RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



Maxmax1956
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Maxmax1956



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Maxmax1956


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

fujifilm_16-55_f2-8wrFujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR

Pros: Like everyone else: optical quality and reliability. Contrary to all: THE WEIGHT and the COST (and I would also add the DIMENSIONS)

Cons: If you start from the idea that you wanted to buy a zoom that covers you 24-82 with constant f/2.8: NONE

Opinion: I've been using it for several months and I'm totally satisfied, on the road it's not true that it's heavy (on the T-30II total 1070 grams real, on the X-PRO3 total 1192 grams real) as in the interiors (with 2.8 and a bit of ISO there are no limits). Tropicalized indeed, with top-notch optical quality and made almost to military specifications. But the reason why I felt the need to include this review is that what I read in many of the previous reviews does not seem well thought out, as the weight and cost are always indicated in the "cons", and here I explain: this lens costs about 1100 euros and weighs 655 g; But have you seen how much the similar Zoom of other brands cost and weigh? Ok, I'll save you the trouble and I'll tell you: CANON RF 24-70 f/2.8 2449 euros and 900 g: NIKON Z 24-70 f/2.8 2188 euros and 805 g; PANASONIC LUMIX S PRO 24-70 1989 euros and 935 g....... And I'll stop there. So, in the light of these data, if you still think about the cost and the weight.... well! Better to sell it and replace it with three f/2s. I personally am sorry that it is about to go out of production.

sent on May 10, 2024


manfrotto_tracolla_zaino_medio_ma_bp_tmManfrotto Tracolla e zaino medio (MB MA-BP-TM)

Pros: Elegant, refined and good quality materials

Cons: Cross shoulder straps preposterous

Opinion: It's definitely nice to see compact, top quality materials and shape geometrically defined and smooth, soft but at the same time not "Arsene and" neither empty nor full. Is divided into two sections, the lower one with compartments variables by means of Velcro Industries allocated to equipment photos and above all open set to what you want. At the bottom I enter two mirrorless (XE2 and XT20) with mounted lenses and other three lenses including the big 55-200, besides other three batteries with battery charger, flash, bulb, and other little things. The extraction of the rooms can be made without it off from the shoulders ruotandoselo on belly and its opening doesn't cause objects to fall. You can prepare it with cross-straps but, as he has already reportedly Diego, is uncomfortable neck and trim: unworkable. Only with traditional horizontal shoulder strap but sadly no messi at the front which fixed everything with more stability. Suitable for ML, given the cost, I don't know if I'd buy.

sent on April 11, 2018




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me