|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Cav56 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Cav56  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon Z8 Pros: Ergonomics, operating speed construction Cons: Absolutely nothing Opinion: Busted a few days ago by changing it with a ZF that despite being a great car, has disappointing ergonomics compared to today's modern stains. Operationally very fast, very fast settings and quite intuitive if you come from the Nikon world, what to add is a great machine built like a tank and beautiful and fast, the noise of the shutter makes me laugh a bit but this was inevitable with only the electronic shutter. We'll see how it behaves in use, for now let's give 10 sent on April 03, 2024 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 G ED Pros: excellent resolution at all focal lengths, the Flare is not good maneuverability and focal range. Cons: A bit 'plasticky Opinion: Taken seeds of new opportunity and by the shots that I have done I am very satisfied, now I was sorry for not taking the 12-24 (say more professional), but then I changed my mind .The counsel to the largest is a viewpoint that behaves very good, light and well built for the DX machines is a great obiettivo.rnLa definition at all focal diaphragm 5.6 / 8 and fantastic, and then to the superlative center distorts a 10mm ligtroom hair but with just a click and it is all fine, does not disappoint !!!!! rn sent on April 04, 2017 |
 | Tamron SP 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2 Pros: Portability, construction AF fast and effective stabilization, the possibility of customization Cons: Nothing to declare Opinion: I have a few days for this lens and now I have limited myself to do the shooting tests around the house, and I immediately encountered a problem put fire from 300mm to 500 accommodated with the doc very simple to use .rnHa 600mm I must say that the sharpness is great with a wonderful micro-contrast colors are excellent and exposures costanti.rnIl weight is bearable and is used freehand quietly stabilizer does his duty quietly and effectively, and built very well and there is a good quality design .rnAvevo tried the Sigma sport but the weight has affected him as the nikon 200-500, this is used well by hand libera.rnOra must learn about birds and how you photograph then I think this is good tool. sent on December 24, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: All Cons: Lacks the bracket for the stand, it costs a disproportionate amount Opinion: What about voting 10 on my D7200 is stratospheric The photos are amazing both for clarity and for contrast and color. RNE in my bag for a few weeks but the first shots I made was pleasantly pleased .rnUn really good NIKON optical, On Dx body and even better because it uses the center of the frame, and the definition is migliore.rnrnhttp: //www.imaging -resource.com/lenses/nikon/70-200mm-f4g-ed-vr-af-s-nikkor/review/ sent on September 21, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 16-80mm f/2.8-4 E ED VR Pros: Versatility, overall quality, excellent resolution at all focal lengths, good boken is light enough Cons: Price, not weather sealed Opinion: I bought this lens to match my body D7200 and I have to say I made a good buy, contrato good and excellent color and high definition make this lens a wonderful traveling companion, then I take it with me in motion, the focal length it is very versatile and allows you to do almost tutto.rnMiglioramento natural 16/85 .rnOttimo the blurred and the focus with the 7200 is perfect .rnLo'm still trying, but I must say I very pleased with this goal, I have not posted photos but those of Angelo Butera speak for themselves rn sent on September 21, 2016 |
 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Pros: Quality construction, speed autofocus, full customization, excellent viewfinder (much better than the M5), waterproof and resistant to cold estremo.rnUna real car professionalern Cons: PrezzornManuale instructions unclear. Opinion: There are several days that I use my new WCO E-M1 and I must admit that does not make me regret my m5 that I sold to get the winning combination M1 co 12/40 f 2.8 pro.rnMacchina with a high reactivity, it is resumes after standby much faster than the M5 and the autofocus has been improved greatly, the stabilizer has now set automatically as the EP5 and finally the 8000 calendar year and 100iso.rnLa machine you hold very well and all the buttons are customizable , say that along with the new 12/40 are a winning pair, the images are high contrast and without dominanti.L 'exposure meter works excellently, even in extreme conditions, the new processor seems to work in an excellent way and have not had the opportunity to fully test the high sensitivity but the few photos made me happy (ISO 3200 and 6400). rnDa when I discovered the world and rediscovered Olympus