|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Claudio Molinari www.juzaphoto.com/p/ClaudioMolinari  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 L Macro IS USM Pros: All Cons: Nothing Opinion: I must say that I am in love with this view. I use it improperly because we only take pictures of portraits, but its engraving, sharpness and versatility is unmatched. It is the most "senior" lens of my outfit, in the sense that I bought it and never resold it. The Straconsiglio, also to those who say and claims that it is not suitable for portraiture. sent on June 07, 2019 |
 | Fujifilm XF 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR Pros: Versatility, sharpness, compactness Cons: The zoom ring is a bit harsh Opinion: I had this zoom to then change it with the pair 18-55 + 55-200, gaining in tele, focal that I use most. I liked the fact of going out light, with a optics all in all versatile and sharp, even if it loses a bit ' to the maximum focal. This all-to do the advice for those who love all-in-one, is a good compromise without exceeding in anything, you feel free and without worries of changing the optics or not to have the right focal. sent on June 07, 2019 |
 | Canon 6D Mark II Pros: Display, AF Cons: Lack of Joystick. Opinion: So much has been said, so much has been written about this camera. rnRimanderei to dozens of posts for further information. I have been using it for about 4 months and I have upgraded from the 6D MK I.rnI advantages over the previous model are undoubtedly the articulated display and an AF worthy of the name, even if not yet aligned with the competition (Sony) .rnI noticed anyway a GD slightly lower than the MK I although it holds very well at high ISO and, on a practical level, there are no substantial differences and I do not consider it a counter to report.rnConsigliata sent on March 06, 2018 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.2 L USM Pros: Laying of floors; opening; bokeh; sharpness Cons: Not having it in stock Opinion: Great lens, floor clearing is great and has no equal. RnMolte reviews give it less clear than 50mm Sigma, it may be, but the MF is spectacular, fast, precise.rn I use it on FF and I have to say that I often go out with this optic and return home always satisfied, great everything Do, quality.rn sent on July 06, 2017 |
 | Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM Pros: Compactness, Macro, Price, Portability, Lightness Cons: I found it slightly crisp, not mountable FF Opinion: I was looking for a ML for travel and portability. rnHo thought of buying the Canon EF-S 24mm STM and leave him permanently mounted on my Canon 700D.rnIl result is a compattona not particularly portable, but for my needs go bene.rnL'ottica is light, mounted on the reflex disappears, the price, bought used, it is reasonable and you do not have svenare.rnSinceramente I do not find it particularly clear; raw materials be processed and quality, but maybe I'm used differently, especially since this is my Canon optics alone is not L of my trousseau. Excellent macro function. RNA compared with his brother Canon 40mm STM, and had sold because too "long" for my needs on APS-C, I find that the latter is much sharper and limpido.rnInfine I find the major failing of not being able to mount FF, sin . always speak of photographs, videos do not take them into account and I can not make a judgment. sent on September 07, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM Pros: Sharpness, Tropicalization, to flare Resistance Cons: Nobody Opinion: I join the chorus of those who praise this light. RNLA I own a few weeks of FF and I find it pretty spectacular. rnRispetto the Canon EF 17-40mm I noticed, apart from the most lightning-fast AF and the presence of the stabilizer, a resistance to flare and unique fabulous. rnih critical light conditions can give some good photographs. To have in your kit. sent on September 06, 2016 |
 | Canon 700D Pros: Swiveling display, touch screen, excellent jpg files, managing high iso. Cons: Plastics Opinion: I replaced my 550D. I find a lot of differences, especially the swiveling display and 'useful and effective, then, to be a APSC, if you turn up the iso is possible to obtain manageable files. Jpg The result machinable. The only drawback plastics which, although of good quality, are always the same, all the way from 350D. I think it's a good second body, in addition to a FF or a APSH, as in my case. Used with a 40mm becomes a compact class, even if the body is not of the smaller and lighter. sent on March 23, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 500mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Stabilizer, free-hand, image quality Cons: Price, weight when compared with the version f4, 5 L Opinion: I bought the Canon EF 500mm f4, 5 L USM. The pictures do not justify the purchase and always had my doubts at high magnifications, especially as the definition. After you've tried, tried and wanted, in the end I got the IS version. The improvement is remarkable and the weight is increased, but the stabilizer does its job very well and can shoot freehand. I am very satisfied. It is a considerable investment in money, for me, but fully rewarded. I use it on both APS-C (7D) and on APS-H and with the latter, although we are talking about 1D Mark II N, I have the best shots. In my opinion optical indispensable for birds and fotonaturalistica, sports and action shots is rather too long, unwieldy and unwise, better contact the 300mm f2, 8. Excellent with multipliers, especially the series III. A greeting. sent on October 25, 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
