RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



Giuseppe.aver
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Giuseppe.aver



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Giuseppe.aver


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

nikon_d700Nikon D700

Pros: Tropicalization, eternal shutter, construction, soft and workable files

Cons: Lack of tightness at high ISO, 8fps obtainable only with battery pack, heaviness

Opinion: Repurchased in 2022 only to have a "vintage" SLR in my kit now composed only of mirrorless, I consider this machine not a full frame but LA full frame. All the advantages of a D3 in a relatively lighter camera body. I divide my personal review into 3 parts: Pros, defects, neutrality. ADVANTAGES Well, tropicalization allows you to have a camera body that, in situations of small rains or bad weather in general, during ceremonies or outdoor situations, you are not there to think, and now? The car gets wet, what can I do?, misery and "All the saints in the air". You don't care, stop, go ahead and work, so in your hands you don't have a car but a tank. Eternal shutter, with a classic sound that looks more like a shot than a shot (which I think is very cool) mine has 47k shots, they give it for 150k shots, but I have seen models of colleagues who take wild photos in extreme situations with more than 200k shots continuing quietly to use it as if there were no tomorrow waiting for the shutter to give way (but at this point it is more likely that they give in). I state that I shoot only in raw and after 14 years still pulls out soft and workable files with lightroom, full of information being able to still make the world. The controls are all at your fingertips, without frills and above all without getting lost in the meanders of the classic nikon menus that are sometimes complicated (something I found in the younger sister D750). If you do ceremonies or study it continues to be a perfect machine still bringing work home without any problem. DEFECTS: If you want a machine with high ISO seal forget ... holds maximum to 3200 after which you will have to play a lot of luminance to the detriment, unfortunately, of the annoying painted effect that comes out, therefore, equip yourself with luminous lenses otherwise you can have serious problems. I mainly do sports photography for basketball and football teams and in such situations 5fps are very few; can also get 8fps but only with battery pack MB D10 even if there are various tutorials scattered around the network that allow you to reach 9fps without battery pack going to set specific functions on the function keys (I have never done it because these keys are set for other functions for me fundamental, therefore, In sports photography I work with battery pack. Working with the latter, the weight increases further: body, battery pack and 70 200 to f2.8 returned home practically destroyed and this thing is deleterious! Its heaviness is a very negative point. NEUTRALITY 'In this section I state some points for me neutral (the classic "who cares") that for you could be negative points: Sensor at 12Mpx ... Guys, we are talking about a machine from 14 years ago, unless you want to crop endlessly or print the mega posters size elephant who cares, they are fine anyway and the quality is excellent. Lack of video side... Guys this is not a video camera, it is a camera so it does not make videos but photos. If I wanted to make videos today I certainly would not do them with a Nikon D700, but not even with a D750, I would do them with a sony A7III getting a superlative quality to work, and if I had to make a video "a priscio" for social media, I repeat, certainly I do not do it with the D700, but even with the D750 but I do it with my smartphone so "WHO CARES?". Conclusions: they are now used at very affordable prices, if you need a second spare body buy it, if you need to gain experience in the photographic field and you do not have a big budget, buy it, you will have LA full frame often at the lower cost of entry level aps-c that will make you shoot like dogs, without "being able to dare" and that pull out embarrassing files even for the god of lightroom

sent on November 20, 2022




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me