Reviews written by Sasal

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Sasal
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Sasal

PROFILE

ALL PHOTOS

GALLERIES

Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Sasal

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

Canon EF 35mm f/2 IS USM

Pros: Light and handy

Cons: quality / poor value for money, clarity of expectations, colors.

Opinion: I expected a lot from this goal by reading reviews but was disappointed: my yardstick are the goals that I know very well (canon 24-105 f4 and f2.8 canon 40 stm); I made the same shot with the 24-105 set to 35 mm to f4 and the comparison is awkward: the sharpness of which extol the praises of the 35 I only read in the reviews, the 24-105 is not only sharper, but the autofocus it is more accurate and the colors are another story. Even comparing with the 40 it comes out badly if here the colors are identical sharpness is all in favor of the 40 it costs a third ... a note in favor of the 35 is the speed autofocus compared to that of 40 stm.rnLa vignetting full aperture is remarkable but that is easily corrected, the autofocus is fast but accuracy is not his forte ... I'll try to make a microtaratura autofocus hoping to improve the situation .rnP.S. After the auto-calibration the situation has greatly improved, although the prevision autofocus can be improved

sent on August 09, 2016