|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Vittoriovir www.juzaphoto.com/p/Vittoriovir  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC OS HSM Macro C Pros: Dimensions, robustness, sharpness, focal range Cons: Almost nothing... Opinion: Great handyman goal for performance - price ratio. Sharp, fast AF, fairly bright. I use it on the D7200 and it's compact and robust. Much versatile goes from portraits, to landscapes, to street and interior, without any big problems. Good color hold even in backlight. Sigma snoops a bit in defining it as Macro but actually also photographs it from 20 cm. Better than the 18-55 in the Nikon kit, it has more gear and not just for the range! Satisfied!! sent on November 14, 2017 |
 | Nikon D7200 Pros: high ISO estate, autofocus, dynamic range and tropical conditions, quality of construction, infinity of programs and combinations (perhaps too many) Cons: ... The price difference for the product Nikon UK ... Liveview not up to the rest Opinion: For an amateur photographer I think is the ultimate !! Moving from D3200 (for another excellent entry level) I enter a new world, a real semipro spotless! Good at high ISO sealing (at least until the mid / high) af precise and fast, good dynamic range. Well built and sturdy, practical even in many of the commands with the possibility of various customizations very useful and immediate. Profit for the 1.3x crop function that multiplies the magnification of 1/3. Equally posotivo the system of the creative flash with adjustable settings on the built-in flash. In my (very modest) alert among the industry top. To study before you understand all the features. Additional fees sent on February 17, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S 50mm f/1.8 G Pros: Brightness, focus, quality / price ratio, size, versatility Cons: (Maybe) lack stabilizer Opinion: From amateur can say: taken as the main lens of Nikon D7200 D3200 with 18/55 after transition from a kit. What can I say, I did not want any lens kit as I read this 50mm and I'm really impressed. In fact it is an excellent lens for portraits, interiors, street photos some views. It does not have the versatility of a zoom but has its own characteristics that make it appreciated for more. A bright lens, sharp, good color and then cheap (perhaps less than it's worth). He hood and pouch in kit. The AF does not disappoint, the ring of MF but not the best. All in all, from simple fan, a good lens and I would advise a little to those who dabble in photography without using kits millionaires or super-professional. Really pleased. sent on January 04, 2016 |
 | Tokina AT-X Pro 11-16mm f/2.8 DX II Pros: Bright, crisp, robust, fast AF Cons: Flare Opinion: State that I am an amateur and a professional. Objective I think really satisfying. Good brightness and sharpness. Fast AF and (I think) accurate. The ring for manual focus is a bit 'hard and the "system" to drive a bit' special but it does the hand. The flare is a common problem but the quality 'of optics is excellent. Used on the D3200 gave excellent results for both landscapes in photographs of interiors, pesantino to the camera body. The D7200 ... a blast !! Very much satisfied sent on January 03, 2016 |
 | Nikon D3200 Pros: Sensor size and weight, handling, functions Cons: Suffers above 400 ISO, controls almost all from the menu. Opinion: Used for two years with satisfaction. For me as "the new trade" and rest an amateur is a good gym. The menus scenes and help guide the way a lot and explain many basic photography. Used in kits with 18/55 and 55/300 I did a bit of practice to the satisfaction of all. However, beginning to explore ways ASM, you realize that missing the keys of important functions that you just browsing the menu. He suffers medium and high ISO. The wider the heavy is too small and the unbalanced weight. Took tokina 11/16 I realized that needed a breakthrough and switched to 7200. However excellent entry level (with the limitations of the case) very useful to learn the basics with good satisfaction. sent on January 03, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: Price, handling, focal structure Cons: Dim, AF slow and not always accurate especially after the 200 mm Opinion: Taken to the old 3200 with a kit for the 18/55 price and focal length very spddisfatto. After several shots the VR value that makes the difference. But very versatile: Little bright colors a bit dull, Unclear after the autofocus 200 and not always accurate. Over 300 serving patience. Anyway now I am using it on 7200, but you notice that something is missing. Do not change 'cause we do everything and to replace it should go to class with different costs! Overall not bad for amateur shots and beginners (like me) sent on January 03, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 G VR II Pros: Price, versatility, size. Cons: Dim Opinion: Purchased in kit form with the 3200. A good all-rounder for beginners (like me). Great gym for indoor photo, street even some macro. After two years I sold it along with the 3200 to 7200 transition lenses and more interesting. Good if taken in kit and get started. Since its sodfisfazioni. Not alone I would purchase. There are more interesting products at similar costs. sent on January 03, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
