JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro : Specifications and Opinions

Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro

The Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro is a standard lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2004 to 2013 (discontinued). The focus is done by Lens AF motor (non-ultrasonic), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 520 €;

51 users have given it an average vote of 8.2 out of 10.

Specifications
Focal lenght	24-70 mm
Angle of view	84.1 - 34.4°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/2.8
Aperture blades	9
Lenses/Groups	14 elements in 13 groups
Min. focus distance	0.40 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.26x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, external
Stabilization	No
Focus	Lens AF motor (non-ultrasonic)
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	No
Extenders	No
Filters	82 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	No
Weight	715 g
Dimensions	89 x 116 mm
Buy
Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Artman17

sent on June 23, 2013

Pros: Brightness , color balance , Bokeh

Cons: Heavy with no OS, not real macro like Sigma 17-70mm f 2.8-4, bit soft at 2.8,

Opinion: This one was the first constant aperture lens I have purchased. I have sticked with Sigma ever since and I am satisfied. At start this lens seemed to me a bit soft at 2.8 and perhaps it is ( don't have it any more to compare with more lenses) It was my main lens for about a year till it fell down while on camera and broke Though for sure it was softer at 2.8 than my Nikkor 1.4G. When stopped down produced excellent image quality with great color discrimination with minimal aberrations. Best shot from f4.5-9. It was heavy though and at low light conditions that did not help to have a steady shot. I would recommend the lighter Sigma 24-70mm and if you need good macro the new ( 2013) contemporary series Sigma 17-70mm. Heaviness was also a factor that this lens broke as it didn't sit quite balanced when resting the camera and at a small fall 50mm height) totally broke from base. ( my mistake but tooo heavy). Still have it in storage and thinking of repairing it

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Master Inventor

sent on December 17, 2022

Pros: Robust, all-rounder, bright, economical compared to the original Canon. Nothing to say about the optical side.

Cons: The af mechanic was a disappointing and frustrating experience.

Opinion: An all-rounder zoom for FF can be the 24-70 if f.2.8 is even better. I use handymen, from tourism, to play and work. Reasonable price when compared to the original Canon. At the time, the lack of the ultrasonic engine was also accepted. Excellent optical quality, we are talking about a new zoom cost € 600. Robust because I've been using it for 20 years or so. Zoom ring not very fluid but all in all acceptable. Used on film and digital. In short, it paid off. However, the focus ring that in addition to rotating slides back and forth that does not. Who... or did he think so? You are focusing and it runs between your fingers, you move it forward so that it does not bother and tac has come back. I would have been willing to buy the next version, which also had the ultrasonic focus motor, but Sigma reversed the direction of the focus ring... On the contrary to all the other Sigma lenses I had. In short, in order not to have a whitefly in af mode I use scotch tape. After this experience I abandoned my claims on Sigma.

Claudio Ricci

sent on December 27, 2018

Pros: Rugged, well built, versatile, sharp, even very much between F4 and F10, bright, good bokeh, decent performance "macro" shooting from 40-50 cm away

Cons: Marked softness to f2.8, no stabilization, AF a bit slow (not a big deal, anyway)

Opinion: Had for a couple of years (bought used and at last resold), I often paired it to my quasi-ubiquitous 28-300 VR, which is much more versatile but I starts from 28 when, in certain situations, I crave that greater wide that you can not always simulate "taking a few steps Back "(Interestingly, however, I am satisfied with the 28-300 on DX, which starts from well 42 mm equivalent). Sharp (and also very much between F4 and F10), bright, effective, there were only merits until some photos, taken towards 70 mm with little light, was not implacably plagued by the blur if you do not remember to shoot at least 1/100 and then with the need for high ISO , and fortunately that the D700 that I had at the time held them very well (the absence of stabilizer, to which the 28-300 you get used to it too much, it was felt!). The real troubles were beginning in the evening, or indoors without flash, when f2.8 revealed a marked softness, a noticeable collapse compared to the rest of the openings. Woe to take pictures freehand at 70 mm to f2.8 at 1/60 or around them, 50 shots and over on 100, between shake and softness, were to be trashing rabidly. The (very) soft focus at 2.8 was much less a problem in portraiture, but I do a portrait on average every 1000 photos... The autofocus is relatively slow, but it was not a problem for my type of shots, and anyway it seemed to me always quite accurate, most importantly. Rating: Altogether 8.

