| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
|
 |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.
 |
Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS Pros: Build quality, sharpness, versatility, fixed f4 Cons: Perhaps bulk and weight Opinion: For me it is a perfect lens, it covers all the focal lengths I use the most. The build quality is really solid and excellent, and the sharpness is great. The autofocus is fast and accurate. The fact that it's f4 fixed and doesn't close when zooming in is good for me. One does not take this lens to have a 2.8, but to have the most versatile lens possible. However, the blur it reproduces is not bad at all. It certainly has its presence, it is not a small lens but I must say that for me it is a merit, visually it is a "nice" goal. sent on 22 Dicembre 2025 |
 |
Sony A7 III Pros: All Cons: Well, maybe the menu Opinion: I bought this A7III a month ago. I came from a Nikon D7200 and I must say that with this one it is a big leap forward. Build quality, speed, focus, everything seems better to me, even the quality of the file that comes out and the malleability of the raw are really remarkable. Perhaps the only worst aspect is the menu, which is truly immense and dispersive, certainly the abbreviations do not help. But in the end after a few days of use you can understand more or less all the functions, so it is not a real negative aspect. Many say that the viewfinder is poor, I actually feel good in it, it is responsive and very bright. sent on 22 Dicembre 2025 |
 |
Nikon AF-S DX 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: Versatile, good wide-angle, quality all-rounder Cons: Build quality, maybe a little dark but it depends on the uses Opinion: I've been using this lens for 5/6 months, I'm quite satisfied. The lens is sharp (not the top but for the price it's fine), very versatile and with a good wide angle (16 mm which is like having a 24 mm on full frame), on excursion you only take this lens and stop. It's a bit dark, classic f3.5, it depends on the uses, for landscaping you don't need to have wider apertures, at least for what I use it. The build quality is not the best, it must be treated well... sent on 20 Maggio 2024 |
 |
Nikon D7200 Pros: File Quality, Tropicalization, Ergonomics, Build Quality Cons: Exposure meter Opinion: I've had this SLR for a couple of months, socket used by RCE Foto. I must say that it is really well made, very solid body that gives you confidence even in the most extreme situations. I use it in the mountains and even under a snowfall and with temperatures well below -10°C it has not batted an eyelid. Tropicalization by PRO body. All the controls are in place, in a few minutes you can memorize the positions and you can use them without taking your eyes off the viewfinder. The files that come out of the machine are easily processed. The only negative aspect I found is the light meter, absolutely ineffective: in areas with strong brightness or where there is a lot of white it panics, in general it underexposes enough, I had to set the light meter to +0.7 to have photos that are not heavily underexposed. I don't understand why they had to put such a poor light meter on a machine of this level. Still highly recommended! Rating: 9 sent on 27 Novembre 2023 |
 |
Nikon 135mm f/3.5 Ai Pros: build quality, sturdiness, bokeh Cons: Maf away a bit 'long, maybe a dark coat. Opinion: I achieve this with my father. I use it recently but I have to say that is a really great goal, despite being only f / 3.5 provides a blurred beautiful and a very good sharpness already at full aperture. Obviously it is a lens of all manual, so better to use it with minimal subjects statici.rnMessa focus a bit 'longish, well 1.3 mt. sent on 07 Gennaio 2017 |
 |
Manfrotto 496 RC2 Pros: Price, build quality, capacity and reliability. Cons: For now nothing. Opinion: Using this head for a few months, coupled with MT290XTA tripod. Fully satisfied, both of the head of the tripod in general. The head in question is very reliable, a lockout once the screw is difficult to move, with proven equipment up to 3kg in precarious situation and with strong wind, and in any case has never ceduto.rnUtile also the presence of the clutch, in the case of having to use the free head, which allows a good fluidity controllabile.rnPer time riscontrato.rn no defect sent on 22 Novembre 2016 |
 |
Nikon 50mm f/1.4 Ai-s Pros: Vintage, grand opening, flawless construction, color, sharpness. Cons: Apart from the defects regarding my copy (I explain in comments), no. Opinion: This lens has given me my father and it was a pleasant surprise, f / 2.8 is a blade, very very sharp. impeccable construction as we do not see anymore. Unfortunately my specimen has been widely used and perhaps also abused, the rear lens has several scratches, so if use more diaphragms closed of f / 2.8 and the photo appears dull with very washed-out. If I can find a new specimen by little, I think I will replace it, is really a view that satisfaction. sent on 15 Maggio 2016 |
 |
Nikon D7000 Pros: semi-pro body, strength, construction, AF setting, viewfinder, etc.. Cons: ISO sealing perhaps, iso button not on hand. Opinion: I have this machine for about ten days and I'm liking enough. The body is well-built, robust and solid as a real semi-pro. The viewfinder is nice and big with 100% coverage. A quality level of the file nothing to say, maybe I expected something more on high ISO seal, but not much, the key to change the iso is not very easy, you have to press it to remove the left hand from under the lens . However coarse defects I still have not found it. For now satisfied completely. sent on 05 Febbraio 2016 |
 |
Nikon AF-S DX 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: Range of focal lengths, weight, compactness, great start. Cons: Distortion at 18 mm, construction, absence of references to the manual focus, non-tropical conditions. Opinion: decent quality goal, great start and it is a good kit lens. The focal range makes it suitable as a handyman and light weight allows you to take it below in any situation. Presents a bit 'of the minimum focal distortion and the construction is decidedly plasticky, the ring of the MAF does not seem robust, plus lack of references to the manual focus. The AF and stabilizer function well. I recommend it for those who are starting out. sent on 03 Febbraio 2016 |
 |
Canon PowerShot SX130 IS Pros: Full Manual mode, strength, good target although little bright and good zoom Cons: Poor seal already in ISO average but is a compact with a tiny sensor so we can stand. Shortly range of closing of the iris. Lack of viewfinder Opinion: This was the machine that made me fall in love and approach to photography. Has, in addition to the automatic settings, the possibility of being able to fully snap in manual, setting time, aperture, ISO and focus. Which is quite rare for a compact of this costo.rnL'obiettivo I found it quite good and with a good zoom, unfortunately, is not very bright (f / 3.4) and the diaphragm can close only up to f / 8.0 showing among other things in this closing lightly diffrazione.rnBisogna go easy on the ISO, since the 400 will definitely feel the noise, taking over 200 ISO only if one can not do without. And, unfortunately, given the low light lens this happens quite spesso.rnÈ built with good materials and feeling seems now very robust. I used it in the mountains with rain, snow and very cold temperatures but have never beaten ciglio.rnCompletamente satisfied. sent on 23 Novembre 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
