|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Ricky 88 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Ricky88  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tokina AF 17-35mm f/4 AT-X Pro FX Pros: build quality, minimal distortion even at 17mm, sharpness, brightness, distance close focus Cons: Step AF / MF sinecure Opinion: A great angle to an honest price. I use it on a Nikon d750. I bought it mostly for URBEX photographs, but actually I'm taking also mounted for other types of services. Angle really broad, remarkable sharpness, almost no distortion. It will not be 2.8 but it's still a bright lens. Missing stabilization but on such short focal length (17mm to 35mm) it is impossible to notice. I find it complicated the transition from manual to automatic fire because it is constructed in a way that I had never seen on other goals, but it's probably only a matter of habit. Note: a month after purchase came via a gold string 1mm thick that surrounded the goal. Not a prelude any funzionamente but it seemed strange because the lens to be the impression of being built really well. In any case, it recommended. sent on May 03, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S 24-120mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: Versatility, constant brightness Cons: Vignetting and distortion at 24mm Opinion: Bought in KIT with D750. As a handyman is more than adequate, I use it often in marriages because covers the total area on the first floor. The brightness fixing is definitely an advantage, as well as a discreet sharpness. A 24 mm vignetting and distortion, especially when photographing landscapes, are really annoying, but nothing that can not be corrected in post production (although it still throws off time to do it). All in all I would recommend it. sent on May 03, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
