|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Claudio Pietraviva www.juzaphoto.com/p/ClaudioPietraviva  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon 6D Pros: Sensor fantastic. Resistance at high ISO spectacular. Professional dynamic range comparable to the TOP. Very solid and compact camera body, a really handy FF (from D600 to 6D weight change a little 'you can see it). Menu well done. Management of the external flash. System focus good in particular for the central point. The advice to venture into the FF Cons: Maximum speed shutter. It would have been interesting dual slot. System focus is good but a camera that deserves more. Front ring is not very intuitive to use. Keys auditing and zoom shooting, less intuitive and speedy 600D, need to practice as a ring. Opinion: Hello I wanted to add my review "Fast Impact", in the sense that I took this wonderful two days ago, and maybe an opinion on the first coat might be helpful! RnPremessa until now I used a Canon EOS 600D and my opinion is therefore in relation to this: rnrnUn great means! This we have done in the past several tests with all my goals, I had already thought for the FF, well, this camera really enhances them in full! Give their best and in a sense, with great pleasure, they are "rediscovered"! The Sammy then demonstrates in all its full potential and finally the 14mm is a 14!. RNLA picture quality is fantastic and the dynamic range is the same, these two factors are really awesome for me! I had a few reservations for the maximum speed of the shot and to control the focus, but in the end for my use they're fine indeed! RNLA burst is good and in particular the buffer is not more annoying as in the 600D! The control of the mesa is very similar to fire and then there I did not notice big difference, as I have seen in several reviews is certainly not his strong point. The menus are comprehensive and well-made, in no time you find yourself in control of every thing, in particular, I really liked the control menu of the external flash. The ability to customize the SET button is very useful, along with classic favorites menu really helps a lot to speed up the control of the camera. In terms of practical use, well ... there is a difference in weight compared to the 600D, and then the neck need a little 'getting used to it, in his hand is a beast! Solid, safe and durable. The only flaw for me is the front ring to rotate, I do a little 'hard to use and I was not so comfortable. Also the control system and the zoom and revision of the shots is a bit 'more laborious and unintuitive. rnLe novelty of GPS and Wifi, are very useful in some ways but pe me just outline ... hardlyand maybe I'll change my workflow by downloading the photos with Wifi without removing the SD! Great if you have these possibilities, but it is not for these things that I bought it. RNLA great thing is its quality and use in the field! For me the FF sensor feels great, both for quality and for reference to the optical fantastic for me this thing that I sell to APS-C! RNE 'really precise and respond blow for blow, it is a great pleasure to use! The way I see get the shot before profit, often with the 600D imagined the photo, mailed the car, and then after shooting constatavo that the sharpness or something else was not quite as I wanted, so I had to revise (often with amazement) the parameters several times even sacrificing time or aperture to get where volevo.rnI 6D instead of the first uses were incredibly accurate. I thought ... I mailed ... a couple of shots ... ZAK and there she was! Perfect! rnMi immediately gave a great feeling indeed! I'm excited! Even the optics kit is great, & flaggingI; coupled say good! rnIo the really recommend it to anyone who wants to go to FF! rnSaluti friendly smile sent on November 11, 2013 |
 | Canon 600D Pros: Lightweight and compact. Image quality and sensor. Swiveling display, battery life. Value for money. Versatile. Cons: Burst in RAW format is not very effective. Viewfinder covers only 95% of the frame. Opinion: It is now almost a year since I got it, and I'm not telling me that it was a perfect buy! For me this is the first camera, and I think for anyone who is approaching to photography is really a great choice! Simple, precise, functional and versatile. In 2012 also came out the 650D which made some news. I did not try but I am sure that the 650D is an excellent enty level. The 600d allows me a really good range of photos, has controls very accurate and well ordered, so once made a little 'practice, adjustments become really close. The swiveling display is especially useful for macro photography and nature. The body constructively is very good, even if the handle is actually a bit 'end, and for those with large hands is not always ergonomic. Nevertheless, it is a trusted companion of adventures, its size and weight make it much more versatile than other of its kind. The battery life is amazing! The controlli shooting are always accurate, the AF is great and the mode of white balance and exposure are not always effective. For me, the worst flaw is the viewfinder, which covers only 95% of entire real, I do not understand this limit, however once you know, then you quickly and retain it and after a while 'is an automatic . rnQuindi to finish the advice to those who are approaching to photography and need a machine that is also educational. I use it with different optics and certainly I will keep still long for level sensor is fantastic, just below his sisters. So with a low cost of the camera body, then adding the optics more professional, you get a really good! I would not recommend to anyone who acts as sports photography of a good standard in RAW format, the buffer is not very large and the burst arrives immediately in zone efficiente.rnSalutirn sent on February 13, 2013 |
 | Tamron SP 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II VC LD Pros: Value for money, sharpness, stabilizer, and in general its optics. Cons: AF maybe a little loupe but fully supportable Opinion: In a review should also consider where you come from, I have recently replaced the classic barrel 18-55, with this goal, and I'm excited. Certainly could be better, but just as certainly much more expensive. The yield of this is good, there is really no comparison with the barrel. The lenses are of quality, even if the construction of plastic material, is equally good. The stabilizer in particular impressed me because it makes it very much and in general its sharpness at all focal lengths is good. A lens that I highly recommend to anyone who wants to make a Step Up compared to standard equipment. You will not regret. sent on November 10, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
