|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
DaniloCosta www.juzaphoto.com/p/DaniloCosta  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport Pros: Construction, sharpness, stabilizer Cons: Weight, non-removable collar Opinion: I was torn between the Nikon and this Sigma but reading around the synthesis was "a hair better the Nikon". Weight aside (in Nikon's favor), that hair was worth about 1000 dollars and in my opinion it wasn't worth it. Used on the D810 and D750 did not require adjustments, AF fast, effective stabilizer, sharp already at f/2.8 but if you close to f/3.2 it is spectacular with a great bokeh. Its optimal terrain is f/3.2 with focal from 100mm up to just under 200mm, personally I use it for portraiture and dog photography and even during fast actions does not disappoint at all. sent on February 11, 2020 |
 | Fujifilm S5 Pro Pros: CCD sensor, spectacular complexion, very natural colors, delicate tonal passages, excellent dynamic range Cons: High ISO, menu can be improved, display. Opinion: Bought, sold and then repurchased again. Those who try this sensor are unlikely to give up because the performance in portraits is something different from modern CMOS but also from past CCDs. Although I have the habit of shooting in raw, the S5 churn out the already ready and very workable JPEG, visually better than the raw with a "flat" setting. There is a program that manages the S and R pixels separately for an even more accurate file management making editing even more enjoyable. In the flaws I can not list the slowness of operations in all its forms, because those who buy a reflex like that does not do it to photograph sport, its field is the portraiture and it is there that makes the difference. For me a full 9 sent on September 10, 2018 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
