|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Fabio7530 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Fabio7530  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon Z6 Pros: I think the best mirrorless, period! Cons: None for the product type. Needless to say "battery life" or slow ignition compared to the reflex, a few shots or other and blah blah blah. It's mirrorless! With the pros and cons of the type of product (as the reflexes have theirs accordingly). Opinion: I was lucky enough to test it at a Nikon event in Catania with the 24-70 f4. It is a fabulous stain for both ergonomics, quality of materials, image quality etc. Nothing to envy to competitors, besides I made a comparison on various websites with other Nikon reflexes and other cameras of other brands and I saw that in the low ISO holds up to about 3200 as sharpness.... You do it.... I found this kind of estate in the now historic Nikon d3s... 12mpx..... 24.5mpx of the z6. An xqd slot? I understand security but it's not a sd is an xqd.... also larger buffer of the sd (see burst with RAW - JPEG). The same things are found at other shores at lower prices or at the same price we have more?.... I don't know... In my parts it says "so much spend, so much you have" is the same when for some sensors (in my opinion) it is better to put indoor and quality optics and not of other type (although "goodies") as much cheaper. Even in that case "so much spend, so much you have" does not exist at the same price I get more (maybe good results there is but of ... or even as I hear "I spend less and I get a plus"....), there is always a downside and one notices when he actually tests the product in the one for which it was designed and with the proper optics. But of course, I would like to point out, everything written above is just a pure and simple personal opinion. sent on May 25, 2020 |
 | Nikon AF-S 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: Autofocus very fast, exceptional sharpness, covers several focal distances, VR of 2nd generation PERFECT, weight and small size...... But you want more. Cons: For the product range has no defects. 10 and praise Opinion: I say that I am an amateur (but one who constantly studies both the theory and his own equipment and the same third-party). I mount the 70-300 VR on both my D7200 and my Nikon F5. The color yield, sharpness and stabilization are perfect. I say, but what are you still looking for? Obviously compared to the 70-200 f/2.8 we agree that the gap is obvious but that is a SIGNOR TELE that maybe is valued on pro bodies. The 70-300 VR as it goes well on the D7200 I think it also goes great on the bodies D7xxx, D750 and D780. I also own the dx 55-300 and the AF 75-300 F4-5.6 and I have to say that while they are both excellent canvases, the autofocus of the 70-300 VR is much faster and more accurate than the 2 (the sharpness of the 2 canvases is cmq slightly lower) then the same mounted on the Nikon F5 has an autofocus even faster and more accurate (so this means that the speed and accuracy of the AF depends not only on the lens but also on the machine body. To put it another way I wouldn't call it an amateur's eye (maybe the 55-300 VR yes). It depends on what work you have to do or what needs you have (maybe a PROFESSIONAL will obviously opt for the 70-200 f2.8). A 160-180mm f/11-13 ISO 100 with exceptional sharpness (.nef 24mpx post-produced file in JPEG files and the same croppato to pc 100% sharp 2nd generation VR works great on both photos and video (also the AF on video is quite fast) I took close-ups to my daughter at 190mm at 1/100-125 sec. freehand and the images were still, coming down still obviously there is the move but I must say that I consider myself satisfied. Finally I would strongly recommend this lens to those who own a machine body from the D7xxx onwards (for the previous series type D3xxx or D5xxx I think the 55-300 VR is fine) also for the price from used very affordable, but what matters is that already mounted on a semi machine body gives some really qualitative images. sent on May 18, 2020 |
 | Nikon D7200 Pros: Photo quality, ergonomics, keys in the right place, battery life, ability to mount vintage optics, 51 focus points, precise autofocus, battery grip possibilities, do I have to continue? Cons: Virtually nothing, I could say the video sector but in 2015 it was fine... Today in 2020 unless you have smartphones from 600.00 euros and up is still fine. Opinion: Purchased in the summer of 2019 coming from a d3200 squeezed and studied properly for 4 years. What to say? Do you want to start taking pictures? In my opinion the best aps-c after the d500 (sin that in the latter have not put the flash pop-up, in some cases serves just. Unfortunately, the d7500 has neither the second slot nor the battery grip). The quality of the photo yield is really good, with the d3200 (which for me still remains a great option) the difference is noticeable especially from ISO 400 onwards, in fact in conditions of little light I shot at ISO 800 and cropped to the maximum practically with a little photo shop the noise is as if there was not (to be expected that the photos I print). Shooting in RAW (which I prefer, I do not have any requirements that impose on me the JPEG) and fixing the balance of white, any noise and various parameters (as you would in a post production in analog) the JPEG photos churned out by the post production are exceptional. And that's what really matters: THE PHOTO. My use is purely for my family but continuously, since mine is an incurable passion: birthdays, parties, performances and various events as well as trips. The ergonomics are great (then with the battery grip is perfect), the internal autofocus engine allows you to use quality vintage optics and the arrangement of the keys is perfect (only the lack of the dedicated ISO key but the various keys are cmq programmable). 3D tracking works like a god, so moving subjects are always in focus. The gust is good for an average use, the 51 focus points for taking photos are fine in quantity as well as quality. The double slot is an added value (serves more if you shoot in RAW). Great autofocus but in very low brightness is difficult, but it is normal cmq. WiFi and the nfc in my opinion leave a little time they find (personal opinion of course), but cmq are there and are another added value (when you pass photos with WiFi in your smartphone, for example, the quality of the photo loses in resolution and color fidelity , for this reason I prefer to download the raw in the pc, do the post production and print the JPEG processed by me), the WiFi instead used x turn the smartphone into a remote remote control is an ok idea. Perfect display meter, huge optical park and for all tastes, JPEG churned out by the great machine, lots of features: from an additional 1.3 cutout to the various jpeg processing options. the "auto" selector (which NOT USE) remains a great option to have you take a picture from any person who to make more photos of the smartphone does not know (so at least every now and then I come in the photos). In my opinion a very good camera, very recommended. sent on February 02, 2020 |
