|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Stefano Gambineri www.juzaphoto.com/p/StefanoGambineri  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EOS R Pros: Image quality. FV shooting mode. Cons: Impression of poor solidity. Opinion: I bought the Canon EOS R in June 2019 after "stalling" and reading hundreds of reviews. I own an 80D and a 5D MK II, I like landscape and nature and I wanted to check the improvements on a latest generation OF FF and especially I was looking forward to shooting with a Mirrorless. Well, as I reported in " PRO ", the quality of the photographic image is, in my opinion, VERY. I read that the sensor is that of the MK IV, others say it is new; definitely the processor is new. I did not test the video because I absolutely do not care; most of the criticism I found on the forums relates to that. I have not yet used some features ( see the use of the touch bar ) because once you set the machine to FV ( NEW GENIAL ) you will not take it off anymore.... I shot with L-series optics but EF with adapter without dier. Everything OK except the EF 24-105 f4 first series that, after a thousand clicks, began to show communication defects with the machine with the appearance of error message and need to turn it off and on again. The other optics, ie 16-35 f4L, 70-200 f4L smooth, 100-400 f4.5-5.6L first series, Tamron 90 mm f2.8 Macro are fine; it works well, other novelty of the R series, also the 15-85 mm aps-c that can be mounted with the same adapter as the EF and that produces cropped images automatically, that is, uses about 11-12 MPX with a focal of 24-135mm . The machine is a bit "read" but not so much as weight (The reading on an ML is desirable and is one of the advantages over the reflexes ) as as as a construction and "impression" when holding (Also has an excellent ergonomics); despite this it is robust because i once fell to the ground accidentally but presented only a slight dent and no consequences on the operation. In the presence of light the viewfinder shows an image practically the same as the optical one and makes you see the photo as it will appear after taken> another great NEW in my opinion. Good battery life if miscellaneous parameters set to power saving. Waiting to buy the native optics I still enjoy with the current goals the MERAVIGLIOSI COLORI CANON. sent on August 08, 2019 |
 | Sigma 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6 II DG HSM Pros: Construction (although not EX). Optical quality. Distortion. Colors. Cons: Low light (Incidentally, not very useful in a fisheye), interference of the light side, despite the built-in hood, due to the curvature of the lens. Opinion: I recently purchased this lens is for interest to images you can capture with a fisheye is excellent references for the brother of the series antecedente.Pur not yet been able to take many pictures are excited about the optical performance of this lens. The sharpness is excellent as well as the color rendering. I made a comparison (I admit it is not very accurate as yours or those of some amateurs in various forums) with my Canon 17-40 F4 lens estimated, and I found a very similar performance. If we consider that the 'picture angle is more than I would say that the results are excellent. Regarding the distortion are equally enthusiastic although I have read that the 'copy of the previous series was a tad better (?). In conclusion I think this ultrawide zoom an excellent purchase and are only at 'beginning of the journey .... sent on November 17, 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