Mirrorless (E1 above) I have never been so much fun to photograph, tired of bringing pounds of stuff on the back, now you are traveling with a car professional-level coNo high-quality optics but with a third of the weight of equal or equipment fullframe APSC.Ma quality photographs and eccellente.rnOMD in the E-M1 camera with a wealth of excellent quality, with its 10 frames per second can almost make a movie sequences and impressive where it comes from the buffer, it has everything it needs to be a small but great car. rnNon are an experienced writer and it is better that the stop before you write nonsense, I spent a little bit to have both the body that the lens but I guarantee you that after the first shots I have not regretted it at all, coupled with a scream. sent on December 02, 2013 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm f/2.8 PRO Pros: Outstanding quality at all focal lengths, both at full aperture and with apertures only to F16 then there is a small decrease but remains ottimo.Minima distance focus movement switching between AF and MF velocissimo.Costruzione Dust and water, solid costruttiva.rnParaluce provided. Cons: Nothing to declare Opinion: For several days I have in hand the fantastic 12-40 and coupled co my M1 and strepitoso.Immagini exceptionally sharp and color-perfect, with no dominant variety, contrast ottimo.Fin too sharp, too many shows in the picture from portrait dettagli.Il price can seem high but when compared with competitors and the results are not much better (http://www.slrgear.com/reviews/index.php/cat/2) to see qui.Se then compare the weight of the competition and less than half, I am referring to Nikon and Canon to Panasonic that is not very simile.rnDa an Olympus Optical superlative in the tradition of the house Giapponese.rn sent on November 30, 2013 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm f/2.8 Macro Pros: Lightweight, weather sealed, excellent yield and also great for portrait and paesaggio.Un impressive detail. Cons: The lens hood to coast a madness, but comfortable. Opinion: I recently purchased the WCO and fast and precise, a value without the selector paragoni.rnAutofocus precise distances and comfortable, for the portrait should use it at full aperture and soften in post produzione.rnDefinizione and detail from fear, competes with best macro market (Nikon and Canon and Leica) rnNon I know what to add, purchase a super consigliato.rn sent on June 14, 2013 |
 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 Pros: Pros: Light weight, small size, 5-axis stabilization, image quality, high efficiency even with 6400ISO, 9 frames / sec, C-AF Tracking superlative, Live-View with touch-screen, electronic viewfinder with pre-visualization effect balance white correction + lights / shadows + level, fixed targets bright, large dynamic range, lens adapter for 4/3 and OM, the only mirrorless tropical, etc. Cons: Cons: zoom low light Opinion: I write the same things as Savior because I agree in full what he writes, the lightness and the quality of construction and the operational qualities for me are favolose.rnI results are truly excellent, the cost to bring in a park not optical fantastic touches of 1 / 3 the cost of the same park on full frame or apsc.rnUn optical lens as the 100/300 4,0-5,6 (200-600) and a zoom lumix not very bright but a 600 5.6 in full frame as would be the weight ratio of brightness? rnSono really happy I'm in love with this car and I decided to replace my D300 excellent, but I made a nice change. sent on January 29, 2013 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 18-300mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: Great lens, excellent sharpness in the center in some cases excellent, great strength and stabilizer. Chromaticity excellent and good contrast of the lens. Blurred thanks to the beautiful 9 blades diaphragm. Cons: Loss of sharpness at the edges but for a zoom of this magnitude I think it's normal. A little heavy but because for years I've carried a 80/200 2.8 weight is there but does not bother most of the time, and certainly does not have the same quality. Opinion: I bought this lens and I was honestly a bit 'hesitant to replace a part of my kit with only one objective seemed to be an impossible task. Boys (I call you guys even if signed in 56 years has little boy) after a few shots to the naked eye and to ascertain the ability to stabilize the lens, the quality of the results that can return makes me excited. After years of carrying pounds of equipment on his shoulder a perspective that does everything is wonderful, go out for a spot of photos with just one lens and be able to do almost everything, still can not believe. I saw the image below, produced, then postero some of my shots, confirm my impressions. I highly recommend. Good light at all. sent on August 04, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
