|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Maxligr777 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Maxligr777  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon D300 Pros: Robustness, tropicalization safe from everything, professional, excellent sensor and AF, remarkable files, controls at your fingertips. Very long-lasting machine. Cons: The live view control in the shot dial correct in the D300s with dedicated button. Lack of a double card that is present in the D300s. Opinion: I had the D500 for 9 years, and when I tried the D300 and 300s I sold it to get them both moreover at really ridiculous prices, perfect bodies at about 8000 shots each. Many will say that it is madness, but no, it was a targeted and well-thought-out choice: these are 2 dated cameras, but professional and always current: when you pick them up and use them you understand that they have everything to make you fall in love, they are solid, powerful cameras, for those who really love photography, I have been photographing since 1979, and I have had from F2, to FM2, FE2, FA, and so on. The D500 is a remarkable and technically very advanced body and has a thousand cutting-edge features, including 20.9 megapixels, but these two cameras give a feeling of robustness and simplicity that the D500 has never given me. The 12.3 megapixels are more than enough even to make fabulous enlargements, and the famous noise at high ISO up to 1600 by setting the noise control to NORMAL and sharpness 7-8, is not perceived and is identical to the D500, which over 1600 has the same problems as the D300 and D300s. These two cameras (D300 and D300s) are cameras for those who want to take real photography without running after megapixels, and all the other devilry that they submit to us, such as the iso at 51,200 completely unusable, I remind you that we took splendid photographs with the FE2, FM2, which did not have autofocus, and only the average exposure with a prevalence of center. It should be added that there are professional photographers who are still using these two cameras. sent on April 30, 2025 |
| Nikon D300 Pros: Robustness, tropicalization safe from everything, professional, excellent sensor and AF, remarkable files, controls at your fingertips. Very long-lasting machine. Cons: The live view control in the shot dial correct in the D300s with dedicated button. Lack of a double card that is present in the D300s. Opinion: I had the D500 for 9 years, and when I tried the D300 and 300s I sold it to get them both moreover at really ridiculous prices, perfect bodies at about 8000 shots each. Many will say that it is madness, but no, it was a targeted and well-thought-out choice: these are 2 dated cameras, but professional and always current: when you pick them up and use them you understand that they have everything to make you fall in love, they are solid, powerful cameras, for those who really love photography, I have been photographing since 1979, and I have had from F2, to FM2, FE2, FA, and so on. The D500 is a remarkable body and has a thousand cutting-edge features, including 20.9 megapixels, but these two cameras give a feeling of robustness and simplicity that the D500 has never given me. The 12.3 megapixels are more than enough even to make fabulous enlargements, and the famous noise at high ISO up to 1600 by setting the noise control to NORMAL and sharpness 7-8, is not perceived and is identical to the D500, which over 1600 has the same problems as the D300 and D300s. These two cameras (D300 and D300s) are cameras for those who want to take real photography without running after megapixels, and all the devilry that they submit to us for commercial purposes, such as iso at 51,200, I remind you that we took splendid photographs with the FE2, FM2, which did not have autofocus, and only the average exposure with a central predominance. It should be added that there are professional photographers who are still using these two cameras. sent on April 30, 2025 |
 | Nikon D300s Pros: Robustness, tropicalization safe from everything, professional, excellent sensor and AF, remarkable files, controls at your fingertips. Very long-lasting machine. It is the completion of the D300. Cons: Nothing and nothing, except the fact that they don't do it anymore. As for videos, if I want to do them, I buy the camera. Opinion: I had the D500 for 9 years, and when I tried the D300 and 300s I sold it to get them both moreover at really ridiculous prices, perfect bodies at about 8000 shots each. Many will say that it is madness, but no, it was a targeted and well-thought-out choice: these are 2 dated cameras, but professional and always current: when you pick them up and use them you understand that they have everything to make you fall in love, they are solid, powerful cameras, for those who really love photography, I have been photographing since 1979, and I have had from F2, to FM2, FE2, FA, and so on. The D500 is a remarkable and technically very advanced body and has a thousand cutting-edge features, including 20.9 megapixels, but these two cameras give a feeling of