|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Yoctox www.juzaphoto.com/p/Yoctox  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pros: Photographic compartment in relation to the purchase price Cons: Proximity sensor and interference Opinion: I agree with the analysis of the previous comment. I add that you can observe disturbances, echoes and interference during phone calls if you are within a couple of meters from the PC. It would be advisable to deepen the level of electromagnetic emission from this device. For the rest, the construction seems acceptable in the value for money, as well as the enviable life of the battery that allows you to arrive at the end of the day with medium/intense use. In the meantime I posted a panoramic photo on the fly to appreciate the quality of the images. In low light condition the camera behaves pretty well. The default shade turns on cyan but is corregible in post-production. In conclusion The final judgement is certainly positive. sent on May 12, 2019 |
 | Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM Pros: Price, sharpness, stabilizer Cons: slightly dark, no hood, flare Opinion: Excellent lens in value for money, especially if we consider that has image stabilization. I was puzzled about purchasing because I feared that the edge sharpness decayed consistently, however even at 10 mm details on the sides of the frame are more than good. The distortion at the edges do not see it so exaggerated, probably because provendendo from Sigma 10-20 with equal focal latter distorted more, and can be solved in postproduction. And 'slightly dark, but we already know at the time of purchase. Almost mandatory use of the hood, as the flare are always around the corner. The lens handles well all openings. Highly recommended the purchase, especially when you have promotions that cut down considerably the guide price indicated here on Juza. sent on January 02, 2016 |
 | Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM Pros: Extraordinary sharpness at wide apertures, value / price excellent, light, vignetting, brightness acceptable Cons: AF noisy, no distance scale, no hood, narrower dynamic range, unfortunately only for APS-C but we know already from the time of purchase, so there would be a failure, effect "emasculation" of your camera considering that it is a Pancake , vignetting, MAF sometimes not very precise, the minimum distance of the MAF does not match that of 16 cm, but is intone to 21/22 cm. Opinion: Bought recently I must say that is one of the best buys. Stunning clarity under the f / 6, in particular conditions of light is practically a razor. Mounted on a camera Canon 1100D, it is giving me great satisfaction especially in the quality / price ratio. Highly recommended. It 'a hoot to focuse apertures. In some circumstances I must admit that tends to restore images with the light conditions do not correspond to the real both for luminous intensity, both for saturation, whereby, due to a reduced dynamic range, you notice high and low lights devoid of detail. Do not know if it depends, in this case, from my camera, but other targets mounted on the same machine body do not suffer from this effect. The hue towards cyan is slightly visible in some situations, but entirely negligible. Vignetting may be an advantage to those who like or a defect in some less. Obviously all fixable PP, as well as the curvature of the lens that can be seen when shooting the horizon. In some scenesAF not "pinch" properly, but nothing serious. The distortion, however, very light, is visible only on subjects close enough sprattutto when shooting vertically. The minimum distance of the MAF is a bit 'longer than indicated, but it is a negligible. It 'a shame that can not be mounted on FF. For "exhibitionists" is a lens to be discarded because they make a kind of reflex compattona, iperchè seems that no lens is mounted on the camera, then "manfully" weakened. In conclusion I think it is a good buy. sent on December 18, 2015 |
 | Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM Pros: Price, weight, color, clarity (only middle), distortion, reduced flare Cons: brightness, unusable below f / 8, details rough at the edges, Opinion: Purchased for needs "wide-angle" I have found since the first shots some unique aspects. For those without much expectation he proves without doubt a sufficient compromise in the quality / price, but all the positives are concentrated in those listed above in the "pro". When night falls the low light it makes all feel. Highly recommended tripod for those without a very firm hand. A TA is embarrassing as may be blurred at the edges with vignetting visible in particular conditions of light. As it is said to depend on the "games", it is very likely that I have come across that does not particularly performance. sent on July 03, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
