|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Textars www.juzaphoto.com/p/Textars  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Yongnuo YN600EX-RT Pros: complete, a faithful copy of the Canon Cons: Goes when and how he wants Opinion: After 2 years I can say that Yongnuo's weak point is reliability. It worked smoothly for 6 months, now when I turn it on it remains 15 minutes with half screen lcd without information, then "magically recover - and when it goes well - but it is not constant. I should send it for assistance but then I think "who makes me do it?..... Bought for 150 euros does not deserve them. Flunked. sent on July 08, 2019 |
 | Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 XR Di LD Pros: Price. Focal length 2.8 Cons: Chromatic aberrations. Inadequate yield of light Opinion: Purchased to replace the 24 70 Sigma 2.8 macro for the use I made it turned out to be totally unable to handle the comparison with a retired "colleague" .... supereconomic and honest optics, shows the rope in low light at Point to make the files produced less usable. On canon 6D over the ISO 1600 is a bit of a disaster unless you use ub flash or replay on any type of illumination. AF quite accurate but as soon as the dusk does not work hard on 6D ... In short ... a bright optic but absolutely distant from Canon and Sigma ... starting to shoot in perfect light conditions, as subject to Flare. That said 270 euro is worth it all and more ... but it is not a Canon 24 70 2.8 and, unfortunately, not even the Sigma 24 70 2.8. You must be honest. If, for a cameraman who portrays her children etc .. is the right optic probably ... but do not ask for more. sent on August 12, 2017 |
 | Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro Pros: Clarity and definition to high openings must be content to 2.8 (but it is a bell'accontentarsi). Not even looks good in comparison with optical Canon L series resistance Flare. Cons: AF a little slow if subject movement, as a handyman does not excel in everything Opinion: Purchased used to race when I noticed that I could not use the Sigma 18/200 3.5 / 5.6 per220 € I think that I could not wait any longer '... Optics solid, bright and well suited to landscapes, portraits with a discreet zoom range. is the classic lens which is held ever mounted for travel and any evenienza.rnNon could expect more 'for what I pagato.rn sent on January 27, 2017 |
 | Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Pros: definition, focus, clarity, precision, stability, color neutrality Cons: weight, size, inability to use the bezel of the mesa in focus when the lens hood is in the rest position is absolutely not a complete failure but it is a good "cannon" Opinion: used several times the poses made with this perspective stand out over any other approach used, both for chromatic range which by definition and sharpness. I used it almost as a macro to the first detailed plans to 2.8, and the result was simply unexpected. The three-dimensional effect is absolutely excellent. great views, great portraits .... A friend of mine gave it to me already asked for the Carnival of Venice where there are really a lot of details to be seized. Absolutely excellent for the price. It immediately equipped with an anti UV filter Hoya Pro ... Even me become more 'pleasant risultato.rn sent on January 27, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
