|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Ippo105 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Ippo105  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM Pros: Sharpness, stabilization, construction. Cons: Hood, flare. Opinion: Use this fantastic lens for a few months and I am fully satisfied from its use. It has a really excellent sharpness and falling toward the edges and really negligible. Even at full aperture is very clear is the best of themselves in f9 and f11. The stabilizer works well and allows to use it in interior with low times without the risk of camera shake. The building is a real number L, fluid and without ferrules games and body by a nice firm feel. It has become my standard lens for excellence is despite the reduced focal often prefer it to the 24-105 f4 which now often remains in the backpack. Even the distortion to 16 mm is modest, the only flaw is that the flare for a lens of this kind should be more controlled. I had to remove the protective filter (Hoya pro digital 1) because it was impossible to photograph with artificial light, any neon or lamppost created glare although I tried to avoid it by all means. Without the filter, the situation improved a lot buta lens of this level I find a significant flaw. Another thing that does not satisfy me in the inner lining of the hood; It is velvety and is a vacuum cleaner for hair and lint. Also once they are attached are extremely difficult to remove. Lens that advice to have in kit for landscapes but is also ideal for the street or as a handyman glass if you do not feel the need for focal with longer stroke. sent on March 16, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
