|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Walter Oss www.juzaphoto.com/p/WalterOss  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Panasonic Lumix G 14-45mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH OIS Pros: Very incisive, sharp, good colors, VERY LIGHT, focal to a good spectrum of use. Cons: Non-smooth zoom Opinion: I have been using this lens for 6 months exclusively for mountain photos given its 14/45 focal versatility optimal for mountain photos but above all I highlight its lightness and little bulk, mounted on my second body Oly m5II everything weighs 664 gr. Stabilized lens, although I usually use stabilizer in the car. Sharp and incisive at all openings, I dare say from edge to edge, the colors are good in the norm tending to heat, quite soft (but satisfactory) bottom of the field blur calculating its 7 shutter slats (then everyone knows the limits of a 4/3 at this juncture). I can also make good macros having very good minimum distance. It suffers at low lights but you know it starts from 3.5 and so everyone knows the limits of a 3.5 lens. The only flaw is the non-fluid zoom, I only suffer when I make some videos. In general I am satisfied with the purchase with a cost of 150 € I have a lens that satisfies me sent on November 17, 2021 |
 | 7artisans 7.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye Pros: Opening, sharpness already at 2.8, precise manual focus, pleasant blur of the bottom of the field. Barrel all metal excellent construction. THE PRICE of the used car. Minimum distance. Cons: Weight (but you understand it's all made of metal) a little bit of a binge (but which fisheye doesn't ??) Opinion: In essence a lens that does its duty to a few Euros, I always keep it in the backpack for excursions in the mountains, practical also with the focus (manual) and the ring of the diaphragms beautiful fluid. From the maximum of itself to f4 but also to f2.8 it is not bad, even at minimum distances from subjects creates a pleasant blurry at the bottom of the field despite me mounting it on a 4/3. On the other, a little bit of abberrations that I solve in pp but it's normal on such a lens. I'm having a lot of fun and since using this lens I've learned a lot creatively. sent on March 13, 2021 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 30mm f/3.5 Macro Pros: Minimum distance, good yield, VERY LIGHT and not very bulky Cons: NOTHING if just opening 3.5 (but in macros it is not so disabling) Opinion: Purchased used for a few euros I wanted to experiment with this optics I consider myself satisfied, from the really low weight you can also put in the pocket of jeans at rapid optical range (in the sense that I also use it in the street and therefore I put it and I often remove it from the body) does its duty as a macro precise and lightning focus both on Md 10 II and on Omd M1 II. sent on March 13, 2021 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-100mm f/4.0 IS Pro Pros: Edge sharpness on board, F4, tropicalization, focus, stabilized, pro materials, for the size that has weight contained. Cons: Nobody Opinion: I owned 12/40 pro, I sold it to take risks with this new all-rounder lens diu high quality, well I made the right choice, in my opinion the sharpness unlike the 12-40 you notice from board to board. Af lightning and maximum precision if you work in manual with peak visura. The stabilization combined with that of the machine (possible with M1 II) crazy I photographed at 1" (static elements) without noticing the move. Great color rendering, even blurry pleasant despite having only 7 diaphragm blades. Key functions (as among other pros) tropicalized excellent lampshade, only 560 gr for a 12/100 lens, EVERYTHING I use it in the mountains, street, and portrayed, I risked macrophotography and I was satisfied (without clearly taking anything away from a dedicated macro lens). Recommended for those who do not want to change constantly so many lenses. sent on March 15, 2020 |
 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 II Pros: Crazy stabilizer, focus, AF tracking, iso up to 4000 more than acceptable, live comp, hi-res, sniper burst, menu (just study it) appropriate and comfortable commands, TROPICALIZED, in hand falls well, construction, weight, optical viewfinder, 4K video, double slot. Cons: so far I can only say that when you wave on the front control wheel you easily touch the shutter button. Opinion: i'm going to have the 4/3 sensor first: I have this Oly after the mark 1 and the 10 mark II that I still have in my kit. This little gem I liked right away, I immediately know the speed and precision of the focus, even while frame from the crosshairs I can move area AF from the pad of the display (crazy) the Tracking AF does not