|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Matty10 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Matty10  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 50mm f/1.2 L USM Pros: It is an extremely bright fixed optic that completes the pair with 24-70 Cons: Smashed edges if used for landscapes Opinion: The 50L is a unique lens, very special but not suitable for everyone. It is exceptional for those who understand it, allows you to have the focus of a 135mm with a 50mm so you can make beautiful portraits even indoors and with little space. Together with the 24-70 form the perfect couple for events and weddings, they have in common the color rendering and the progression of the blurred making omega the yield between the photos. The trio is completed with the 135L ensuring total coverage for any occasion sent on January 12, 2018 |
 | Canon EF 85mm f/1.4 L IS USM Pros: Very clear, not too heavy, has the stabilizer Cons: It is great, in my opinion not aesthetically beautiful as 85 the 1.2 or 24-70 first version Opinion: I had the opportunity to burst the optics and compare it with 1.2; From now on it is noticeable that it has fewer optical defects than the older brother who, however, remains more "creative". Some problems with the previous version with the rear bayonet wire glass and the speed of the autofocus have been resolved, which is now very good. The stabilizer does not find it helpful for portraits as for micro-motion on machines with many mpx. If I had to choose a 85 to bring me to a wedding or a dynamic situation I would choose this, they leave the 1.2 for posters and thoughts where there is the calm of composing the image. sent on November 05, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM Pros: Cost, weight, bokeh, af rapid Cons: Sharpness acceptable TA Opinion: very valid objective for what it costs. By spending more you can get much better as the big brother 1.2. It can also be used for sport as opposed to the 1.2. Compared al1,2 is more "all round". I use it primarily to TA or maximum 2.2 where it is not a blade, being a project dated from the best of some closed stop. sent on April 04, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM Pros: Sharpness, weighs, filters, cost and resale value Cons: f / 4 Opinion: Outstanding optics. I come from 10-22 on APSC and this is another thing ... Sharp from corner to corner since f4, and having such a wide angle allows it to be always used to TA without fire problems. The stabilizer is related focal on the genre, the minimum times are used without 1/15, 1/4 with. Further down you incur in the rough. If used for reportage and passeggistica is perfect sent on April 04, 2017 |
 | Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Pros: Cost and sharpness Cons: noisy stabilization Opinion: very good optical as the replacement of the Canon, good build quality. Now I use it for some months and I missed some shots due to AF a bit 'iffy but nothing to worry about. For photos cutlery nightclub or other premises it is excellent. very good VC, declared 4-stop, fully usable up to 3, then it depends on what you are stationary sent on January 08, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
