|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Siraimon www.juzaphoto.com/p/Siraimon |
Tamron SP 45mm f/1.8 Di VC USD Pros: Sharpness, color fidelity, weight Cons: Poorly engraved images Opinion: Purchased used as an optics for use in full-length portraiture, I was pleasantly surprised by the sharpness of this lens, which was not overly expensive. The colors of the images are faithfully reproduced. In my opinion, it lacks incisiveness in the details, in short, it is not really a blade, but the sharpness overall is more than good in relation to the price paid. Let's say that on the very first floors I choose something else. Well done construction, slow autofocus but once engaged, it doesn't make mistakes anymore, unlike the other brand that once you take home the photos, you spend time figuring out why they are out of focus. This is one of the reasons why I chose Tamron. If I really have to find a fault, sometimes small chromatic aberration in strong contrasts, but little stuff. I would say that I would recommend the purchase. Stabilizer in the normal range. Last thing, very light lens. sent on November 02, 2023 |
Nikon AF-S 35mm f/1.8G Pros: Lightweight, autofocus Cons: Unsharp at the edges Opinion: I looked for it a lot in the second-hand market, but once I mounted and tested it in the field, I was disappointed by the sharpness. From a fixed point of view I expected more. It is true that it does not cost a kidney like other goals, but honestly in the details it did not satisfy me. On the D780, which already in itself returns pasty and little engraved RAW, this lens gives the coup de grace to your photos. Usable in landscapes and architecture, but not in full-length portraiture. I eventually resold it and got a quality zoom. sent on March 04, 2023 |
Nikon AF-S 85mm f/1.4 G Pros: Sharpness, bokeh, weight Cons: None in my opinion Opinion: Really excellent lens, if you do portrait you must have it, creepy sharpness, low weight, vignetting and chromatic aberrations not received, sometimes under intense light sources some flare, but in large diameter lenses it is quite normal. Maybe a better designed hood would have improved the situation. Perhaps the hood is the weak point of the lens. Pleasant and soft colors. Lightweight, and it's no small thing on a SLR. Taken used, although difficult to find it, The price of the new is only for professionals. sent on March 04, 2023 |
Nikon D780 Pros: Good shots at high ISO, robustness. Dual SD slots, enjoyable Live View Cons: RAW pasty, little engraved. No pop-up flash, no battery grip, no auxiliary led AF Opinion: Coming from a D7500 I was a bit disappointed. RAW files are pasty and poorly engraved. It will be for the antialiasing filter that the D7500 does not have, or for the FF sensor, the fact is that to have a good sharpness and well-engraved and contrasted images, it is necessary to work with PP. For the rest good camera, good images even at high ISO, interesting for those who use the live view equal to the Z6, of which it inherits the sensor and the focusing system. Convenient dual SD slot, Excellent battery life, but you can not apply the BG to have the shot vertically. Absurd choice, as absurd not to attach a detailed manual, but to have it only online. There is no LED light that helps the autofocus in low light conditions, as there is no pop-up flash that was useful both to drive other flashes, and in "emergency" to lighten some shadows. The menu is classic Nikon, very similar to the others. It's more of a studio camera than "everyday. sent on December 24, 2022 |
Nikon D7500 Pros: Tropicalization, weight, autofocus, burst, color gamut, Noise at high iso Cons: Lack of battery grip, automatic underexporetion, connection with smartphone works when you feel like it Opinion: I state that I do not make videos, so in this review the video sector is missing. By now it is well known that every now and then Nikon gets some camera right, this is one of those succeeded well, although something leaves a bitter taste in the mouth such as the impossibility of applying the battery grip or the lack of the flash ski cover. I never use the automatic and not even the scenes, when I tried them I noticed that the photos tend to under exposure. For the rest it's fine, fast and precise autofocus, bright and clear viewfinder in the well-readable information, good maneuverability of the rings. ergonomics overall are also good, although using heavy freehand canvases, the blew tends to form on the right index finger. For the purchase price it offers several features, including tropicalization and burst at 8 fps. The noise at the high iso iso and little perceptible. Connecting with the mobile app is critical, sometimes it sometimes goes unexplicably not. Many complain about the lack of the dual slot, but with what high-capacity SD's cost today, I don't see it as a problem. Good dynamic range and if you shoot directly in jpeg, release photos of excellent quality, both in colors and in light / dark, almost always well balanced. Wide menu but simple setting. Excellent durability of the single battery. sent on August 01, 2021 |
Nikon AF-S 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: Sharpness, weight, autofocus Cons: Hard zoom dial. Stabilizer not excellent, price of the new. Opinion: Purchased used to replace the excellent 70-300 VR. For sure the sharpness is very good. The freehand weight is also well manageable, although in the long run it makes itself felt. The stabilizer did not excite me. Difficult to maneuver the zoom ring, hard and with jamming. Big flaw for those who pirate photos of fast-moving subjects. Autofocus remarkable for accuracy and speed. Solid and robust construction. For the rest excellent lens at affordable price if you find it used. The price of the new one seems to me to be disproportionate to the overall quality of the lens. sent on July 18, 2021 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me