|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Mmarzaro www.juzaphoto.com/p/Mmarzaro  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Fujifilm X-T2 Pros: Image quality, ease of use, optics, weight. Cons: consumption Opinion: I have a Fuji (X Pro2 and some optics) system to which I have recently added the XT2. I'm not a pixel hunter for which I do not fully agree with some opinions expressed previously, and doing especially street I find that the whole system is enviable for portability and quality, in particular the XT2 is manually unimpeachable and with a AF definitely good. I agree that probably a FF SLR has everything you want, but having made a choice in carrying less weight possible (and ride anyway with 2 camera bodies and some optics!) I know I have given up some possibilities. At night I use ISO 3200 and I can agree that other machines do better, but I do 60x40 prints on valuable paper for exhibitions with flawless results. Before changing the system I will think, also because, wanting to look for other possibilities, with lenses Leica, Voigtlander or my old Zeiss CY is doing very well. sent on June 07, 2019 |
 | Fujifilm X-T20 Pros: Small, high sensor quality Cons: I do not know Opinion: Second body after x pro 2, allows me to expand the possibilities by covering lots of shots that I would lose in the change of optics. It's really, and strangely, small, so much to change feelings from one body to the other, here is perhaps the big difference with the older sxt 2 who is even more gifted. With a pancake-like goal becomes pocket-sized, it's extremely fast, for those who do not want to think it has a lever on the cap, coaxial to the main ring, which makes it an independent "automata" and therefore can be considered an excellent compact, certainly comparable ( and probably with something more) to the x100 sisters. Thanks to the retractable back screen allows a somewhat smarter use and some shots in different positions, the viewfinder is comparable to that of xpro 2 and I find no difference. With a triad of fuji targets from wide-angle to medium-sized canvases I can cover almost everything I like in the street and in the b & w.Lastly, considering that it costs about half (!) Of the older sister, in my opinion it is a great purchase and allows to expand the use of optics, even vintage, very easily. I do not use videos so I can not give judgments in qs sector. In my opinion, it is advisable. sent on October 01, 2017 |
 | Fujifilm XF 23mm f/1.4 R Pros: Sharpness, blurry, available range, brightness Cons: The hood ... Opinion: I agree with the views expressed previously by those who have it. Indeed, a very good lens I always use in combination with xpro 2 (I do not disconnect it ever), I forgive a lot compared to 35 mm, which I also find excellent for sharpness and focal, with regard to the field angle giving exactly l 'idea what the street is. I also have the 14th, great, but the 23 is incredibly "natural" as far as it can frame the scene and return it to the pictures. In the b & w, which is my main use, it is exceptional for poor distortion and ensures excellent shadow and high light recovery, along with the current 24-volt sensor. Strictly speaking, the quality is paid and the price I find appropriate even if I did not try the younger brother f2 who say it is faster in the maf, actually in the sometimes somewhat laborious 23, probably also due to some imperfection on my part in choosing of the autofocus menus. In my opinion the drama of the hood is that it is%3B plastic, the shape could also be tolerated, it always seems to have to break it. sent on September 24, 2017 |
 | Fujifilm XF 35mm f/1.4 R Pros: Size, clarity, directness in the use of the character of focal Cons: Literally infamous hood, focus sometimes laborious Opinion: It 'a kind of fantastic little canvases to portraits, street, reportage, with a minimum diaphragm that ensures excellent sharpness and blur, extremely versatile for both images in full light with minimal lighting. The dimensions are the ideal complement to the fuji, and manual is fantastic because, like all the objectives of this brand, is working like the old analog thanks to the aperture ring which is to place it deserves. Not the detachment almost never from the camera body because the vision and the details that returns must be referred to, in particular, can play forever on close-ups / blurred relationship with splendid results, perhaps it should only be compared with the 23 mm (equivalent to 35 I never had) for the street. painful notes: the hood, I'm speechless as for other fuji and replaced with an equivalent in readily available metal, and making sometimes laborious fire with uncertainty I can not define precisely but with the transition to x pro 2 are much reduced. coNCLUSION: very good. sent on July 04, 2016 |
 | Fujifilm X-Pro2 Pros: Maneuverability, file quality, viewfinder Cons: Price (?) Opinion: Coming from the xt1, already great car, I was amazed at the ease of use and quality of the pictures. I did not test if I did not summarize the files "prepared" by the machine because I just clicked in raw and then processed the file (50 mb!) To almost invariably get a B & W, but jpegs do not joke anyway because they are rich in detail. It is a true extension of the photographer's hands, even for the Leica-style viewfinder, which favors a wider vision, as well as providing some extra possibilities in choosing the image when used in optical form. The sensor forgives a bit more than the previous version, which is of help in the evening and in the street version, and from the satisfaction even with non-original optics (I sometimes use Zeiss lenses of the Contax reflex series with more "round" results than not with Fuji). Being an "analogue" photographer until a few years ago (in fact, con reflex Contax) just recently converted to digital with Fuji, I can not express comparisons with the celebrated Japanese brands with regard to focus and shooting speed. I can still guarantee that to do B & W, street, portrait, a lot of other things but, I imagine, not sport, is a phenomenal machine. Rnrn .... After a run-in period of 23 f 1.4 (exceptional) I add that this seems to me the ideal combination for machine and optics. The street view is exceptional, and the fact that you can "dominate" the scene even by looking at the "outside" of the car with the side viewer makes it literally a glove in the photographer's hand. I almost no longer split machine and lens, and I understand authorship report authors summarizing their equipment in "a car and optics" as much as to turn between people and capture the faces that make reportage unique. sent on July 01, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
