|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Palmy www.juzaphoto.com/p/Palmy  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon D810 Pros: Image quality Cons: White Balance! Opinion: I do not repeat what others wrote about quality, obviously a beautiful car and in the studio then becomes sublime. But when used in the evening, or in conditions in which white balance is relied upon are pains. It shades on yellow and the complexions become very bad. In the evening in the wedding puts me in a lot of trouble. sent on June 16, 2019 |
 | Nikon D7200 Pros: Well-made Body, sturdy and ergonomic, idem autofocus Cons: It Makes plastic photos, I don't know how to define them, then the JPEGS are mixed. Opinion: I've already said it all in the cons. They Look beautiful files only if you have not seen anything else. Bought and sold after a week. Much better at equal price a D700, at least it's a FF. Too Bad because the body is done well, even the noise of the shutter is discreet. It'S like designing a beautiful car but then going astray. sent on March 24, 2019 |
 | Nikon D750 Pros: All Cons: I don't know Opinion: I decided to give my opinion after using it for many years and still use it. I state that I used almost all Nikon, from the D200 onwards. Currently I have held those that I think are the best bodies, D750 and D3s. I also have Sony and XT2, but in the end I always take her, the 750. Because? Because it is smaller and lighter than the Admirals, Sony have the targets that cost a blunder, and the Fuji as beautiful it churn out files too heavy and every time I have to do file conversions, etc... If I want to do street with fixed D series remain small and light almost like the Fuji, if I have to push to the maximum with the quality I mount an Art and the and begins the pleasure. It has the right amount of pixels, very workable files, fast and reliable, dynamic range and exceptional ISO. It's not specific to just one photographic scope, but it does anything, and it does it right. For me, the number 1 remains. The videos? I'm not my problem, with the camera I take pictures! sent on February 07, 2019 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 G II Pros: Lightness, general quality, dimensions. Cons: Nobody Opinion: It is my first review, and I make it precisely for this so criticized optics, but in my opinion genius. Using Machine Pro, D750, D3s, in addition to XT2, Sony... I do professional work, so I'm not a novice. I've always discarded it because only a 18/55, then plastic... If I have to get out I take better optics. Well, just this is his strength, lightness and quality of his files. Today you are looking for mirrorless to reduce clutter and weight and then you criticize an optics like this. Today I tested it with a D200 at 2000 meters altitude under a crazy snow. Completely wet. The XT2 also with me I left it in the bag. I didn't trust you. The D200 but especially this 18/55 completely soaked did not flinch. I did all the service without any problem. Yet it is not weather sealed. Just the fact of being small, light and plastic has made its strength. So I wonder, maybe Nikon had seen us away but no one understood. I started from the D200 and from 18/55 and then come back after many years. sent on December 31, 2018 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