Paolo Loro

sent on June 06, 2018

Pros: Weight, ruggedness, sharpness, bokeh, colour rendition, excellent value for money

Cons: Little Fluid Zoom Ring

Opinion: Quote as written by Prodeettorre: «As a whole it defends itself very well, faithfully returning colors and sharpness. Let's not forget the quality/price ratio and nevertheless the quality/weight ratio. ' The chromatic rendering in my opinion is placed on a level of authentic excellence: neutral, without dominance. The contrast is balanced and the shadows are readable. The bokeh is pleasant, although in certain situations (diaphragming and with points of light) can be a little "nervous": Overall the image returned by this sigma is realistic, ie arouses the memory of the scene as well as it is exactly lived, and this is in Ultimately the prerogative of the best objectives. At 70 2.8 The lens is particularly suitable for portraits: at the same aperture it does not disfigure at all with my 85 Nikkor lenses. For those who love portraits is undoubtedly a perspective that gives satisfaction, but is defended with decorum in every circumstance, even indoor. In the landscapes, by diaphragm, remarkable results can be obtained, as in the rest testify the images present at the bottom of the page, sometimes indistinguishable from those obtained from far more noble optics. The AF is not a thunderbolt but the practical act has never bothered me. Sturdy object without being heavy: 700 grams for a full frame zoom with fixed aperture at 2.8 There are not many, also considering the weight of the individual fixed optics that it replaces (24, 28, 35, 50, 70). It is the classic honest and no frills lens that makes bringing home the result (a good result) in every situation. Over time I switched to using mostly fixed optics, but when I need flexibility combined with brightness I still use this Sigma with pleasure, and I never felt the need to change it to chase fads. I look good from selling it, because it is worth far more than the handful of euros that ricaverei. In Conclusion: The Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro, while being dated and lacking features that today seem indispensable (stabilization, tropicalization, etc.), achieves in my opinion a good balance between practicality of use, cost and optical quality, and It is a good choice for those who look after the substance.

Prodeettorre

sent on January 28, 2017

Pros: Price and weight.

Cons: Maybe a little soft at all opening.

Opinion: I used this lens on a Nikon D750 and I can only give it a more positive opinion. To look for the hair in the egg I might say that it seemed to me a little soft at all opening, but overall it defends very well, faithfully returning colors and sharpness. Do not forget the value for money and nevertheless the quality / weight ratio. Even close-range photography may also be considered acceptable, although this is certainly not the predominant use to which the target is targeted, even if labeled Macro.

There are 11 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro

Spot on Castelluccio

by Ricciulino
87 comments, 8315 views

HI RES 5.8 MP

Waves of Petra

by Max57
99 comments, 9192 views [editors pick]

Quiet or storm?

by Valentina D'Arienzo
151 comments, 5444 views

HI RES 9.9 MP

Marsala, salt marshes

by Max57
63 comments, 11817 views

-Threvor-4

by Ol Muntagner
49 comments, 6521 views

Fishing at dawn

by Max57
63 comments, 9071 views

Dariya

by Ianni70
11 comments, 4992 views

Morning mist

by Max57
55 comments, 10492 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Pennywise

by Valentina D'Arienzo
100 comments, 2991 views

HI RES 9.9 MP

Shades

by Max57
44 comments, 7103 views

Den for you!

by Claudio Ricci
98 comments, 1087 views

HI RES 34.5 MP

Dayboro Rodeo 2

by Teper
30 comments, 3588 views

On the way to the indefinite .... ...

by RiccardoE
55 comments, 6941 views

Cold Avenue

by Alberto Dall'oglio
16 comments, 2939 views

Night shift

by Paolo Calò
34 comments, 1069 views

HI RES 4.3 MP

Storm

by Momophoto
21 comments, 2297 views

HI RES 14.3 MP

Untitled Photo

by Valentina D'Arienzo
62 comments, 3042 views

HI RES 7.9 MP

Hook

by Valentina D'Arienzo
78 comments, 3582 views

HI RES 10.1 MP

Non-Place

by Claudio Ricci
67 comments, 1506 views

HI RES 11.6 MP

Patruni and sutta

by Valentina D'Arienzo
74 comments, 2662 views

HI RES 10.1 MP

Romeo

by Valentina D'Arienzo
76 comments, 2674 views

HI RES 7.8 MP

Alessia ...

by Momophoto
11 comments, 6654 views

HI RES 16.5 MP

Dayboro Rodeo

by Teper
15 comments, 3227 views

Passion

by Valentina D'Arienzo
50 comments, 1958 views

HI RES 9.5 MP

Gesture of love

by Valentina D'Arienzo
82 comments, 3433 views

HI RES 6.6 MP

Urban colors

by Valentina D'Arienzo
78 comments, 2437 views

HI RES 8.8 MP

The bridge between the bridges

by Valentina D'Arienzo
87 comments, 2390 views

HI RES 9.8 MP

I'll wait .... back soon ...

by Momophoto
9 comments, 3843 views

HI RES 17.2 MP

Ire towards Locatelli

by Emanuele Quaglia
7 comments, 3005 views

HI RES 8.0 MP

6x6 what a passion...

by Fabrizio Ferroni
11 comments, 1804 views

The mad hatter 2

by Valentina D'Arienzo
89 comments, 2942 views

HI RES 9.4 MP

In the mouth of the fox

by Valentina D'Arienzo
78 comments, 2236 views

HI RES 8.7 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

I watch you

by Valentina D'Arienzo
65 comments, 2302 views

Untitled Photo

by Max57
54 comments, 3511 views

I remain petrified

by Pix And Love
4 comments, 3528 views

Terry

by Momophoto
7 comments, 7620 views

HI RES 6.3 MP

Hands up!

by Ianni70
13 comments, 3153 views

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Sigma » Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro

Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro