RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



Alle Power
www.juzaphoto.com/p/AllePower



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Alle Power


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

nikon_35-70_f2-8Nikon AF 35-70mm f/2.8

Pros: Colors, f2.8 to all focal points, robustness/solidity, possibility of transformation into lens "macro" to 35mm, flare.

Cons: Construction defects, sharpness at the edges especially at TA, flare, front lens that rotates in the maf.

Opinion: Slow that networkse images with the most pasty and less contrasted colors, tending to the heat (very pleasant in some cases). The use of circular polarizing filters is not prohibited, they simply need to be recalibrated when moving the maf, especially when the subject's distance from one maf and the next varies greatly. My specimen (non-D version) was prone to lens opacity, diaphragms > 4 the thing was not noticed, but at 2.8 it almost seemed to have a mattifying mask on the rest of the photo that also dampened the colors as well as clearly sharpness. Vulnerability to flare is indeed a problem in some cases but in others it makes the composition non-trivial and absolutely creative. In fact, the flare it generates (especially without a lampshade) is not incisive or said in a word "ugly" (like those lenses that make the sun all in pointed rays), but it leads to a loss of gradual and nuanced contrast. If your specimen does not have the original Hb-1 lampshade you can find it on e-bay, where the original is equal but plastic at 5 degrees, since the originals travel on 30 degrees.

sent on November 20, 2019


huawei_p20Huawei P20

Pros: Raw format, stabilizer, bokeh in portrait function, saturated and balanced colors by default, very large manual options, artificial intelligence, Leica lenses

Cons: To be a phone? Nobody

Opinion: At the time of the release on the market was the top of the range (along with the older brother p20 pro) of huawei, the development of the photo sector with Leica gave him that extra something that for me made the phone with the best camera of 2018 (I did not take in with iPhones because I don't know them well). For those like me who came from a model a little dated the night shots leave open-mouthed, both as shooting time without motion and as a general quality of the photo (sharp) to be made with little light. The bokeh in the portraits looks like my 85 f 1.8 at TA... thanks to the dual camera and the algorithm behind it since the subject is at its sharpest from top to bottom and at the same distance from the center of the frame at another point you have a perfect gradient (which is quite impossible from one point of view if you do not admit the presence of a program that in fact posts produces the photo at the time of the shot). Really saturated colors (perhaps too much in some cases) with balanced colors. Ability to zoom up a certain point without excessive loss of quality, then if you continue you go crop. Of course the photo is perfect and beautiful to see only on small screens or formats.

sent on September 11, 2019


sigma_17-35ex-hsmSigma 17-35mm f/2.8-4 EX DG HSM

Pros: Price, focal range, possibility of mounting screw filters, value for money, distortion contained (visible only to minor focal lengths), overall optical quality in the center, weight.

Cons: Flare, economical/plasticous coating that does not give the impression to last over the centuries and be sensitive to any bumps, noisy autofocus, sharp drop at the edges, vignette at 17mm

Opinion: Premise: My version is not DG and HSM. I use it on Nikon d610. Suffers the flare in sunny conditions in the room without a doubt, to TA the quality is discrete in the center, improves hand by diaphragming, but eye not to go much further to F22 because after suffers from softness due to diffraction (tested to F45 type... photos unwatchable) , at the edges I'm sorry to say but it's obscene (to TA) shutting down a little improves, but not too much. The colors I see them quite cold and definite (the opposite of shepherds but I do not come the term). The AF works fine (uncertainties case never due to the body), but we say that makes noise, then I do not notice maybe someone yes, in any case has never given problems. Good resistance posed by the zoom ring which is also very homogeneous along the whole stroke. It still has the aperture ring, so you can very well use it on the analogue rooms. Rated 9. Really practical because of the focal range that allow you to use it for both landscape and Street.

sent on November 28, 2018




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me