JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM : Specifications and Opinions

The Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM is a wide-angle lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2021. The focus is done by Stepper Motor, it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 282 €;

56 users have given it an average vote of 8.9 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Canon RF: this lens is compatible with mirrorless fullframe and APS-C Canon RF.

Specifications
Focal lenght	16 mm
Angle of view	106.9°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/2.8
Aperture blades	7
Lenses/Groups	9 elements in 7 groups
Min. focus distance	0.13 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.26x
Features
Stabilization	No
Focus	Stepper Motor
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	No
Extenders	No
Filters	43 mm
Lens hood	Yes (not supplied)
Weather sealing	No
Weight	165 g
Dimensions	69 x 40 mm
Buy
Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Ecka

sent on November 07, 2022

Pros: Small, light, quite affordable, decent bokeh quality for an ultra wide lens, good reproduction ratio, nice and sharp in the middle and most of the frame, works well against bright light and Sun

Cons: Soft edges, ridiculously small filter size, lens hood sold separately

Opinion: Well, for the price, this lens is a must-have. And it's rather unique, RF system only. I really enjoyed using it for close-ups, walkaround, landscapes, food, pets, cars, even portraits. It seems to be wider than 16mm when shot in RAW without lens corrections ON and the edge details look better when not stretched out by the lens geometry correction. Therefore it is better to keep the corrections OFF in many situations. Highly recommended!

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Ivan666

sent on July 06, 2025

Pros: Lightweight and cheap, fast af.

Cons: Very pronounced distortion, very low image quality at the edges

Opinion: Bought to experiment with the focal length, I can compare it to the first ef 16 35 2.8 and I can say that qualitatively it is very far from it. In post production the distortion is well fixed but perhaps further cropping is needed to obtain a realistic image. The sharpness in the center of the image is good but pushing towards the edges is gradually pulped. Goal sold.

Mikidel

sent on October 13, 2024

Pros: Lightweight, good sharpness in the center from 2.8, nice colors, well made, cheap for the focal length and quiet.

Cons: Lens hood to be purchased separately.

Opinion: Quite skeptical at the time of purchase, mounted on R6, it has the same dimensions as the RF 50mm f/1.8 stm, so it creates a particularly compact whole. After taking a few test shots already on the screen of the car they didn't look bad at all, then downloaded the shots on the PC, on the monitor my skepticism was dispelled. For what it offers and for the price paid, the results are more than noteworthy. Some may say that it is the result of the on-camera correction of distortions and aberrations, but given the results and how they are achieved I have nothing to object, also because I hardly shoot in raw with ML. Purchased for light outings, it does not make me regret having left the ef/rf adapter and the Canon EF 16-35 F/4 L IS at home, certainly more performing and versatile but much heavier and bulkier. I vote a nice full 9 deserves it all.

Frengod

sent on August 20, 2024

Pros: Price, weight, size

Cons: The edges of the photos are a bit stretched both for the focal length and for the sw correction

Opinion: Or you enter the optics that a 16mm, RF mount, used under 300 euros, 180g, as big as the 50mm must be corrected via sw or better leave it alone. One buys a chihuahua and then demands that it bark like a Great Dane. It's a chihuahua, it fits in the handbag and barks like a chihuahua. We have had n discussions on this perspective. Some have shown that most of the distortion is related to the focal length and not to the sw correction. It is the ideal companion for outings, at home it returns (if left with its distortion) funny photos. Very sharp in the center even at TA. Ideal companion of the 24-105 (poor and not) and the fifty, it worthily completes the kit. For the rest, go here: https://www.juzaphoto.com/topic2.php?l=it&t=4270580

Irenix

sent on August 10, 2024

Pros: Lightweight, small, good construction takes up little space. Convenient for "light" rides. The pros end here.

Cons: Impressive distortion, as if it were a fisheye. If you open the raw "naked and raw" you are speechless, never seen such a distortion, you have to work on it to remedy it with obvious "cutouts". If it is used for photos of monuments, squares, views in cities or villages, be prepared for accommodations in not indifferent posts. I repeat, I'm talking about the raw output without automatic profile corrections. I knew it wasn't a top lens, but honestly it disappointed me a bit. It's true that I didn't expect the performance of an L series, it's true that it's a wide-angle F 2.8 that costs very little (bought Amazon offer), it's true that I'm used to the impressive performance of the Canon EF 16-35 F/4, I didn't expect that performance, but not even these results where in the end the solution is to resort to corrections via post/SW. The fact is that you frame, compose from the viewfinder of the R6mkII you see everything ok, you shoot, you download the raw file on the PC you open it and say "but I had taken this photo"?

