|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Nicola Belloni www.juzaphoto.com/p/NicolaBelloni  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | DJI Mavic Air Pros: Dimensions, weight, portability, in-flight performance, automatic functions, 4k video, battery charge in just 50 minutes Cons: Lag video if you do not have a direct view. Opinion: The Mavic Air is phenomenal, first you have it in your jacket pocket, and soon after you fly at 70 meters of altitude to take panoramas at 36mp ... very stable, even with strong wind or a light rain he is there, stable and safe. rnle photos are good but the videos are great, stable gimbal and very diverse shooting functions, including panoramas, circular, spherical, vertical panoramas ... rnI did not do great tests to verify the signal but in the open field and arrived at 700 meters away at 120 altitude without the slightest problem, from some videos on youtube you can see it darting up to 3km ... Vice versa when the vision of mavic is not directed because you trap buildings you have some lag in the transmission of the video, the signal, however, is not lost and the return home is always safe and sudden even in the case of complete loss of signal. rnThe Mavic air drives itself, with all the sensors that it can not crash even if you want, if you are faced with an obstacle it automatically avoids ... rn strongly recommend this drone to all photographers and hikers for the size andperformances that have nothing to envy to the pro, indeed, being within 500/600 meters this is certainly better ... rnrnIMPORTANTE: Finally I remember for those interested in buying the ENAC legislation for hobbyist use (non-professional) rn " The activity is carried out in areas appropriately selected by the aerodellist, up to a maximum height of 70m within a radius of 200m, in unpopulated areas, sufficiently distant from buildings, infrastructures and installations "Therefore for most of us photographers use almost free, it is not necessary to attend courses or take the so-called license ... the important thing is to always be responsible and aware of what you are doing sent on March 14, 2018 |
 | Canon EF 14mm f/2.8 L USM II Pros: firmness, clarity, construction, speed of use (AF) Cons: Nobody Opinion: I have read many negative opinions about this lens ... including pure review of juzza landlord who even raises, lower than the canon 16-35 ... this is not my experience ... Many negative aspects were addressed the list price of 2300 Euros, but now is a much cheaper price and then everything takes on another aspect ... is a lens from disarming sharpness, compared to the previous version there have been significant advances especially from the point of view of and the sharpness of the ac correction. I think the only real rival is the Canon TS-17 and 15 and Zeiss, which, although slightly higher for the optical quality pay both the fact of not being af ... I find this the best fisheye lens available for Canon, its reduced size also make it a companion that always finds space in your bag ... sent on February 10, 2016 |
 | Canon 5Ds R Pros: Cool, much quieter than the 5D3 Cons: Mto slow to save images on sd Opinion: I had the opportunity to try this machine, and the same approach as the 5D3, if not for the fact that it is much quieter in the shot ... The files sn very sharp, but less than I expected. This probably is due to the fact that I tried it with 50l which does not shine in this respect and also in situations of low light and low contrast scenes ... The I still found it a great camera for those who like me does landscapes and portraits. Probably I will assess the acquisto.rnConcludo saying that although I have processed the files of a retina MacBook I noticed some difficulties in the management of such large images ... A tiff containing some level in ps exceeded anything like the gb sent on June 15, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 14mm f/2.8 L USM Pros: Af, automatic diaphragm, construction, size, sharpness, angle of view Cons: Vignette at rt, chromatic aberrations Opinion: If you want to go below 16mm canon in the house, there are many alternatives ... And that lens and certainly a valid solution ... RNLA and impeccable construction, solid and sturdy, af a very fast and the ability to automatically manage the diaphragms ... So nothing to do with the plastic of the Samyang that a difference of this approach is certainly not what one can define an objective "point and shoot" ... RNLA first thing I appreciated the size, and really small and always finds space in the bag ... rnPer regarding the optical quality ?? Well and a 14mm and we can not expect miracles from this focal ... Personally I place it between the 16-35 f2.8 and 14 2.8IIrnDa a comparison made with the latter there is any significant improvements in version II but I think they are not such as to justify the cost ... And a lens that by the maximum of whether landscapes, and crisp gia ta but reaches a maximum between f8 and f16 where it really affected ... In enclosed spaces, vignetting occurs unpleasant instead not reflected in the landscapes, disappears agocult to closing the diaphragm and is easily correctable in PP ... And definitely a lens that I would recommend ... sent on August 09, 2014 |
 | Manfrotto 190 X PROB Pros: very versatile and excellent stability Cons: a bit long to carry around Opinion: I find this tripod is a good compromise quality / price, I faced all kinds of situations from snow to mud up to now Salt water and after a few years of service is indistinguishable from new ... the ability to break down quickly column, and rubberized feet make it completely stable on any surface, even if at first glance seems precarious it takes half a hurricane to move it ... although infinitely more portable the 055 is still quite long and heavy for trips outside the sent on July 31, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