give up the grip easily (perhaps in some difficult cases with little light). The knockout stabilizer, freehand photographer up to 13" without noticing any micromove (it seems to me a dream). Gentle and non-aggressive Iso up to 3200/4000 but with dedicated optics (sigma 30 mm 1.4) on this machine you almost forget them. The live comp is useful, never under/over. HI-res I tried this new element on this OLy PAZZESCO better than my Nicon D750 (only thing trespassing obligation) a resolution and range excellent (I print large-format digital photos) I tried to print with my plotter and I am very satisfied. Comfortable and really responsive controls, those who say that the menu is messed up have not studied it enough once you enter the OLy optics all clearer and faster, every now and then reset all functions and with 5 min refit everything. It falls well in the hand, the crosshairs excellent. It produces RAW and other softw HHRs. SODDISFATTO POSSO DO A LAST MY CONSIDERATION: those who despise it will surely have a 5/6000-dollar machine in their hand and then take crap photos, bha!!! sent on February 06, 2019 |
 | Sigma 30mm f/1.4 DC DN C Pros: A razor blade crisp, well built, autofocus in the reactive norm behaves well, excellent bokeh. Cons: I noticed (but only in the area of bokeh) that in strong backlight mentions abberration Opinion: Taken to street and portrait and I can tell you that behaves well, even with its fixed focal 30mm is well calibrated for shooting like that on my 4/3 becomes a 60mm. Light but well built clear from part of the frame, focus fast and reactive (then you have to see on what body you mount it), blurred very well balanced and soft still stems well from the close-ups. 1.4 Bright to the point of resuming interiors with little light at 250 ISO at 30/60. What to say I spent €300 (including Lens hood) I think it will not leave my kit anymore. Sometimes Sigma surprises me,... the more I watch it on my Oly 1 mark II and pi I like it. sent on February 06, 2019 |
 | Canon PowerShot G7 X Pros: Pro: Excellent construction, small pocket, RAW sensor good 1 ' ', front bezel on lens for setting commands that I use in DTS, also excursion 24/100 handyman Luminous 1.8 ISO arrives to 1600 then degrades, colors in the standart tends to aggravate warm tones ( Red Cons: Against: Opinion: Photographer with this small canon for about 1 year, I really find como its compactness and so I can carry it in the pocket of a jacket and always have the machine ready. Generally it takes some very acceptable fail,20mp are a good report on its sensor, easy and intuitive menu to focus from the display with a touch. Really sore note after 7/8 months I noticed dust on the internal lenses and sensor immediately. sent on September 26, 2018 |
 | Canon G7X Mark II Pros: Excellent construction, small pocket,RAW good sensor 1' , front dial on lens for setting controls that I use in dts, even excursion 24/100 excursion 24/100 bright all-rounder 1.8 iso comes to 2000 then degrades, color in the standart for that sensor tends to exasperate warm tones (red) Cons: Excursion on the 100 mm distorts a little on the sides, POLVERE ON LENTI AND SENSORE. Opinion: Photographer with this little canon for about 1 year, I find his compactness really comfortable and therefore I can carry it in the pocket of a jacket/pants and always have the car ready. In general it shoots very acceptable fail, 20MP are a good ratio on its sensor, easy menu and intuitive comfortable display focus with a touch. Really sore note after 7/8 months I immediately noticed dust on the internal lenses and sensor. sent on September 26, 2018 |
 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Pros: small, light, comfortable for journalism and street,robust little high iso noise (up to 2500) excellent stabilization, great live, good WB adjustments. Cons: REALLY poor BATTERY, slightly messed up menu. Af at low lights is a little difficult. Opinion: I bought this machine by matching it to my (car park) as a pocket machine always ready, I caught in the really comfortable sign always below, images like the Nikon 300s reflexes if not more incisive, made very good, even in jpeg, i recommend in addition to the 12/40 f3.5 series optical kit 17/25/45 from f1.7 you will have the top. In pp working on a RAW you can correct shadows and lights without the finished jpeg spiling. Infinite possibilities to customize keys and dials, touchpad for focus, even peak for manual focus, trak fire chase good subject. In the shooting menu many interesting fixed options. I recommend the purchase of additional batteries. It also returns great files to the natural without having to go too much to work in pp. sent on January 11, 2018 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