Opinion: Convenient for light rides. Get ready to fix heavy sprains. Overall, I don't feel like giving him more than a 7. I repeat, convenient for "no commitment" outings. Let's see if with more intense use I can find the right balance and feeling. I'll try to put it on the rope and try to figure out how to make the most of it, since I bought it mainly for light Sunday outings in villages/cities/churches and monuments.

There are 17 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM

Plans

by Danysky
38 comments, 6223 views [editors pick]

HI RES 4.9 MP

Curly pelicans

by Alomar
46 comments, 4481 views [editors pick]

HI RES 3.8 MP

Starry night on the Rosengarten

by 75Daniele
189 comments, 3096 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Venetian ambulance

by Giallo63
48 comments, 4283 views

HI RES 3.5 MP

Sparrow from a different perspective

by Taurex
19 comments, 2104 views

The Three Peaks

by 75Daniele
70 comments, 2790 views

Path of Dreams, Vuglio Waterfall

by Savastano
52 comments, 2474 views

HI RES 17.2 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Bow at dawn

by Peppe Cancellieri
35 comments, 877 views

HI RES 12.1 MP

Christmas lights

by Roy72chi
66 comments, 1620 views

HI RES 13.5 MP

Bus 60

by Peppe Cancellieri
49 comments, 1400 views

HI RES 7.3 MP

Atriums

by Peppe Cancellieri
31 comments, 364 views

HI RES 15.0 MP

Rome 2025

by Peppe Cancellieri
31 comments, 467 views

HI RES 17.4 MP

The Mighty Beech of the Mountain of Flowers

by IlAndrea13
50 comments, 1377 views

Alba Adriatica

by Peppe Cancellieri
37 comments, 341 views

HI RES 12.7 MP

Arch Magnus

by Peppe Cancellieri
44 comments, 1861 views

HI RES 8.9 MP

Cathedral of the Most Holy Savior

by Peppe Cancellieri
49 comments, 2126 views

HI RES 13.9 MP

Street Jazz Band

by Peppe Cancellieri
25 comments, 2969 views

HI RES 13.8 MP

Autumn in Vernazza

by Savastano
30 comments, 2288 views

HI RES 11.8 MP

January 1, 2024

by Peppe Cancellieri
56 comments, 2045 views

HI RES 13.3 MP

Concerto for accordion and double bass

by Peppe Cancellieri
39 comments, 2015 views

HI RES 18.0 MP

Light Painting

by Savastano
24 comments, 1820 views

Martini glass

by Savastano
33 comments, 640 views

Opera Cloakroom

by Peppe Cancellieri
22 comments, 578 views

HI RES 16.5 MP

Box 69

by Peppe Cancellieri
15 comments, 517 views

HI RES 20.0 MP

Under the station

by Peppe Cancellieri
30 comments, 888 views

HI RES 20.0 MP

The boys, the evening, the sea....

by Peppe Cancellieri
24 comments, 284 views

HI RES 16.7 MP

Piani Lakes

by Luca Andreina
14 comments, 1158 views

Venice

by Giallo63
21 comments, 1521 views

HI RES 3.7 MP

.... a thousand years ago....

by Peppe Cancellieri
24 comments, 329 views

HI RES 20.0 MP

Reyniskirkja Church

by MaxShutterSpeed
5 comments, 2397 views

HI RES 20.0 MP

U.F.O.

by VittorioDs
11 comments, 2951 views

HI RES 30.1 MP

Sanctuary of Santa Maria del Monte in Varese

by Massimo Schiavi
40 comments, 1210 views

HI RES 20.2 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Chapel of the Shroud

by Giovamonti
5 comments, 1120 views

HI RES 19.0 MP

Pontone beech - Villetta Barrea

by IlAndrea13
13 comments, 1020 views

DREAMS

by Claudio Mantova
28 comments, 429 views

All fruits

by Peppe Cancellieri
33 comments, 1258 views

HI RES 12.2 MP

Orcia Valley

by Savastano
22 comments, 1350 views

HI RES 7.8 MP

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Canon » Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM

Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM