|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Persio91 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Persio91  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Fujifilm FinePix HS30EXR Pros: Reflex commands, lots of zoom, ergonomics Cons: Sensor yield, kneaded images, random white balance. Opinion: I had this machine after a FinePix S1800 and before an EOS100D. I think it's worse than the S1800 but more versatile than the 100D. The biggest problem lies in the rendering of the images, they are very kneaded and with dominant green and magenta often meaningless. Used for about a year, few satisfactions, it was replaced by the EOS100D. sent on November 16, 2019 |
 | Canon 80D Pros: Autofocus, battery life, semipro, touchscreen, rotating display, burst, three-dimensional images. Cons: Nobody on the photos, lacking the 4k if they make videos. Opinion: Since I come from the 70D and in recent times I also tried the 700D and 1300D list of pro: rnrn- Autofocus: exceptional, 45 points cross and a very fast speed in the subject's engagement, rarely mistakes. Rn- Battery: is given to 900 and go jumps, you can actually use the car for days without recharging the battery.rn- Semipro body: the presence of the top LCD, semitropicalization and double ringer is really a plus, however in line with the band's competition of price.rn- Touchscreen: now indispensable, as well as the adjustable display.rn- Raffica: 7FPS for 15 continuous shots (I speak of RAWs), from 16th the machine slows to 2FPS as it saturates the buffer. Every RAW weighs 38MB, with JPG bursts of 7FPS unlimited.rn- Image quality: I thought 70D changed little and nothing and instead I got rid of files of amazing quality and sharpness, the performance jump is marked and obvious, not I would never have said it. I'm just against video mode but I leave pit's known that Canon does not excel in the APS-C, so up to 800ISO all right then the PP grain starts to notice. rnrnPrice at the time of review of 915 € (Guaranteed Market Guaranteed) for the body alone, I would say it's worth it all.rnrnThat last note I tell you that the car has taken a lot of snow and that for a day has not turned on. Put it on the thermo and drying it is then distributed smoothly. sent on November 16, 2017 |
 | Canon 70D Pros: Semipro, autofocus, burst body, double ring, adjustable screen, level, excellent light and shadow recovery, battery life. Cons: Noise over ISO 800, lights in the display are not reliable, 15-shot RAW buffers Opinion: I had this car for 1 year and 10 months, with her I did more than 50,000 shots and I'm currently waiting for the 80D. The 70D is an extremely interesting machine, bursting with 7FPS, 20mpx and 19 cross-over points. Its strength lies in the strength of the machine cover, durable but lighter than a 7D, the upper display is clear and all the necessary info and the two timing and diaphragm adjustment rings are indispensable. The battery makes about 900 shots, the screen is usually mounted on both 700D and 200D, the machine has a level and each function is quickly accessible. On the other hand, in my opinion, it has a buffer limited to 15 RAWs, with its burst saturated in two seconds, using 95mb / s SD quickly, but still does not go beyond 15 continuous shots. The high ISO grain is felt, especially by applying clarity and recovering shadows in post production. Overall, in its price range, it is the best in circulation, I really loved it, we hope the 80D gives the same satisfaction. sent on October 19, 2017 |
 | Sigma 10-20mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM Pros: Resistance to flare, construction, accessories, constant aperture at all focal lengths Cons: Distortion at 10mm diameter filter (82mm) Opinion: 9. For APS-C in my opinion is the best wide angle in circulation, the one with the highest value for the price is 10-18 Canon but is behind the door of the low-end limits (plasticky construction, variable aperture, this flare , lens hood separately), so I feel I recommend their purchase without thinking much. sent on April 05, 2017 |
 | Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM Pros: Lightness, clarity, cost, size Cons: Vignetting at F2.8 Opinion: I was looking for a lightweight solution for my 70D, I bought this 24mm because of the small size, I can now afford to have a car that weighs less than 1kg globally neck. The lens is very sharp, the focus works well (STM between things) and the prospect that returns thanks to the 35mm equivalent is really interesting. Your back thanks, take home the big shots with a very minimal expense. For 160 € is a best buy. sent on January 16, 2017 |
 | Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM Pros: Sharpness, construction, supplied accessories, constant aperture. Cons: Distorts the focal low, flare. Opinion: Excellent lens produced by Sigma, bought 340 € to replace 18-55 STM. High sharpness at all focal lengths, from F4 onwards becomes really sharp. Suffers a little 'flare against high lights, it is not recommended for demanding backlit but it is perfect with night lighting (not afraid of the street lamps). Fast focusing, solid and well-constructed goal, it very well on APS-C, distorts, a bit 'between 17 and 20mm, but nothing serious. I think in the price range in which it is located is the best buy. sent on November 08, 2016 |
 | Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Pros: Central sharpness, quick focus, threading for filters Cons: Hood not included (costs 40 €), poor sharpness at the edges, build quality Opinion: Lens in my opinion mediocre (probably flawed), I found an excellent focus in the center, great colors and excellent contrast but a loss of quality to high edges up to F10 / 11. As owner of the 10-18STM, at least 70D, I prefer the latter. Construction plasticky, bayonet iron but plastic lens (the same of 10-18). For what it costs, I think, it is better to focus on the competition. sent on May 13, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
