RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Frankieb
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Frankieb



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Frankieb


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

fujifilm_x_pro2Fujifilm X-Pro2

Pros: beautiful, super commands easy to find, nice viewfinder, it holds up very well in hand

Cons: high price

Opinion: I just picked up this machine I immediately had a good feeling, which I do not happen with sony a6000, if they did an x-pro2 full frame would take it on the fly, we hope we think, sin does not have the reclining rear display, aftertaste very apt also the button to switch from the rear display to the very intelligent viewfinder, sony has developed a sensor that consumes the battery in no time!

sent on November 14, 2016


sony_zeiss16-70_f4Sony Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS

Pros: light

Cons: of Zeiss has only the blue stamp, slightly crisp, expensive for the quality that has,

Opinion: call zeiss it takes a lot of courage! for the quality that should cost half of the half, I use it on a sonya6000 and between the machine and the lens does not know who the worst, compared with photos taken with a Canon D10 and 16-35 f 2.8 Lusm wins the canon great, I'm talking about a 16 year old car does! rnspero in sony will understand they have to do one zeiss dedicated to APSC as the a600 with 2,8f opening and with quality lenses, so even a little 'longer heavy but quality if no photos are disgusting! best to use a RX100 iii that falls short of very little, as the quality of prints, the a6000 with Zeiss 16-70mm however you put it in your pocket !!!! rnio if I were you expect to come out something new on the market! Save!

sent on November 02, 2016


nikon_20-35_f2-8dNikon 20-35mm f/2.8 D IF

Pros: historic objective of nikon, solid, unbreakable, excellent quality

Cons: blurs the edges of her closest rival the 16-35 L usm canon is superior as optical yield slow and noisy autofocus canon above it!

Opinion: very good lens quality, indestructible, compact small dimensions. I took anywhere from Liberia to Somalia from Sudan to Thailand! blurs the edges, however good the aperture ring that lets you make small corrections on the fly! I have bought just come out and I still have it, I should have it checked after 20 years of use!

sent on November 02, 2016


canon_16-35Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L USM

Pros: excellent for reportage photoessay

Cons: nobody

Opinion: l I bought in 2001 and I use it again, this year 2016 I did revise the canon, has toured around the world in truly difficult situations from the desert of Sudan to the forest of Burundi, from the beaches of Somalia to the Congo River! I can not figure out who wrote that overexpose !!! used both with analog and with digital! only thing I do not like is that you can not do because the hyperfocal does not report any data on the lens!

sent on November 02, 2016




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me