I buy the Ferrari to go there with the limiter at 70 km / h? The possibility of cropping in the machine or in the post phase, opens up a completely parallel world. Focus Bracketing is something that is very useful for those who make landscape and therefore positive note. Of course sony does not arrive first in this sector and above all it is not that you could not do a stacking during shooting without this function, but the automatism is not to be repudiated, indeed. Possibility to fix the intervalometer and the number of shots to make a startrail without remote control, another positive note. Autofocus, not judged by a landscaper, just talk. Articulated screen useful but I certainly did not buy it for this reason :-) Last aspect, the sensor that is protected during the change of optics is so much stuff for those like us landscapers is struggling with changes in the open and especially in any condition. On the ISO side I still leave some time to deliberate, I have to test it well, but it seems excellent in relation to the many mpx. Soon I will compare it on the iso side with the jewel A7III that holds them wonderfully. Updates to follow sent on January 14, 2023 |
 | Sony A7 III Pros: Machine value for money TOP of the TOP, Holds very well the high iso Cons: Ergonomics, unmessed menu, more, optical viewfinder Opinion: Coming from Canon SLRs I must say that the handle of this mirrorless is a bit uncomfortable but you get used to it. Very high performance on almost all fronts. At high iso it works very well and on the market has prices that do not fear any competition. A machine to have if you already own a fleet of sony Emount optics. Hardly with the IV they will do better. sent on December 18, 2021 |
 | Canon EF 70-210mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Pros: Excellent value for money. In good condition with light does not miss a beat. Very sharp. Zoom to pump, I find it very pratico.rnO WRONG THE REVIEW, I am referring AL 70-210 F. 4 FIXED Cons: Lack of stabilization, but at that price what you want. A little loupe Af and also noisy but minor detail in relation to the photos that churns out this obiettivornO REVIEW THE WRONG, I am referring AL 70-210 F. 4 FIXED Opinion: I am definitely happy with the purchase made, a lens to be more users compared to the 70-200 F4 L series. I have not tried the L series cited above, but this lens sounds great in value for money. Surely lose a little bit in terms of light is not good because it does not stabilized and this is a flaw, it is a perspective that I think you absolutely must have if you do not have a high budget. rnCARISSIMO Juza WRONG I HAVE THE REVIEW, I am referring AL 70-210 F. 4 FIXED MOVE YOU, THANK YOU AND I'm sorry sent on January 09, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
