|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Fabio Borile www.juzaphoto.com/p/FabioBorile  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon 6D Mark II Pros: High ISO hold, autofocus, swiveling display, excellent live view, 27 points maf to f8 Cons: No joystick, centered maf points in the center, 1/4000 Opinion: They are passed to FF coming from 7D so the jump has been remarkable in terms of image quality. Combined with L series optics, it guarantees excellent images with beautiful colors and excellent definition. The yield at high ISO is very good and the files are well workable. Autofocus is responsive and also works well in servo with moving subjects. With the tc to f8 keeps the AF on 27 points, in this case it slows down a bit but it is fully usable especially if used in zones (groups of 9 points). The possibilities of personalization are in line with the type of machine. The selection of points is not as practical as with reflexes equipped with a joystick. The maf points are 45 but remain very concentrated in the center, you can still focus even with the live view which also works very well. The shutter speed is limited to 1/4000 sec, personally I have never felt the need to go further. Ergonomics and weight? Now they are spreading the mirrorless ... In my opinionthe 6DMKII wins in ergonomics weighing only 150g more than a full frame ML. rn Considering that a FF is to be used with good objectives (often heavy) the advantage in terms of lightness of a ML would be felt little. rnThe sensor of the 6DII is not at the level of the latest Sony ... For this reason many have changed their brand ... I think that a Canon can enjoy a vast original optical park or compatible and an excellent service. Personally I remain loyal to Canon and I do not think the death of the SLR will be so imminent .... sent on March 01, 2018 |
 | Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM Pros: -Excellent value for money. -Lens hood and pouch included. -Well built. Cons: With my model reflected a drop in sharpness at the edges with diaphragms aperti.In especially the right edge. I am forced to shoot with small apertures to achieve good uniformity of sharpness between the center and edges. Opinion: -The difference in sharpness between the center and edges is a known problem on this goal, but there are marketing models that do not have this problem. (I have some doubts on how to face Sigma quality control.) For the rest of the lens is well built, presiso autofocus is quick and can be mounted filters. Do not suffer in the low light lens as I use it mostly for landscapes and shooting with tripod sent on September 25, 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
