|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Zanini Claudio www.juzaphoto.com/p/ZaniniClaudio  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 14mm f/2.8 L USM II Pros: Firmness, clarity, construction, af fast Cons: I find none Opinion: I tried several wide-angle, but as sharp as I think this is hard to find. Speaking of this magnitude. Before buying it I was lucky enough to try it. A 2.8 and 'already clear though and' a focus that I will never use, because I do landscapes, I've heard of all colors of this lens, but from what turns out I highly recommend it sent on March 01, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 300mm f/2.8 L IS II USM Pros: Sharpness, light, with great duplicators Cons: is the price seems exaggerated Opinion: I can not find flaws, rather just clicks you realize the image quality. l 'autofocus quick and quiet. I was impressed with the quality tc2x, I use it both on D1X 7DMark2 that on, you are from a 300mm to 960mm in a moment of pure quality. I recommend it with flying colors with honors, this time at home Canon outdone herself sent on September 23, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 135mm f/2.0 L USM Pros: Sharpness, blur, price Cons: difficult to find Opinion: quality 'f2 fantastic. From this and 'even better than what I expected, the lack of stabilizer did not create any problem, we often use F 2.8 3.2 in tight close-ups, depth and' really low, you are at the f2 eyes in focus and the nose completely sfuocato.mentre in the middle bust and f2 'stratospheric detachment with the background. You 'from 6 months it took and I use it a lot. Advised sent on September 20, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 200mm f/2.8 L II USM Pros: Sharpest, sfuocato.solido as a rock Cons: I can not find Opinion: E 'for more than a year that I use this lens with great satisfaction. To the first floor is the increased usage. But I confess that I use both in the theater with a single foot and some landscapes in the mountains where they often need a long lens. I do not understand sometimes why. Certain inflated prices, some will have the stabilizer, but it seems a bit 'too. I use it always with the 5 de confess that the first few times I did not believe in its image quality. I highly recommend it sent on February 17, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 24mm f/1.4 L II USM Pros: Sharpness wide open, with no AC, great auto focus Cons: Nothing. I did not find any defect Opinion: I was pretty sure of what I was going to buy, but I had no idea such a result. I use both with 5d 7d with that. My exemplary 'already sharp wide open, in ambieti close the diaphragm only because of the depth of field. In the landscapes and photos in the city from the results are truly unique. It 's true the only flaw is' not having sent on January 07, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM Pros: Sharpness, colors, price Cons: AC wide open, but is resolved quickly in PS Opinion: An 'optical fantastic already. Open to all, seeing the oppinioni of all of you I decided to buy it. With the 5 D I had no doubt the image quality give your oppinioni on the 7D in the servant becomes a spectacle in sports photography, I tried both of the first storey photograph some monuments .... Fantastic in all, recommended sent on October 08, 2013 |
 | Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: Sharpness already at 1.4. Boken beautiful. aberration almost absent, precise AF Cons: Is not tropicalized Opinion: I've always had big doubts for sigma lenses, but looking at the various tests and opinions I wanted to try. I like it a lot. Sharpest. Af precise, even within the churches where the light is always poor do not make a wrong. The f is not fast, but it does its job very well. A F1, 4 is already clear with a little unsharp mask becomes perfetto.provato also for landscapes, obvious that to f8 or f11 becomes a blade. Advised sent on September 03, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 L Macro IS USM Pros: Sharpness, no chromatic aberration, stabilization Cons: no Opinion: The sharpness and stabilization really makes this lens perfect. I use it all over for macros, but for close-ups becomes fantastic. I always bring him back and I never get tired using it because I know that the result is you have the highest level of quality. The fact of the stabilization facilitates you a lot when shots time low. RECOMMENDED sent on September 01, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Pros: Cost, very sharp, precise in focus Cons: This has already been said, the para absent light Opinion: At full aperture suffers a little in the corners but it is already very sharp in the center, but already 2.2 is another story. I tried several shots has a sfucato fantastico.Nelle street is just as exceptional as close todir a little becomes a real blade. Easy to carry. trying to dim light I was impressed with the accuracy. I recommend it, The only drawback as I said I will have to order the para light, but this is not central to the quality of this glass sent on March 18, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
