|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Two_Evo www.juzaphoto.com/p/Two_Evo  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Leica Macro-Elmar-R 100mm f/4 Pros: Price, construction, image quality, color rendition, character in out of focus Cons: Loss of contrast with side light Opinion: A superb goal. Great at each distance and with a correction of chromatic aberration that surprising. It is not an apo but it's close, at least in the area of focus. Very nice yield in the portrait, and landscape. The aperture only f/4 may sound limiting but is sufficient in most uses. Clearly nn is an optical to use in low light. However it is definitely a lens that has character. The focus is simple, especially in coil version. The only drawback the side light: causes a loss of contrast. You can avoid putting a hand to cover the light source. A perspective that I recommend to anyone looking for a good 100 mm without breaking the Bank sent on April 28, 2018 |
 | Nikon D3400 Pros: Very light body, cost, image quality, battery life, limited but functional autofocus Cons: Pentaspecchio viewfinder, limited Snapbridge, JPG a little flat, integrated Flash not very functional Opinion: I had this camera tested by nikon for some time. In my opinion it is a great entry level camera. It offers everything you need to the amateur photographer who wants to approach the world of photography without spending a capital, with an excellent performance in those that are the majority of common life needs. Clearly this camera has many limitations to be able to keep such a low cost, but Image quality is pretty much the same as higher-end APS-C cameras. It can therefore be a valuable companion for many adventures, even with the 18-55 kit that gave me a try. in my opinion, however, it is better to combine it at least at 18-105 Nikkor (to be taken in kit) and a 35 f / 1.8 DX (to be purchased separately). Together with these two objectives it will be possible to learn how to photograph without having too many limitations.rnYou can find my full review on my website. sent on December 17, 2017 |
 | Samyang 12mm f/2.0 NCS CS Pros: Lightweight, bright, sharp, economical Cons: AC, hail loop Opinion: Very solid construction and good yield. Only faults are the ACs in the backlight and the hood of poor quality compared to the rest. My specimen has the very precise and fluid maf ring. The diaphragms are handled perfectly without too much trouble. Good at night and in low light. On a6000 works very well, and along with it is a very compact Wide.rnFitted to everyone? I do not think ... Because the manual focus and the fixed focus make it suitable only to those who are used to it.rnIt is definitely advised given the sale price. sent on July 01, 2017 |
 | Minolta AF 200mm f/2.8 G APO HS Pros: Sharpness, Construction, Flare Resistance, AF Speed, Global Quality, Weight, Integrated Lens Hood Cons: Nobody Opinion: In my opinion one of the best 200mm ever. Starburst, optical quality at the top. Zero vignetting, distortion, AC virtually null, High resolution. The all with a really impressive AF: fast and accurate. RnThe best Minolta optics along with the "Macro twin" .rnI can only weave the praise of this optic that has distorted my way of thinking and doing photography. It also supports the 2x multiplier, becoming a 400 f / 5.6 from the weight below the kilo . sent on June 19, 2017 |
 | Samyang 10mm f/2.8 ED AS NCS CS Pros: Focal, construction, sharpness, low distortion, price Cons: Nothing screw filters, no contact Opinion: The lens itself is excellent from every point of view: sharpness, color, ease of use, control of the coma, distortion, flare, ghosting etc. Seeing is believing ... It lends itself well to all usi..unica what no filters ... and no contacts. the lens is manual focus ... but on a 10mm would be virtually useless ... and only one way to increase costs and pesi.rnConsigliata to all those who are also astronomical photography wide field, but also to landscapers who are willing to invest in a slab filter system sent on March 22, 2017 |
 | Sony Alpha 2.0x Teleconverter Pros: Small, lightweight, cost used vehicle Cons: It goes well with good lenses, adds several AC, slow down a little the AF Opinion: A great Tc. Lightweight and easy to assemble / disassemble provides optimum performance. It should be clearly matched to start working out very slow, and at least aperture F / 2.8. Slow down a little the focus speed, but not significantly, especially when used together with the focus limiter, some lenses feature, or an appropriate AF RANGE function that acts as a virtual limiter "" of the distances focus. Introduces many AC ma..con few clicks you can correct any post produzione.rnConsigliato? surely if you want to remain light and still have a good canvas. I advise you to match it to the 200 f / 2.8 or 300 f / 2.8 and use the 1.4x over other optical sony / minolta sent on March 22, 2017 |
 | Sony 85mm f/2.8 SAM Pros: Cost, quality, focus, weight Cons: AC Ta, plastic Opinion: For portraits taken on APS-C, it behaves very well. Paid nonsense .. hard to better this prezzo.rnL'ottica definitely worth a lot, it is soft blurry. The AC is easily corrected in post production (shooting in RAW). rnVolendo stand then light it is virtually impossible to find better. If you do not need a push opening you can also use them instead of more famous lenses without any regret. sent on January 08, 2017 |
 | Minolta AF 135mm f/2.8 Pros: Sharpness also to TA, the focus speed, construction, weight, built-in hood, Filters 55mm, price Cons: Focal difficult to manage on APS-C, better on FF Opinion: Lens nothing short of excellent, really cheap (around a hundred Euros), and has an incredible sharpness already TA, used with the tubes becomes a discrete macro. On portraits provides a very soft blurry. Its construction is excellent: all metal. The weight is very low, and a feeling of incredible solidity. The great feature is then its built-in hood, convenient and easy to use! Monta filters 55, which are cheap, and allows for great creativity. Only problem turns out to be long in the internal and external short in on APS-C, while on Currency British FF can be an alternative to the STM 135 and the carlomagno (135mm f1.8) sent on December 21, 2016 |
 | Sony DT 35mm f/1.8 SAM Pros: quality / price ratio, openness, clarity already in TA, blurry, fast-focusing lens, macro ratio of 1: 4 Cons: plasticky Opinion: excellent lens for what it costs: the price-quality ratio really embarrassing. A choice almost obliged if you want a normal: why spend more when this lens delivers all the quality needed? Personally I use it often as the only lens in the outputs where I want to be light, you can do everything; street, portraits, little macro driven, creative shots, reportage, etcrnInoltre as many chances to play in the blurry, and allows shooting in poor lighting conditions. Purchase super advised sent on December 21, 2016 |
 | Sony A68 Pros: Ergonomics, High ISO for APS-C, AF speed and accuracy, tilting screen, Viewfinder, stabilized sensor Cons: Given the price no one, to be picky the lack of contacts for BG: who buys it already knows what. Opinion: A complete and functional machine, but his work well when combined with the right goals according to their taste. I tried it with many different lenses and I have always enjoyed it, never having any problems. Good yield at high ISO, up to 6400 (by exposing well) you can do even prints 20x30. Its best in my opinion from him with a fixed focal lenses: bring out really the best that the machine's sensor can give! What else to say except that the stabilizer is integrated really comfortable: all the old Minolta lenses can be used without fear of micro-moved with the times that sometimes leave surprised! RnAttenti you can not mount the battery grip, this in my opinion is the side only negativo.rnrn sent on December 21, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
