|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Peterlad www.juzaphoto.com/p/Peterlad  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Samyang 85mm f/1.4 Aspherical IF Pros: build quality, sharpness, quality / price ratio, contrast, bokeh, great for portraits but not all. Maf manual easily accessible, TA except where it becomes more challenging. Cons: Maf challenging to TA, however well assisted with the focus peaking (Sony), care is needed. Small game in the still of the bayonet, not annoying. Opinion: (Version E-mount - red line) - The lens of the solid feel and robust, not so lightly. build quality of all respect, it is certainly not a Sony G but not bad at all. It seems like a Rokkor a bit 'more compact and light (and thank goodness!). RnGhiera focus is fluid at the right point, not hard and not too soft. To focus peaking even with ambient room light, in the evening, well contrasted already appears to TA, the maf at least for me, coming from analogue full-manual is not at all difficult, even less demanding than on other manuals / vintage lenses I own . rnCon Aperture 2.8 or more closed the lens behaves quite similar to many other quality paintings, with a maf manual at all difficult. A wider apertures with this focal pull out the photo you want to actually not everyone, or rather is not exactly "point and shoot". The shot must be studied well and very carefully chosen the maf point, and I find a welland that it is manual, because with a short depth of field to tissue paper should be chosen millimeter. RNLA slow but there is very sharp and contrasty as befits a quality canvas and you can see it very well closing of a stop, while TA the feeling is that the sharpness is so thin on the floor and then maf fades, what then is the effect sought in optical as portrait, which it is. Used to openings between f2 and f4 is particularly "enjoyable" for yield and bokeh.rnrnrn sent on November 12, 2016 |
 | Sony NEX 3N Pros: Small, essential in all, brilliant, economic. Price / stratospheric price, yield sensor. Suitable for optical economic not of very high yield 16-50PZ, Sony 16 f2.8, f2.8 20. Battery like any other NEX or ILCE APSC and FF. Cons: Appreciable noise since iso not particularly high, lack flash shoe, feels the lack of viewfinder given the overall quality of the product. Minimum value ISO200, a little 'limiting Opinion: The custom took as second body combined all'A6000, then transferred to my son then remained in the family, he was surprised by its compactness and intuitiveness such as to give a hard time to the big sister. The sensor is a great strength even though outdated suffers from noise at ISO also intermediate. It's also very nice with the monitor can be tilted up to 180 °, fun. Very convenient zoom control on the shutter button is not present sull'A6000. On 16mpx optical not very high yield as the 16-50PZ or fixed pancakes 16:20 make unequivocally better. Too bad the lack of flash shoe and viewfinder even as accessories. Strategic battery which is the same as the other models E-mount, has been useful in some situations contingenti.rnrn sent on December 10, 2015 |
 | Sony E 10-18mm f/4 OSS Pros: Excellent build quality and optical performance, more than excellent particularly to 18mm and fairly even in the range of diaphragms Cons: Price, important perspective distortion towards the edges at 10mm but remains "planar" and the lines remain quite straight. Opinion: The possess almost a year of using it A6000 and also on NEX3n. Lens very funny in the street, both on "architectural" that kind of live handled. Lens ideal for shooting from center stage. Great for landscapes, pleasant "star" effect photographing backlit diaphragm inquadrato.rnAttenzione closed with the sun because it is a "handyman", is a specialized lens, push, that must be taken in combination with other less thrust of focus for use in round. In the street it should combine it with a 24 and a 50 not to miss niente.rn sent on December 10, 2015 |
 | Olympus 50mm f/1.8 OM F.Zuiko Pros: Very good yield, quality and fluidity of mechanisms, good yield on the macro Cons: It seems to return a slight dominant magenta, tonal passages not perfect Opinion: I confirm what has already been said, lens 80 of high quality and that "holds" in risolvenza on digital current. Very pleasant especially on the black and white, while the color, to be picky, suffers a bit 'in the shade and seems to have a slight dominant. Anyway fruibilissimo photo worthy of the best fixed optical digital. Very good for street and ritratti.rn sent on December 09, 2015 |
 | Sony E 55-210mm f/4.5-6.3 OSS Pros: Good quality lens made from medium-high. More than adequate handyman fruibilissimo at all focal lengths. Cons: Dim, making it the best especially with so much light, otherwise it "softens". Suboptimal in TA, but still usable. Opinion: In more than a year in the "world" and I must say it-mount lens that I used more and knowing I have learned to use it in its ideal conditions and obtained many high-quality images. But in fact you have to learn their limits. The stabilization works very well, very effectively. The rest I agree with those who commented before me. sent on December 09, 2015 |
 | Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Pros: Compactness, good yield up to 20mm focal length, good yield of extension tubes macro. Cons: Too dim to be a handyman, under 20mm expires for both distortion for clarity (on sensor 24mpx). Opinion: A lens that I took in the kit but I always used much. Recently often only when I need something very compact, out of sheer necessity. However, it is capable of churning out some good pictures from 20mm up and with good light, enough to use his limited range of diaphragms. It also becomes surprisingly good when mounted on extension tubes macro (with electrical contacts) up to magnifications greater than 1: 1. From provare.rnrn sent on December 09, 2015 |
 | Sony A6000 Pros: yield sensor, AF speed, compactness, versatility, coupled viewfinder - tilt monitor, aesthetic quality, quality, reliability. Well suited to the use of manual lenses, vintage, etc. Cons: Menus and functions excessive and wasteful, kit lenses lacking on telephoto (from 200 up above), on which we must seek in the manual lenses. Opinion: I have the A6000 October 2014, then to now more than a year and a month and over 5000 scatti.rnMi feel very comfortable, his real strength is the high quality of the sensor but to give the best dev 'it is combined with optical sibling. Among those I have certainly the Sony Zeiss 24 / 1.8 ZA, the Sony 10-18 / 4 oss, Sony 50 / 1.8 OSS. Zoom Sony 55-210 / 4.5-6.3 (taken in kit) makes up the sensor only in good light and preferably not at TA, while the 16-50PZ is usable on A6000 preferably not with very short focal. Generally on this sensor they tend to prefer fixed focal or zoom in top quality: the Sony stabilized 10-18 / 4, 18-105 / 4, the Zeiss 16-70 / 4. Cost, but on second is not difficult reperirli.rnUn great strength I find in the monitor tilt, useful and convenient, much more than other monitors booklet macchine.rnCompattezza: I have a kit with the A6000 "fixed" 4 AF optics that putin a handbag HAMA about 22x20x12, and advancing even a bit 'of space for 16-50PZ, wanting ... rnBatteria: it is true that it is small and has a capacity of about half compared to the SLR, but charges in approximately a 'Now virtually any USB hole with amperage decent, even during the lunch break or while downloading photos to PC (connecting the machine directly), and if you disable many unnecessary features (from "compact") that on a machine like this are also embarrassing, the battery life becomes more than sufficient to cover a long photographic output. I do not have a second battery, and do not feel the need, once I loaded the A6000 from 25% to 80% charge in the drive of about 40 minutes from the cigarette lighter and accessory telephone carica.rnAF: Fast, a sword, never had any type of problem in many different lighting conditions. In any case, the manual focus is fruibilissimo and easy soprattuttto activating the focus peaking with which a check is very well alsoshallow depth of field. I use it sometimes on optical AF.rnSono very pleased and I think I'll use it for years to come, then we will see what will bring out the mercato.rn sent on December 09, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
