|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Davide Deriu Photography www.juzaphoto.com/p/DavideDeriuPhotography  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: quality / price ratio, tropicalization, hike, sharpness, contrast Cons: if I have to find one: f / 4 Opinion: This lens is one of the major successes of the Canon, sold separately or as a kit especially for the FF, is really a handyman optics. In my case having an APS-C (7D mk2) I find that the mere fact of exploiting the central part makes it to the final where the optical journey really be the best, mainly because of the sharpness. Fantastic for street and for landscaping. Maybe there are those who objected to the fact of using it on an APSC reduces the field, but according to me it seems to have certain kinds priceless and irreplaceable (if you want a wide angle APSC than enough for a 10-18 .stm). Beautiful, strong and not afraid Tropicalized rain or moisture. Robust Also the lens hood. Along with a weather sealed body makes the winning combination for every adverse situation. sent on April 18, 2016 |
 | Canon 7D Mark II Pros: Af amazing, gust, high ISO seal, dual slot, joystick, tropicalization Cons: they have to find one: lack wi-fi (could definitely put it) Opinion: I went from a 60D to 7DMk2 as a matter of management of AF points and its gust speed. I found myself with a body really solid car and well waterproofed. The estate of the iso for me is good until 3200, pleasant until 6400 and still usable up to 16000. say exploitable because the grain is not at all annoying, even in black and white is really nice and you do not want to take it off, but to leave it for creative effects. On this point, I really like to focus because of all the other features you already said everything and more. To me it is very reminiscent of the film grain and noise are not the famous gangs that plague other APSC. This is very important and the idea than we have been working on this sensor, which certainly has its say, even compared to the FF who kept best at high sensitivity levels. The machine is obviously exceptional for sports and bird life, but I find it valid for my favorite genres such asthe street and the views. From the best with standard optical L, no doubt. Its speed allows for HDR Room razor sharp, that reduce not just the work of this kind. Shadows are recoverable in a way you do not expect (I personally tried to limit situations of the burn to black to test it). Missing only the wi-fi, but it can be addressed by a board EyeFi (Canon could also put it though ...) also Consigliatissima alongside a full frame sent on April 02, 2016 |
 | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Pros: Quality lenses, sharpness, stabilizer and price Cons: Building exterior plastic although well done, lack chance to put tripod ring. Opinion: My experience with this is about a month, I took it instead of the usual 70-200 f4 L series of Canon for my EOS 60D, rnper via the price of many reviews positive.rnDa my part, I have really surprised at the quality of the images is really very good and stabilizer really efficientern (allows you to shoot handheld avoiding blur even with less light) .rnLo blurry I like very much, as well as the bokeh.rnConsigliatissimo especially on APS-C where according to me the best, given the sharpness especially in the middle and then because of the crop factor, rnpraticamente throughout the image already TA.rnLenti of great quality and value for money then a really high. sent on April 21, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
