RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

AlbertoGiovanni
www.juzaphoto.com/p/AlbertoGiovanni



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by AlbertoGiovanni


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

pentax_16-45Pentax SMC DA 16-45mm f/4 ED AL

Pros: Optical quality

Cons: Length at 16mm

Opinion: Great lensCost little, optically good, average design quality, better than 18-55 and 16-50 f 2.8 for surrender The only flaw is that it stretches too far to the wide angle, I like the AF lenses insideForce was built like the 16- 50 would have been perfect Overall rating 8.5rnPs is optically superior to the so famous Canon 17-40 but you know, series l you can not criticize ......

sent on October 09, 2017


tamron_af17-35Tamron AF 17-35mm f/2.8-4 Di Ld IF

Pros: Little cost, and a lens they have in a few, at 17mm and 'f2. 8

Cons: Responsiveness, construction, being not labeled Canon or Nikon and having no ultrasonic autofocus will be denigrated a priori

Opinion: As already stated, and an old generation Tamron, although optically knocking Canon's 17-40 and costing half is discarded, it would be sold for several years, slicing one of those slow loses and underestimating, certainly defects are not new: no constant brightness and plasticosarn construction (like having a big saloon with poor seats and utility tires)

sent on October 05, 2017


olympus_e520Olympus E-520

Pros: An alternative to canon and NikonrnValida for macros because of the smallest full frame sensor

Cons: Small, low-beam sensor Only max 1600rnAutofocus only at 3 points

Opinion: It handles very well if it is used with so much Light at low iso sforna file bellissimirnIn Low light conditions it behaves as a compact, it serves I'll flashrnThe kit goals are great, I'll menu and complete, I'll stabilize sensor, great I'll park lentirnInsomma if you do not pass iso 1000 and do not sport is a good alternative to canon and nikonrnrn solutes

sent on September 18, 2017


canon_1300dCanon 1300D

Pros: It costs a little, it's light, you can fit all the canon lenses

Cons: Viewfinder Coverage Not 100%

Opinion: If you buy a panda at 8000 euros you expect it to be 200 per hour and have leather interior? This is the 1300d; you have everything you need to get great photos with so many limits: high iso, burst, shutter duration , Robustness, no top lcd, few autofocus points only a serious defect for a car in this band is the lens cover not 100%, in some situations the photos are wrong because you never know what you can "take" on the edges external

sent on August 21, 2017




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me