|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Checco79 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Checco79 ![]() |
![]() | Canon RF 28-70mm f/2 L USM Pros: Autofocus, colors, sharpness, three-dimensionality, blurred, in practice the general rendering Cons: Weight, overall dimensions, 28mm instead of 24 Opinion: I've been aiming at it since it came out. I thought about it a lot, I informed myself a lot, then when I took it home I gave myself a c*glione for not having done it before. The first thing I appreciate is that I don't waste more time deciding, "Will there be enough light? Do I take the 24-70 f2.8 or will I need the fixeds?" Then I no longer have to edit photos made with different lenses trying to match the colors, I do everything (and well) with a single lens. I'm using it for reportage and corporate shooting, when there are conditions I try to put it to the whip with the backlight pushed to f2 without ever going into crisis, it loses a bit of contrast but it is perfectly solvable in post. It is very engraved and has a very gradual out of focus, the colors are always well balanced, it has character without becoming too invasive. The AF is really lightning fast, coupled with the R6 rarely fails. I tried to whip them by photographing my daughter who does not stand still for a moment and during a concert in a club, although the group was quite loaded I only have three out-of-focus photos out of 600, shooting from under the stage. The machine works very well at such open apertures. I miss the ability to shoot at 24mm, the 28 goes close to it but sometimes they are not enough. Its real drawback is the weight, if you do not use it for a while you go out of training and the arms and wrists suffer, but it is also my fault that I am rather mingherlino. I solved by buying a nice wide shoulder strap, the attachment to the back of the machine and does not clutter the opening of the articulated monitor. In summary: it is a lens that accompanies itself. I put on sale all the EF kit, I thought I felt the lack of 24L and 50L, and instead... sent on February 22, 2022 |
![]() | Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM Pros: Small, sharp, lightweight, compact Cons: Nothing to declare Opinion: I have long been undecided between this and Sigma Art, I chose what I found first on the market. For me it is the ace of briscola: very compact, stabilized, fast AF (on R6), great beautiful colors and perfectly usable at full aperture, plus it is also macro. It detaches the subject much more from the background than the 35 EF IS that I had and that has never thrilled me. A short time ago I had the opportunity to use it at a wedding alongside 35 Art, both on R6: it seems to me that it has much more character, the photos of Art I find them flatter on equal terms. In combo with the RF 16 it forms a truly pocket-sized and high-quality kit. sent on December 07, 2021 |
![]() | Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM Pros: Compact, lightweight, minimum focusing distance Cons: Maybe the price for those who take it on day one (like me) Opinion: Spoiler immediately that I would buy it again a hundred times, very satisfied. It's not the perfect lens, but it's tiny, lightweight, and it costs just the right. It focuses very closely and in this case you can see the black corners. For me it is not a problem since I often used apsc lenses on FF without removing the crop factor, so at the same price as the Tokina 11-16 I have an equally bright but much more portable lens. It is quite sharp already from the whole opening, if closed it produces a beautiful stellona and has a nice barrel distortion. Personally I prefer it to ultra-correct lenses such as the EF 14 f2.8 which is certainly more suitable for architecture, but I happened to use it in some weddings and I don't even like it a little for how it stretches the edges. This 16mm instead splits in a more pleasant way, on the edges it looks like a fisheye but in the center it is quite correct. It is the perfect lens to be carried always with you, in pairs at 35 STM it almost accompanies itself. sent on November 13, 2021 |
![]() | Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L USM II Pros: Construction, range of focal lengths, brightness Cons: Loss of sharpness at 35mm Opinion: If I were to keep only one lens in my kit lui.rnHa choose the range of focal lengths ideal for the way I shoot (reportage), use it as a disk 35 with the ability to zoom out. A 35mm TA and lost in engraving but to my taste the files are more than usable. rnPer rest of the colors and contrast are L series even at full aperture, has a minimum focusing distance of almost macro. Closing the diaphragm generates beautiful big star over highlights for me is a pro. The focus is pleasant, the aberrations are at a minimum, distorts and cartoon at room temperature but is resolved with one click (and then to me like vignetting). RnSoffre a little 'flare but I think it is physiological with wide angle lenses like that, I tried the 20-35L and is much, much worse than the 16-35L II.rnSe you need this range of focal lengths and this light there are few alternatives, but I think worth all the money it costs. sent on February 18, 2013 |
![]() | Sigma 50mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM Pros: Sharpness, blur, soft skin, resistance to flare. Cons: Size, front-focus. Opinion: Bought used from a user forum.rnE 'my favorite portrait lens, I had to use the AF micro-adjustment on both 7D that of 5D2, and with values ??very different from each other so I could also be a problem of reflex.rnA Apart from that I do not find other defects, the use for weddings and concerts as a lens in which the lights are always a problem. The focus is very good and bright spots are circular to f4, crystal clear even at full aperture, autofocus is fast and accurate. He has a great overall performance but I appreciate especially the complexion and the micro-to the maximum apertura.rnHo thoroughly tested four samples of Canon but none I liked how the Sigma. sent on February 18, 2013 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me