|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Marco24081986 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Marco24081986  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 40mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: Optical quality Cons: Cluttered.... and then the weight Opinion: What do I have to say.... Reason for focal distances.... 50 Art was the first lens that made me say wow, so perfect (if you have a good copy) almost to stew ... Years go by.... I tried the 135 Art ... again WOW, but sold, I was sorry a lot but it was a focal that I never used. Undecided between 35 1.4 Tamron and 40 art I decide to try art. I considered the tamron only for the reviews, the 35 actually I never liked as a focal but I wanted to give it a chance. Nothing, here comes the 40 art... wow again, considering that it is wider than 50 even more wow. A question arises spontaneously why wait so long to get it out on the market? Handicap clutter.... had it been smaller for the focal length that is not hurt sent on January 21, 2022 |
 | Sigma 135mm f/1.8 DG HSM Art Pros: Nitdezza, Bokeh and colors Cons: More than the weight is bulky with a lampshed. Opinion: SHARPNESS (which if you want to find the time you find) I had 3 copies of 50mm art and only one was exceptional after being calibrated. Of 135 I only have one copy and I have no way of comparing it but I am sure it is sharper than the best copy of the 50 I had. Perhaps, indeed let's take away the maybe, in many cases it is too sharp for portraiture, you certainly do not have to find the right light to make the details stand out. COLORS AND BOKEH: I find that the colors and the bokeh are at another level compared to 50 art. CONS (explanation): I find the front lens large and quite exposed. Without a light, the risk of scratching it exists. sent on March 15, 2021 |
 | Sigma 24-35mm f/2.0 DG HSM Art Pros: Sharpness from f 2.5, range from street Cons: A little pensatino but not over the top Opinion: Let me start by saying that I don't mean of wide angles. I got this lens as all do for the holidays. The zoom range is one that interests me as over 35 mm still wouldn't use a zoom but I would attack the good 50 art. The doubt that I done in my head is what can be better, if it is, this lens optically than a 24-70 g2? I didn't like the first 50 50 art but wow is the beginning of tele, second is one of the most crisp goals ever. I could however make a comparison with the 28 1.8 g that I had and that I had some raw saved. I would say that this is in line with the first zoom lens nikon 1.8 G. Just one note, who says that calibrated in half an hour, sorry but I don't believe it, in half an hour you can calibrate a 50 art, but to make all the adjustments made 16 well of this 24-35 a few hours in focus takes quietly sent on April 15, 2018 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