 | Nikon F5 Pros: Pretty much everything. The best analog camera ever. If it were for me I would have left it in production for life. possibility to mount both the old analog optics and the most modern ones that have the built-in AF engine (the af-s to mean). Autofocus fast and accurate. Excellent display meter. You also take new/compatible flashes. Supreme ergonomics. Cons: The weight? Maybe with the 75-300, but if you think about how tough it is, you forget it. Lack of the ghieres upright. Opinion: I think everything has already been said in the previous comments. A machine that today (since it is at an affordable price compared to the 90s) should not be missing in the kit of every amateur photo. Yes, sir, because analog photography still has that magic (as well as qualitatively still very high) that makes you feel really satisfied with the work you do and this jewel is undoubtedly the means to continuously discover this kind of emotion. The optics all range from old to newest af-s: a real genius. I, for example, that I have the d7200 practically use the same optics (obviously all FX) for both and the same thing applies to the external flash. Of course those who work there to camp will tend towards the most modern mirrorless systems but those who cultivate this passion for love and personal satisfaction can only fall in love with this beautiful machine. sent on October 17, 2019 |
 | Nikon D3200 Pros: Very high-performing for an entry level, cheap (in 2019 you find it less than 200.00) intuitive, ergonomic, excellent quality of materials and then it is a Nikon. For those on a tight budget and especially for those who want to do PHOTO and not video, social and blah blah blah... Definitely the best to start with. Cons: Missing the internal engine of the autofocus (but it is an entry level), in the evening from ISO 800 onwards is not the maximum (but it is an entry level and pure aps-c), burst just enough (but it is an entry level), live view let's leave it alone (but do you have to take photos or videos?). You will not be able to sell it, you will pass to the next body FX machine holding your beloved D3200 with all the kit as a second body because it will be true love. Opinion: Buy in 2016, a used practically new (0 shots) a stroke of luck. Coming from the old analog photography and then forcibly passed to smartphones I decided that for my newly born daughter I had to have something that guaranteed me real photos (as well as studying photography techniques). D3200 18-105 a winning pairing. Initially used automatically, then RAW-JPEG, now only manual RAW iso 100 (usually), little flash and optics: sometimes 18-105 other 35mm 1.8 depends. It is always an entry level so the top models of the same series can have a slight improvement of the high iso but just a macula, the real jump you had compared to the old model d3100 (which got to try). The native 24mpx provides a truly enviable image quality, a machine that deserves to be used in manual and RAW and not automatically as a simple "point and click". Have the pleasure of establishing the aperture of the diaphragm and the shooting time according to an expometer that works well. 11 autofocus points that allow you to decide the optimal focus with respect to the subject and cmq up to ISO 800 in the day are fine, in the evening even with the flash I would not push beyond 400. Because in fact the only thing that unfortunately you can not have compared to a d800 onwards is a high iso yield that allow you to get to 1/4000-6000-8000 sec. But those are full frames and cost a bang as sensor is large and therefore photoreceptors - large" yield salti better. This is an entry level (even from the d7100 onwards the iso are better but they are always aps-c) so always work at ISO 100 and in RAW pays a lot and if you ever want to develop (I now almost always do) the photos obtained even in 50x70 format you will notice the image quality. Finally the JPEG obtained in post production is much better than the JPEG obtained by the camera, that's why I say: better RAW. Great camera for street photography and especially for portraits (the optics I recommend that are the ones I own are 35mm dx - 18-105 dx - 55-300 afs dx), festive trips and whatnot. A real gem. True... But the movies aren't much... But I have to take pictures... lacks Wi-Fi... But the RAW I have to move it into post-production. Expensive options let's leave them to those who work and really have needs of this type, for those who really love photography and especially love to always learn - to take beautiful photos will understand that the moment he decides to switch to full frame the d3200 will remain his second body Machine. Who decides to stay in aps-c will perhaps opt for a d7200 as the first body and the d3200 as the second. As I said before, "a little jewel." sent on September 20, 2019 |
 | Nikon F601 / N6006 Pros: Excellent reflex, excellent ergonomics and robustness, has the built-in flash. He really takes some good pictures Cons: No cons, for the 90s it was a real gem Opinion: Bought almost x prank at 15.00 euros on eBay to delve into analog photography. I already owned a Nikon d3200 (entry level beautiful and performing) as soon as I framed from the crosshairs opened a world. Paired with the 35-70mm and the 75-300mm, it churns out really good photos on the large format. Then with the built-in flash you can also take some photos inside the properly lit premises or on the streets in the evening. Precise and fast autofocus in the norm of the camera itself, at one point only in the center of the viewfinder but once in focus you can move the camera. exposure to diaphragm priority, single point exposure measurement and Matrix, Camera that cmq use by day since I normally use the 200iso film. What to say, a real gem that gives so much satisfaction and that allows you to shoot in full frame with a really minimal expense. sent on July 29, 2019 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