robustness and simplicity that the D500 has never given me. The 12.3 megapixels are more than enough even to make fabulous enlargements, and the famous noise at high ISO up to 1600 by setting the noise control to NORMAL and sharpness 7-8, is not perceived and is identical to the D500, which over 1600 has the same problems as the D300 and D300s. These two cameras (D300 and D300s) are cameras for those who want to take real photography without running after megapixels, and all the devilry that they submit to us such as the iso at 51,200 completely unusable, I remind you that we took splendid photographs with the FE2, FM2, which did not have autofocus and only the average exposure with a central predominance. It should be added that there are professional photographers who are still using these two cameras. sent on April 30, 2025 |
 | Nikon 80-200mm f/4 AI-s Pros: Sharpness, lenses that have made Nikon history at the highest level, solid, robust, excellent definition, magnificent portraits, on any occasion proves to be a great lens Cons: nothing Opinion: The average rating of 9.7 says a lot about this old generation Nikon lens, the one that made the brand famous and legendary. I use it with my D500 in manual focus and automatic aperture priority with medium reading with central or spot prevalence, and it's fun, fun, and always at the highest levels, for sharpness, contrast, colors, surprising definition. Its solidity and robustness, typical of AI-S lenses, is an unlimited guarantee. I tried multiple zooms of that range: from the AF 80-200 F. 2.8 Nikon onwards, but with a digital like the D500, if I went on this non-AF lens, there is a plausible reason: it has no rivals, also for its handling and weight contained in proportion to its characteristics. sent on January 13, 2023 |
 | Nikon AF 60mm f/2.8 D Micro Pros: Defined images, sharpness to the nth degree, beautiful colors, formidable macro, fast autofocus. Cons: nothing. Opinion: The average rating of 9.8 out of 10 does full justice to this excellent lens worthy of the Nikon name. I use it with my D500, which in DX is a 90, and for the macro it is the most desirable there can be. Top images throughout: sharpness, contrast, perfect detail, faithful colors and rendered perfectly, in the macro it is simply superb! Compared to other macro lenses both Nikon and not, it is really number one. sent on January 13, 2023 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 16-80mm f/2.8-4 E ED VR Pros: Sharpness, contrast, resolution, quick focus, high quality, compact and lightweight zoom in DX 24-120 valid for all occasions. Cons: The hood is not up to the lens. Opinion: I use it in tandem with the D500, and it's a winning pair. The images, from the telephoto to 120 on the right, to the wide angle 24, is always a truly excellent yield, comparable and competitive with the best and most expensive Nikon lenses even of fixed focal length. The sharpness is amazing, the colors fantastic, and the contrast at the highest level. I think that in a right kit can not miss, to keep tight. The average 9.2 rating seems to me little and is penalizing, for a lens that would certainly deserve a nice 9.6 minimum .... sent on January 13, 2023 |
 | Nikon D500 Pros: Camera of the highest level. Quality and numbers from a true Nikon flagship. Very complete in all respects. Robust and reliable at all times. Cons: Nobody. We miss that he also makes coffee, but it would be too much Opinion: I have Nikon cameras since 1980: FE2, FA, FM2 new, F801, F801s, D70, D90, and now D500. This camera is absolutely professional level, very close to the D5, very reliable, robust, complete, from the 30 s times. At 1/8000 sec. Vast ISO, 1/250 sec. flash sync, infinite functions, perfect and dynamic autofocus with a wide choice of options. In short, a Top camera. Commands and menus that are quick and easy to select. I don't think you can have more. Even about 21 megapixels are abundantly satisfactory for every need. I recommend it to everyone. It is found in the used and at good prices, considering that it is an expensive camera and with good reason. sent on August 23, 2022 |
 | Nikon D90 Pros: Solid, reliable, robust and long-lived, very complete with 12.3 Megapixels which is more than enough and with shutter speeds from 30 sec. To 1/4000 sec. and flash sync at 1/200 sec., AF accurate, and free of birth defects in that time did not reveal. For reliability and robustness recalls, in proportion to the old system stainless FE2. Cons: No ax to grind in this camera which is one of the major successes of Nikon digital SLR in terms of. Opinion: The D90 and 'still, though no longer in production, a camera full of all you need to do any kind of photos at any level. Furthermore it has a strength, solidity and reliability that the positioning is competitive in the used market. The 12.3 megapixels are fine and are more than enough to get photos and enlargements perfectly crisp and clear. It has nothing to envy the most expensive new cameras with more megapixels thousand. sent on November 27, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
