|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Alessandro Maniccia www.juzaphoto.com/p/AlessandroManiccia  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC Aspherical Pros: angle of view, f 2.8, colors Cons: sharpness at room temperature, fixed lens hood, filter system Opinion: I took the yellow line version recently and luckily my copy has no problems of mismatch ring maf (easily fixed anyway). It was equipped with a filter system samyang. I have enjoyed in the past, the pros and cons of this lens. I use it mainly for night shots where you notice the shortcomings:-imprecise borders at least up to f 5.6-poor sharpness at room temperature the flaws a little thin if you use on apsc f 5.6 becomes instead a blade, ideal for landscapes in spite of the distortion in the but (correctable through the lens profiles) I still feel to recommend it for value for money sent on May 02, 2018 |
 | Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS II Pros: sharpness, escursionefocale, stabilizer Cons: maf slow, bayonet plastic, hood not available, sharpness than 200mm Opinion: was the second lens in my kit APSC and, after a slow change, the last lens APSC remained in my corredo.rnsin immediately amazed me for clarity even at room temperature, but sharpness is lost over the 200mm.rnla maf it is good with light and when using cross-type points, but goes to hell in the dark and if you do not use points of maf cross: the lens begins to focus when focus agganciare.rnpeccato without the lens hood is not supplied, but you know , canon them "offers" only to series L.rnrnper the rest this is a lens to buy absolutely, perhaps in STM version, because even if it is little used, leave you amazed at the quality of the file that regala.rn sent on March 01, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 II USM Pros: sharpness - bokeh - -usm speed - price used - focal opening - Compact Cons: barrel game Opinion: I was pleasantly surprised by this lente.rnL'ho bought looking for an inexpensive all-rounder (used on paid € 80) to be mounted on 5d old and immediately I was surprised by the sharpness already TA.rnL'ho chosen because, although it is not a series L, compared to the 24-105 f4 loses just a little 'aperture at maximum extension but maintains the constant f4 for much of the hike focale.rnA 105 maybe lose a sharpness hair and the fact that no iS is sometimes affects, especially when darkness falls luce.rnPer else I was really surprised, I did not expect that a lens from such a low price could behave so bene.rnPeccato only per barrel which, if inclined, does not maintain the position and it tends to withdraw or allungarsi.rnLo advice for those who, like me, does not want to sell a kidney for Photography. sent on February 20, 2017 |
 | Canon 5D Pros: FF, the price used, image quality, ergonomics, controls in the right place Cons: technical limitations due to age Opinion: I took a few days and the first impression is spectacular. gives a sense of strength when you have in hand is hard to find with other SLR entry level.rnsi located now at very affordable prices, and to enter the world of FF is a good passo.rnconfrontata with my 550D, does not bear comparison: the photos are more mellow, more consistent colors, reduced noise, and what little noise above 1200 iSO is almost pleasant and easily gestibile.rnil menu is simple but, given the age, unfortunately has the technical limits that will not make me leave the 550D, like the lack of Live View and the ability to do video.rnposso only advise those who want to look out into the world of FF without svenarsi.rnrnSe the look sure who made the call for the reinforcement of the mirror. rnrn sent on September 01, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
