|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
AndreaRavanetti www.juzaphoto.com/p/AndreaRavanetti  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon D750 Pros: High ISO hold, colors, adjustable screen, general robustness, AF precision, U1 and U2 modes Cons: Square viewfinder, position of some commands (but there are shortcuts) Opinion: Coming from a D700, the transition was certainly the best: better files (but heavier, paying attention to the computer), very loyal colors, excellent jpeg quality, depth of file. RnrnThe tilting screen does not leave without any doubt: resistance? The machine is given for tropicalized, but the screen does not mean anything else, especially in a way not to change it after a while. But we will see if treated with care should not have any problems. RnrnWord Commands? To get used to it, but worse than expected: at first impact seem midway rather than semi pro, but the set of presonations is very high (for example, iso checking is originally on a button next to the main screen , However, the "rec" button can be set in photo mode as ISO control, making it in fact very similar to the D700 as overall controls). RnrnVery valid (as in all recent Nikon reflexes) the possibility ofCustom U1 and U2 modes, great when you make different shots at near moments rnrn sent on April 28, 2017 |
| Nikon D750 Pros: High ISO hold, colors, adjustable screen, general robustness, AF precision, U1 and U2 modes Cons: Square viewfinder, position of some commands (but there are shortcuts) Opinion: Coming from a D700, the transition was certainly the best: better files (but heavier, paying attention to the computer), very loyal colors, excellent jpeg quality, depth of file. RnrnThe tilting screen does not leave without any doubt: resistance? The machine is given for tropicalized, but the screen does not mean anything else, especially in a way not to change it after a while. But we will see if treated with care should not have any problems. RnrnWord Commands? To get used to it, but worse than expected: at first impact seem midway rather than semi pro, but the set of presonations is very high (for example, iso checking is originally on a button next to the main screen , However, the "rec" button can be set in photo mode as ISO control, making it in fact very similar to the D700 as overall controls). RnrnVery valid (as in all recent Nikon reflexes) the possibility ofCustom U1 and U2 modes, great when you make different shots at near moments rnrn sent on April 28, 2017 |
 | Nikon 1 V1 Pros: Weight, the presence of the viewfinder (not to be underestimated), made at low ISO, 2.7x crop factor, burst. Cons: Ergonomic grip without, resolution (10 mega sometimes are very few, however, there is the crop factor). Opinion: quality / price ratio of the new tremendous, but in used is 2-300 complete euro lens and maybe grip, and then it becomes very good. rnrn10 mega scarce, making it difficult to crop an image, but you must always consider the sensor size. In relation to these are good, you have to look the shot well. Electronic rnrnMirino essential in my opinion in a mirrorless, makes it possible to use even in difficult light conditions where the LCD tends to be difficult to read. rnrnAutofocus adequate (not a missile), made at high ISO of course so-so, but acceptable for the sensor. rnrnConsigliata to those who want to fit lenses Nikon F "multiplying" by the FT1, which with the center point maintains the AF, or who wants to turn light. rnNel second case recommend the excellent 18.5 F1.8 (50mm equivalent), comfortable, lightweight, quality sent on November 21, 2016 |
 | Nikon D7100 Pros: Construction, Double SD slot, speed and precision AF, pro commands, resolution, internal AF motor Cons: Lack access (maybe), buffers Opinion: Excellent machine, never missed a beat. The highest level, perfect controls, accurate and fast autofocus, ability to adjust in the room for the AF single-lens. rnRisoluzione excellent, making it to perfection with high quality lenses. It bursts good, but a little buffer 'poor compared, nothing serious though, just take the measures. rnUn'APS-C certainly good, well built, consigliatissima. sent on November 21, 2016 |
 | Nikon D5100 Pros: Lightweight, rotatable display, resolution Cons: Tenuta ISO, entry-level commands Opinion: It 'was my first camera and gave me great satisfaction. rnAccoppiata with 35mm 1.8G allows to have an excellent car to a very low weight, plus the ability to rotate the display, sometimes very convenient. rnTenuta adequate iso for an APS-C-2011, of course you can not expect results from FF or most modern SLR, however, perfectly acceptable. rn sent on November 21, 2016 |
 | Nikon D700 Pros: impeccable construction, ergonomics, color rendering, file lightness, held iso (considered the year), FF, in used price. Cons: Machine of 2008, to the present (2016): shutter sound, resolution (12 megapixels), lack of wi fi. Opinion: Machine made in 2008 but still very valid and superior to most Nikon SLR on the market (obviously not the D5). rnFile lightweight but very clean, perfect for any online use and adequate for normal prints. You can reliably work in the case of services with many photos: the speed at which they process from 24mega up files (RAW) is far below the 60 megs of a D810, obviously this is a pro like speed, a counter if you need to crop the photo. rnTenuta high ISO up to 3200, acceptable to 6400 (with a little 'noise reduction becomes great), well you feel that they are not native ISO. rnResa color and autofocus of the highest level, in my opinion better than a D600 / 610, especially nell'autofocus (more spaced points). rnrnLa still consider myself a good car, now above all at great prices. sent on November 21, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
