|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Fratomic www.juzaphoto.com/p/Fratomic  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 XR Di LD Pros: image quality, fully usable shots already in TA, light weight, the used price. Cons: Autofocus slow, too slow, building a more plasticky. Opinion: I bought a couple of months ago and I use Nikon D800.rnNon I complain because cheap and the yield is much, il.problema is that the autofocus is slow, uncertain in low light conditions, it is practically the only ha.rnAddirittura achilles heel that is slower than the Sigma 28-70 2.8 ex dg although la.qualitá is waaay more than sigma.rnSe you use it to book and click premarital at home or outdoors (picture then built) is fine. rnLo not recommend it for baptisms / weddings where the readiness of an autofocus to catch the moment (especially in the church) is of obbligornrn sent on February 25, 2017 |
 | Pentax K-30 Pros: Tropicalizazzione, grip, weight, internal stabilizer which stabilizes a bottle screwed to the body, just megapixels, jpeg baked good, .iso, shutter speed, video quality, beautiful esteticamente.rn Cons: Sound obvious (for those who are accustomed to a perfectionist and body FX) already at 800 iso, optical costicchiano, DNG files to be converted with special software (which is cumbersome and boring), no USB, to put photos on the PC must extract SD and put it into an adapter, too many settings, controls put really bad, poor battery life. Opinion: The advice to those who want to make the settings figo.rnHa many, many ways of programming and personalization, which can be both an advantage for those who love to fiddle around instead of photographing, that a failure for those who want to photograph seriamente.rnLa sceda technique of this camera is great for its location, but then ... that makes this noise iso piangere..rnPenso that as camera is suitable for those who want a handyman cool, absolutely not a professional photographer (I come from unsurpassed Nikon D700) .rnSe tomorrow Pentax will release a full-frame, so I hope to have the foresight to position well the controls and remove all these settings that are losing tempo.rn sent on June 13, 2015 |
 | Soligor 135mm f/2.8 Pros: Brightness, sharpness and bokeh, price. Cons: Being a vintage optic, does not have the treatments of the optics of today, is MF, no stabilizer and so on, in short, jerky turns out very beautiful but with vintage touch Opinion: I own a 135 mm f2.8 with Helicar attack Minolta MD (produced by Tokina, (which produced Vivitar, Soligor, Helicar, Tokinon, Rokinon and all Japanese years 80/90)), paid 15 euro, as a new Roma.rnUn optical fun, especially for macro if associated with a 2x teleconverter or extension tubes, or for ritratto.rnIl bokeh is very nice, although mine has 6 blades. Those with 12/15/16 blades churn bokeh softer, but nothing because, too, doing her. sent on March 23, 2015 |
 | Nikon D700 Pros: Management at high ISO (ISO 1000 still produces beautiful shots), ergonimia, construction and unequaled strength, sensor 12 mpx fantastic, AF grandioso.rnIl shutter noise is fascinating. Cons: A single CF slot, no video (which after all can be an advantage) and nothing SD, weighs a bit too much if combined with a SIGMA AF 14mm (80 '), then if we add the battery grip then a pain the neck ! rnI terminal cover rubber tend to ammollarsi and Live View is very old! The price is still alticchio.rnrn Opinion: Second after the D3200 SLR (a toy), gives satisfactions hallucinating, if combined with a fixed lens (type 135mm f 2.8 or 24mm f 2.5) can lead addictive! RnPagata 670 euro with 128,000 shots, when the time will change the shutter but I think I will always because the quality and balance of the images on full frame 12 mpx is something grandioso.rnrn sent on March 16, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
