|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Marcoc www.juzaphoto.com/p/Marcoc  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon 7D Mark II Pros: Sensor resolution, excellent workability of the raw file in post, strength and solidity general, commands comfortable, full-featured Cons: Lack of flash pop up, would need a firmware update to implement certain functions Opinion: This reflex seems to me the best a photo amateur evolved may ask Canon; It allows you to do a little 'all genres: landscapes thanks to the resolution and the workability of the files, thanks to the birds' autofocus evolved and the size of the sensor allow the crop, photo studio, macro, stil life. With the latest update of Lightroom you can not open the shadows without too much noise. Today in 2015 would require more than the whole of a firmware update to implement some secondary functions (such as interval timer, checking car ficus on live view, dual iso etc.) that are now required in a camera of this level. Excellent performance at high ISO and the speed and precision of 'autofocus. sent on May 22, 2015 |
 | Panasonic Lumix LX3 Pros: Definition of images at low ISO, general construction, main commands comfortable, quality optics, ISO usable up to 800 Cons: zoom a bit 'shorter in the paintings, menu commands, inconvenient, no optical viewfinder Opinion: I purchased this camera used in 2009 and I'm satisfied: it is lightweight yet sturdy, small in size but is used well, has very good optics, produces high-quality images at low ISO (up to 400), and still usable up 800 iso, then of course it depends also on the capacity in post production. It has the built-in flash, a good supply of comandi.rnI flaws that I personally have found are: rn1) Zoom a little 'short in telern2) Commands sub-menus not very immediatirn3) The exposure mode selector setting does not have the lock button so you can inadvertently spostarernrnProbabilmente, indeed certainly today the modern compact have better resolution, however, remains a good camera for street use or for those who have no special claims for portraits, landscape and travel photos. sent on July 06, 2013 |
 | Canon 5D Mark III Pros: image quality, sharpness, noise reduction, robustness, completeness commands and functions Cons: lack built-in flash and GPS (for now), software functions (certainly in the future!), a little 'dear Opinion: It 's my current camera. I think it's the ideal all-rounder fullframe (without going in the top series canon or nikon). RnrnOttima image quality, sharpness, noise reduction, fast, valuable autofocus, exposure latitude very buona.rnrnNon I gave 10 because it lacks a built-in flash (useful in some emergency situations) present in the competitor Nikon D800 and integrated gps present in smaller 6d. If he had these two equipment would have been my SLR definitiva.rnTemo, as often happens, that in the future they will come out SLR cameras with further implementations at the level of software that certainly will not be relevant, but, considering the cost of purchase is not indifferent, I confirm that for now the manufacturers are just cash cows to the last sent on June 14, 2013 |
 | Canon 5D Mark II Pros: excellent resolution, image quality, color rendition and noise reduction Cons: Autofocus is not in line with competitors, built-in flash Opinion: I have used this camera for 3 years from December 2009 to December 2012. I was soddifattissimo from the image quality and reduce noise. The controls are well organized, the camera has the clean-sensor, live view and the ability to make videos in full HD. rnDi against lack of built-in flash and some hardware features present in the most recent full frame like the double slot or a more modern generation autofocus and software (double exposure, hdr, etc. etc.). I think it's still a full frame camera of all respect and recommend it to anyone who wants a robust full-frame, specializing in landscape, macro, travel reportage, photo studio, where the autofocus is not critical and where it is important to the quality and sharpness Taken sent on June 14, 2013 |
 | Canon 5D Pros: image quality, sharpness, pixel ratio / size Cons: Today a little 'outdated compared to other full-frame, lack of built-in flash Opinion: I used this camera for a year and a half and I'm still very satisfied. It offers excellent image quality and sharpness even with optical non-canon or at least not at the top. Unfortunately my copy, bought used in November 2008 was no longer reliable because the previous owner had used a lot. Robust, with controls at the right place, still recommend it to anyone who wants to delve today in the world of full-frame without opening a mutuo.rnCerto did not clean the sensor, live view is a bit 'slow to record images and l' autofocus is simplified, but it is Highly recommended for landscapes and architecture. sent on June 14, 2013 |
 | Canon 300D Pros: Light weight and maneuverability Cons: Obsolescence Opinion: It was my first digital SLR camera. The bought in 2005 and used the rivendetti in June 2006. I took my first photos with a minimum of knowledge of the facts (at the same time attending a photography course organized by a circle of well-known photographers of Turin). For its time churning out pictures with good sharpness. The rivendetti to buy the 30d as for my needs was necessary for a camera with a better command configuration (in fact, the 300d was devoid of multi-ring present in the canon SLR upper class). Today I would say that is outdated in everything and think it makes sense to use it only for special purposes (infrared) or in special situations (where it is not ensured the safety of the camera like the carnival in Ivrea). sent on June 14, 2013 |
 | Canon 30D Pros: Overall quality of the camera body, right compromise between handling and ruggedness, good quality files in normal shooting conditions Cons: Today is deprived of many basic functions Opinion: I got this camera from 2006 to 2009, I made memorable shots, I can say that I format with this camera, I have reluctantly discarded at the end of 2009 to monetize in order to buy the 5D Mk II. I can say that pretty much ready files provided in normal shooting conditions, some problems with the management of the white balance. Today is now obsolete as a second body but I still think consigliabilissima. sent on March 06, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
