|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Irenix www.juzaphoto.com/p/Irenix  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM Pros: Lightweight, small, good construction takes up little space. Convenient for "light" rides. The pros end here. Cons: Impressive distortion, as if it were a fisheye. If you open the raw "naked and raw" you are speechless, never seen such a distortion, you have to work on it to remedy it with obvious "cutouts". If it is used for photos of monuments, squares, views in cities or villages, be prepared for accommodations in not indifferent posts. I repeat, I'm talking about the raw output without automatic profile corrections. I knew it wasn't a top lens, but honestly it disappointed me a bit. It's true that I didn't expect the performance of an L series, it's true that it's a wide-angle F 2.8 that costs very little (bought Amazon offer), it's true that I'm used to the impressive performance of the Canon EF 16-35 F/4, I didn't expect that performance, but not even these results where in the end the solution is to resort to corrections via post/SW. The fact is that you frame, compose from the viewfinder of the R6mkII you see everything ok, you shoot, you download the raw file on the PC you open it and say "but I had taken this photo"? Opinion: Convenient for light rides. Get ready to fix heavy sprains. Overall, I don't feel like giving him more than a 7. I repeat, convenient for "no commitment" outings. Let's see if with more intense use I can find the right balance and feeling. I'll try to put it on the rope and try to figure out how to make the most of it, since I bought it mainly for light Sunday outings in villages/cities/churches and monuments. sent on August 10, 2024 |
 | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM II Pros: Versatility, build quality, stabilizer,boken Cons: A little soft TA, chromatic aberrations, 24mm distortions Opinion: A versatile lens with the classic range of focals that on FF allows you to cover many needs. Excellent build quality and excellent stabilizer. I have never tried the previous version so I can not say what the improvements are. Soft to TA, it suffers from chromatic aberrations and 24mm distortions. It's definitely the classic "all-rounder" lens that allows you to go out with a "minimal" body-goal set, which I needed for the "daily" and "holiday" outings. Obviously my assessment of quality is very influenced by the fact that I do the comparison with the surrender of the 16-35 f/4 IS, a monster of sharpness from board to board also to TA and poor distortion. sent on August 04, 2019 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
