|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Grekez www.juzaphoto.com/p/Grekez  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon D4 Pros: I think the most beautiful sensor Nikon has made. Professional all-round. Cons: Nothing at all, maybe noisy jerk in the gusts and, only those who take mental blows, the 16mpx Opinion: Guys this has been the undisputed Queen for several years. The Megan Fox (of the early days) of the cameras of the early 2010s (in fact released in 2012). Professional, everything in its place. The most beautiful sensor I've seen even now in 2024, in my opinion, that Nikon(Sony) has ever created. They should make a Monument to this car along with the D700. Light files, fantastic colors, blah blah blah all things they have already said. Would I recommend it to anyone even in 2024? Not to anyone but to a good part yes. Definitely not to those who want a machine over 30 mpx who want to see the hair. For the rest, yes, it really has everything. it still has a flaw. it still costs too much for the years it has, and unfortunately spare parts are no longer easy to find. Anyway vote 10 sent on August 29, 2024 |
 | Nikon D700 Pros: As everyone has indicated in previous years Cons: 98% framing Opinion: Had over the years, then resumed a few years ago. They have already said everything about every single thing both pros and cons. It is the camera par excellence! I took it back a few years ago because I love it in every way. He takes photos that I think are very real. Together with the D4 they are the cars that I liked the most. Some will say: yes, but it's a 2008 machine. Now we are in 2024, there are cars three times as much. Of course, and you can see, but when you have a certain feeling with something, it can also be post-war, you don't care. the only flaw in my opinion is perhaps the 98% framing and if one is behind even the ISO, because more than 1600 does not hold but it's fine. Would I recommend it to anyone in particular? Yes also in 2024, for those who want to spend little, max 350 euros. even newbies who want a full frame. Obviously you can't do crops on it (we are always talking about a 12mpx machine). Anyway rating 9.5 sent on August 29, 2024 |
 | Tamron 17-35mm f/2.8-4 Di OSD Pros: All do, light to be a zoom. Excellent sharpness but never as a fixed. Exceptional value for money. Cons: Mah maybe the sharpness but against a fixed. Opinion: Spectacular lens a very light zoom for landscape and street. Vignette slightly at full opening as they have already said but nothing serious. I had several zoom and fixed wide angles. I must say it loses a bit 'with the latest generation fixed (Sigma art- Nikon G) but with the zoom does not lose anything indeed sometimes even better. I also had the 15-30 2.8 1' I did not see all this difference except for the weight. Even with 14-24 Nikon indeed perhaps the latter even a little worse. So for me a well-deserved 9.5! Brava tamron! sent on May 09, 2023 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
